PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT
U.S. DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER
RICHMOND, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Table 1: 1990 Census Data for DGSC Area
| Block Group 1 |
Block Group 2 |
Block Group 3 |
|
| Total persons |
1,231 | 213 | 142 |
| % Male |
33.3 | 46.0 | 63.4 |
| % Female | 66.7 | 54.0 | 36.6 |
| % White |
51.7 | 94.4 | 69.7 |
| % Black |
47.3 | 4.2 | 26.1 |
| % Other races |
1.0 | 1.4 | 4.2 |
| % Younger than 10 |
44.9 | 9.4 | 21.8 |
| % Age 65 and over |
2.4 | 15.5 | 2.1 |
| Households* |
480 | 100 | 33 |
| Persons per household |
2.56 | 2.13 | 3.03 |
| % Owner occupied |
6.2 | 58.0 | 6.1 |
| % Renter occupied |
93.8 | 42.0 | 93.9 |
| Median value of owner- occupied units |
$55,000 | $49,400 | $50,000 |
| Median monthly rent for renter- occupied units |
$351 | $335 | $510 |
*= A household is defined as an occupied housing unit but does
not include group quarters such as military barracks,
prisons, and college dormitories.
Table 2: Groundwater Contaminants of Concern for the Open Storage Area
(ppb) | ||
| 1,1-Dichloroethylene | ||
| Tetrachloroethylene | ||
| Trichloroethylene |
Reference: (Dames and Moore 1989b) *BDL= Below Detection Limit
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.
a= Calculated from the Cancer Slope Factor
b= Maximum Contaminant Level Goal
Table 3: Groundwater Contaminants of Concern for Area 50
| Benzene | ||
| Chlorobenzene | ||
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | ||
| 1,1-Dichloroethylene | ||
| T-1,2-Dichloroethylene | ||
| Tetrachloroethylene | ||
| Trichloroethylene | ||
| Vinyl Chloride | ||
| Benzo(a)anthracene | ||
| Benzo(k)fluoranthene | ||
| Chrysene |
Reference: (Dames and Moore 1989b) *BDL= Below Detection Limit
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.
**NT= Analysis for chemical not performed for all samples
a= Maximum Contaminant Level Goal
b= Calculated from the Reference Dose for ingestion by a child
c= Calculated from the Cancer Slope Factor
Table 4: Contaminants of Concern for the National Guard Area
Values (ppb) | ||||
| Arsenic | ||||
| Beryllium | ||||
| Lead | ||||
| Nickel | ||||
| Benzene | ||||
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | ||||
| 1,1-Dichloroethylene | ||||
| T-1,2-Dichloroethylene | ||||
| 1,2-Dichloropropane | ||||
| Tetrachloroethylene | ||||
| Trichloroethylene | ||||
| PAHs Chrysene |
||||
| Indeno(1,2,3)Pyrene | ||||
Reference: (Dames and Moore 1989b, CH2M Hill 1991)
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.
| *NGA= National Guard Area **NT= Analysis for chemical not performed for samples ***BDL= Below Detection Limit ****NI= No information on the chemical for the medium |
a= Ambient Water Quality Criteria--surface water b= Maximum Contaminant Level Goal--groundwater c= Calculated from the Cancer Slope Factor--groundwater |
Table 5: Contaminants of Concern for the Fire Training Area
Values (ppb) | |||||||||
| Arsenic | 10,000 |
21,000 |
|||||||
| Beryllium | |||||||||
| Chromium (hexavalent) | 20,000 |
19,000 |
|||||||
| Lead | 102,000 |
52,000 |
|||||||
| Carbon Tetrachloride | 2,600 |
||||||||
| 1,1-Dichloroethylene | 18,000 |
5,200 |
6,500 |
530+ |
245+ |
||||
| Methylene Chloride | 781,000 |
3,700 |
53,000 |
||||||
| Tetrachloroethylene | 21,000 |
19,000 |
1,500 |
16,000 |
130,000 |
15 |
2.4 |
||
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | 154,000 |
78,000 |
52,000 |
7,300 |
|||||
| Trichloroethylene | 154,000 |
110,000 |
3,400 |
8,700 |
76,000 |
31 |
14 |
||
| Chlordane | 3,200 |
||||||||
Reference: (Dames and Moore 1989c)
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.
*NT= Analysis for chemical not performed on all samples; **NI= No information on the chemical in the medium; ***B= Chemical present in all blanks
+= Chemical may have been 1,1-Dichloroethane; instrument cannot distinguish; @BDL= Below Detection Limit
a= Maximum Contaminant Level Goal--groundwater; b= Environmental Media Evaluation Guide--drinking water; c= Calculated from the Cancer Slope Factor--soil
Table 6: Groundwater Contaminants of Concern for the Acid Neutralization Pits
| Arsenic | |||
| Lead | |||
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | |||
| T-1,2-Dichloroethylene | |||
| Tetrachloroethylene | |||
| Trichloroethylene | |||
Reference: (Dames and Moore 1989a) *NT= Analysis for chemical not performed for samples
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.
Table 7: Groundwater Contaminants of Concern in Monitoring Wells for Building 112
October 1992
| Total Lead | ||
| Total Beryllium | ||
| Total Chromium |
Reference: (Law Environmental, Inc. 1993) a= Maximum Contaminant Level--groundwater
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.
b= Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide--groundwater
c= Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guide for children--groundwater
Table 8: Groundwater Contaminants of Concern in Monitoring Wells for the Fuel Oil Storage Area
October 1992
| 1,1,2-Trichloroethane | ||
| Tetrachloroethene | ||
| Trichloroethene | ||
| Vinyl Chloride | ||
| Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | ||
| Benzene | ||
| 1,2-Dichlorobenzene | ||
| 1,4-Dichlorobenzene | ||
| Total Lead | ||
| Total Chromium |
Reference: (Law Environmental, Inc. 1993)
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.
a= Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide--groundwater
b= Maximum Contaminant Level--groundwater
c= Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guide for children--groundwater
A= Estimated concentration due to the dilution factor being greater than 10x.
B= Estimated concentration; concentration detected in the samples exceeded the calibration range of the instrument. Other samples had concentrations
below the detection limit.
Table 9: Contaminants of Concern in Private Wells (Rayon Park Area)
May, 1985-January, 1987
| Benzene | ||
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | ||
| 1,1-Dichloroethylene | ||
| Tetrachloroethylene | ||
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | ||
| Trichloroethylene |
Reference: (Chesterfield Health District 1987)
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.
a= Maximum Contaminant Level Goal--groundwater
b= Calculated from the Cancer Slope Factor--ingestion
Table 10: Surface Water Contaminants of Concern in Kingsland Creek
| Tetrachloroethylene | ||
| Trichloroethylene |
Reference: (Dames and Moore 1989c)
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.
*BDL= Below Detection Level
**J= Laboratory Estimated Value
APPENDIX B. COMPARISON VALUES, HEALTH GUIDELINES,
AND QUANTITATIVE UNITS
COMPARISON VALUES, HEALTH GUIDELINES, AND QUANTITATIVE UNITS
Comparison values for ATSDR public health assessments are
contaminant concentrations in specific media that are used as an
aid to select contaminants for further evaluation. Those values
usually appear in the Environmental Contamination and Other
Hazards
and the Public Health Implications section of this
document. Health guidelines, which usually appear in the Public
Health Implications
sections of this public health assessment,
provide concentrations used to estimate a dose at which health
effects might or might not be observed. Quantitative units
express the amount of contaminant that has been detected in
specific media. Those units are usually first discussed in the
Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section; they are
described below.
| Comparison Values and Health Guidelines |
|
| * AWQC | = Ambient Water Quality Criteria |
| * CREG | = Cancer Risk Evaluation Guides |
| * CSF | = Cancer Slope Factor |
| * EMEG | = Environmental Media Evaluation Guides |
| * LTHA | = Lifetime Health Advisory |
| * MCL | = Maximum Contaminant Level |
| * MCLG | = Maximum Contaminants Level Goal |
| * MRL | = Minimal Risk Level |
| * LOAEL | = Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level |
| * NOAEL | = No Observed Adverse Effect Level |
| * RfC | = Reference Concentration |
| * RfD | = Reference Dose |
| * RMEG | = Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guide |
| Quantitative Units |
|
| * ppm | = parts per million, (milligrams per liter, mg/L of water) |
| * ppb | = parts per billion, (micrograms per liter, µg/L water) |
| * mg/kg | = milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg; soil, sediment, or solid) |
| * µg/kg | = micrograms per kilogram (µg/kg soil; sediment, or solid) |
| * kg | = kilogram |
| * mg | = milligram |
| * µg | = microgram |
| * L | = liter |
Definition of Comparison Values and Health Guidelines
| AWQC | Ambient Water Quality Criteria are the recommended maximum
permissible pollutant concentrations protective of aquatic
organisms. They are federally enforceable. |
| CREG | Cancer Risk Evaluation Guides are derived by ATSDR from
the EPA Cancer Slope Factor. They represent an estimated
concentration in water, soil, or air that would be
expected to cause no more than one excess cancer in a
million (10E-6) persons exposed over a lifetime. |
| CSF | A Cancer Slope Factor is usually, but not always, the upper 95th percentile confidence limit of the slope for the dose-response curve. A CSF is developed for a probable or likely carcinogen and is expressed as (mg/kg/day)-1. When data permit, slope factors listed in IRIS are based on absorbed doses, although many of them are based on administered doses.
|
| EMEG | Environmental Media Evaluation Guides are derived by ATSDR
from ATSDR's Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) and factor in body
weight and ingestion rates. An EMEG is the concentration
of a particular contaminant in water, soil, or air at
which daily human exposure is unlikely to result in
adverse noncarcinogenic effects. |
| LTHA | A Lifetime Health Advisory represents contaminant
concentrations that EPA considers protective of
noncarcinogenic health effects during a lifetime (70
years) of exposure. Drinking water concentrations are
developed to predict acceptable exposure levels for both
adults and children when data on a NOAEL or LOAEL exist
from animal or human studies. LTHAs are not enforceable
standards. |
| MCL | Maximum Contaminant Levels represent contaminant
concentrations that EPA deems protective of public health
(considering the availability and economics of water
treatment technology) over a lifetime (70 years) at an
exposure rate of 2 liters of water per day. MCLs are
enforceable standards. |
| MCLG | Maximum Contaminants Level Goal is a proposed,
nonenforceable drinking water health goal recommended by
EPA and set at a level at which no known or anticipated
adverse human health effects are expected to occur. |
| MRL | A Minimal Risk Level is an estimate of daily human
exposure to a chemical that is likely to be without an
appreciable risk of adverse noncancerous effects over a
specified duration of exposure. MRLs are based on human
and animal studies and are reported for acute (< 14 days),
intermediate (15-364 days), and chronic (> 365 days)
exposures. MRLs are published in ATSDR Toxicological
Profiles for specific chemicals. |
| LOAEL | Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level is the lowest
exposure level at which there are statistically or
biologically significant increases in frequency or
severity of adverse health effects between the exposed
population and its appropriate control group. LOAELs may
be used to estimate a dose at which people are not
expected to develop adverse health effects. LOAELs are
published in ATSDR Toxicological Profiles for specific
chemicals. |
| NOAEL | A No Observed Adverse Effect Level is an exposure level at
which there are no statistically or biologically
significant increases in frequency or severity of adverse
health effects between the exposed population and its
appropriate control group. NOAELs may be used to estimate
a dose at which people are not expected to develop adverse
health effects. NOAELs are published in ATSDR
Toxicological Profiles for specific chemicals. |
| RfC | EPA's Reference Concentration is an estimate of the daily
inhalation exposure to a contaminant (including sensitive
subpopulations) that is unlikely to cause noncancerous
health effects during a lifetime exposure (chronic RfC) or
during a limited time interval (subchronic RfC). |
| RfD | EPA's Reference Dose is an estimate of the daily oral
exposure to a contaminant (including sensitive subgroups)
that is unlikely to cause noncancerous health effects
during a lifetime exposure (chronic RfD) or during a
limited time interval (subchronic RfD). |
| RMEG | Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guides are derived by ATSDR from EPA's Reference Dose (RfD) and factor in body weight and ingestion rates. An RMEG is the concentration of a particular contaminant in water, soil, or air at which daily human exposure is unlikely to result in adverse noncarcinogenic effects. |