Skip directly to: content | left navigation | search

PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT

U.S. DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER
RICHMOND, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA



APPENDIX A. TABLES

Table 1: 1990 Census Data for DGSC Area

Block
Group 1
Block
Group 2
Block
Group 3

Total
persons
1,231 213 142

% Male

33.3 46.0 63.4
% Female 66.7 54.0 36.6

% White

51.7 94.4 69.7
% Black

47.3 4.2 26.1
% Other
races
1.0 1.4 4.2

% Younger
than 10

44.9 9.4 21.8
% Age 65
and over
2.4 15.5 2.1

Households*

480 100 33
Persons per
household

2.56 2.13 3.03
% Owner
occupied

6.2 58.0 6.1
% Renter
occupied

93.8 42.0 93.9
Median value
of owner-
occupied units

$55,000 $49,400 $50,000
Median monthly
rent for renter-
occupied units
$351 $335 $510

Reference: U.S. Bureau of the Census 1991

*= A household is defined as an occupied housing unit but does not include group quarters such as military barracks, prisons, and college dormitories.


Table 2: Groundwater Contaminants of Concern for the Open Storage Area

Chemical
Concentration Ranges (ppb)
Comparison Values
(ppb)

Groundwater




1,1-Dichloroethylene
BDL*-10
0.058a
Tetrachloroethylene
BDL-140
0b
Trichloroethylene
BDL-210
0b

Reference: (Dames and Moore 1989b)
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.

*BDL= Below Detection Limit
a= Calculated from the Cancer Slope Factor
b= Maximum Contaminant Level Goal



Table 3: Groundwater Contaminants of Concern for Area 50

Chemical
Concentration Ranges (ppb)
Comparison Values (ppb)



Benzene
BDL*-6.4
0a
Chlorobenzene
BDL-1,500
200b
1,2-Dichloroethane
BDL-17
0a
1,1-Dichloroethylene
BDL-19
0.058c
T-1,2-Dichloroethylene
BDL-13,000
100a
Tetrachloroethylene
BDL-3,000
0a
Trichloroethylene
BDL-18,000
0a
Vinyl Chloride
BDL-65
0a
Benzo(a)anthracene
NT**-7
0a
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
NT-14
0a
Chrysene
NT-9
0a

Reference: (Dames and Moore 1989b)
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.

*BDL= Below Detection Limit
**NT= Analysis for chemical not performed for all samples
a= Maximum Contaminant Level Goal
b= Calculated from the Reference Dose for ingestion by a child
c= Calculated from the Cancer Slope Factor



Table 4: Contaminants of Concern for the National Guard Area

Chemical
Concentration Ranges (ppb)
Comparison
Values (ppb)

Groundwater
Surface Water


Inside NGA*
Outside NGA






Arsenic
NT**
NT
BDL***-520
0.0022a
Beryllium
NT
NT
NT-0.41
0.0068a
Lead
NT
NT
BDL-430
50a
Nickel
NT
NT
NT-230
13.4a
Benzene
BDL-6.4
BDL
BDL
0b
1,2-Dichloroethane
BDL-190
BDL-8.2
NI****
0b
1,1-Dichloroethylene
BDL-45
BDL-7.1
NI
0.058c
T-1,2-Dichloroethylene
BDL-620
BDL-850
BDL-110
100b
1,2-Dichloropropane
BDL-240
BDL
NI
0b
Tetrachloroethylene
BDL-1,100
BDL-37
BDL-5
0b
Trichloroethylene
BDL-7,100
BDL-2,400
BDL-190
0b
PAHs
Chrysene
NT
NT
NT-16
0.0028a
Indeno(1,2,3)Pyrene
NI
NI
NT-47
0.0028a

Reference: (Dames and Moore 1989b, CH2M Hill 1991)
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.

*NGA= National Guard Area
**NT= Analysis for chemical not performed for samples
***BDL= Below Detection Limit
****NI= No information on the chemical for the medium
a= Ambient Water Quality Criteria--surface water
b= Maximum Contaminant Level Goal--groundwater
c= Calculated from the Cancer Slope Factor--groundwater



Table 5: Contaminants of Concern for the Fire Training Area

Chemical
Concentration Ranges (ppb)
Comparison
Values (ppb)

Groundwater
Soils
Soil Gas


1982
1985
1987
1988
Surface
Subsurface
October
November






Arsenic
NT*
BDL@
BDL-13
BDL-6.9
1000-
10,000
BDL-
21,000
NI**
NI
0a
Beryllium
NT
BDL
BDL-5.2
BDL-2.5
BDL-920
BDL-940
NI
NI
0a
Chromium (hexavalent)
NT
45-180
NT
NT
7,000-
20,000
BDL-
19,000
NI
NI
50b
Lead
BDL
4.7-14
BDL-15
BDL-35
15,000-
102,000
2,300-
52,000
NI
NI
0a
Carbon Tetrachloride
NT
BDL
BDL-
2,600
BDL
NI
NI
NI
NI
0a
1,1-Dichloroethylene
BDL-
18,000
BDL-
5,200
BDL-260
BDL-
6,500
NI
NI
<1-
530+
<1-
245+
0.058c
Methylene Chloride
BDL-
781,000
BDL-
3,700
BDL-40
BDL-
53,000
B***
6.2-46
NI
NI
50b
Tetrachloroethylene
BDL-
21,000
BDL-
19,000
BDL-
1,500
BDL-
16,000
BDL
BDL-
130,000
<0.05-
15
<0.05-
2.4
0a
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
BDL-
154,000
2.2-
78,000
BDL-560
BDL-
52,000
BDL
BDL-
7,300
NI
NI
200a
Trichloroethylene
BDL-
154,000
1-
110,000
BDL-
3,400
BDL-
8,700
BDL
BDL-
76,000
<0.05-
31
<0.05-
14
0a
Chlordane
NI
NI
NI
NI
BDL-
3,200
BDL
NI
NI
0.54c

Reference: (Dames and Moore 1989c)
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.

*NT= Analysis for chemical not performed on all samples; **NI= No information on the chemical in the medium; ***B= Chemical present in all blanks
+= Chemical may have been 1,1-Dichloroethane; instrument cannot distinguish; @BDL= Below Detection Limit
a= Maximum Contaminant Level Goal--groundwater; b= Environmental Media Evaluation Guide--drinking water; c= Calculated from the Cancer Slope Factor--soil



Table 6: Groundwater Contaminants of Concern for the Acid Neutralization Pits

Chemical
Concentration Ranges (ppb)
Comparison Values (ppb)

1987
1988
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal



Arsenic
BDL-4.3
BDL-2.2
0
Lead
BDL-2.3
BDL-5.1
0
1,2-Dichloroethane
BDL-440
BDL-170
0
T-1,2-Dichloroethylene
BDL-140
NT*
100
Tetrachloroethylene
BDL-1,800
BDL-3,700
0
Trichloroethylene
BDL-1,400
BDL-940
0

Reference: (Dames and Moore 1989a)
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.

*NT= Analysis for chemical not performed for samples


Table 7: Groundwater Contaminants of Concern in Monitoring Wells for Building 112
October 1992


Chemical
Concentration Ranges (ppb)
Comparison Values (ppb)






Total Lead
13-56
50a
Total Beryllium
6-16
0.008b
Total Chromium
27-130
50c

Reference: (Law Environmental, Inc. 1993)
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.

a= Maximum Contaminant Level--groundwater
b= Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide--groundwater
c= Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guide for children--groundwater



Table 8: Groundwater Contaminants of Concern in Monitoring Wells for the Fuel Oil Storage Area
October 1992


Chemical
Concentration Ranges (ppb)
Comparison Values (ppb)






1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<0.9-40
0.6a
Tetrachloroethene
<1.0-3.2
0.7a
Trichloroethene
<0.6-300,000(A)
3.0a
Vinyl Chloride
<5.0-240(B)
2.0a
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
<0.6-1,500(A)
100.0b
Benzene
<0.2-5.2
5.0b
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
<5.0-660
600.0b
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<6.0-480
75.0b
Total Lead
27-49
50.0b
Total Chromium
35-78
50.0c

Reference: (Law Environmental, Inc. 1993)
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.

a= Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide--groundwater
b= Maximum Contaminant Level--groundwater
c= Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guide for children--groundwater

A= Estimated concentration due to the dilution factor being greater than 10x.
B= Estimated concentration; concentration detected in the samples exceeded the calibration range of the instrument. Other samples had concentrations below the detection limit.



Table 9: Contaminants of Concern in Private Wells (Rayon Park Area)
May, 1985-January, 1987


Chemical
Concentration Ranges (ppb)
Comparison Values (ppb)






Benzene
<0.1-1.4
0a
1,2-Dichloroethane
<0.2-6.2
0a
1,1-Dichloroethylene
<0.1-41
0.058b
Tetrachloroethylene
<0.1-4.9
0a
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
<0.2-500
200a
Trichloroethylene
<0.1-5.2
0a

Reference: (Chesterfield Health District 1987)
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.

a= Maximum Contaminant Level Goal--groundwater
b= Calculated from the Cancer Slope Factor--ingestion



Table 10: Surface Water Contaminants of Concern in Kingsland Creek

Chemical
Contaminant Ranges (ppb)
Comparison Values (ppb)


Ambient Water Quality Criteria



Tetrachloroethylene
BDL*-4.6J**
0.8
Trichloroethylene
BDL-18
2.7

Reference: (Dames and Moore 1989c)
Refer to the Beginning of the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section for a description of how contaminants of concern are selected.

*BDL= Below Detection Level
**J= Laboratory Estimated Value



APPENDIX B. COMPARISON VALUES, HEALTH GUIDELINES,
AND QUANTITATIVE UNITS

COMPARISON VALUES, HEALTH GUIDELINES, AND QUANTITATIVE UNITS

Comparison values for ATSDR public health assessments are contaminant concentrations in specific media that are used as an aid to select contaminants for further evaluation. Those values usually appear in the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards and the Public Health Implications section of this document. Health guidelines, which usually appear in the Public Health Implications sections of this public health assessment, provide concentrations used to estimate a dose at which health effects might or might not be observed. Quantitative units express the amount of contaminant that has been detected in specific media. Those units are usually first discussed in the Environmental Contamination and Other Hazards section; they are described below.

      Comparison Values and Health Guidelines

* AWQC = Ambient Water Quality Criteria
* CREG = Cancer Risk Evaluation Guides
* CSF = Cancer Slope Factor
* EMEG = Environmental Media Evaluation Guides
* LTHA = Lifetime Health Advisory
* MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
* MCLG = Maximum Contaminants Level Goal
* MRL = Minimal Risk Level
* LOAEL = Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level
* NOAEL = No Observed Adverse Effect Level
* RfC = Reference Concentration
* RfD = Reference Dose
* RMEG = Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guide

      Quantitative Units

* ppm = parts per million, (milligrams per liter, mg/L of water)
* ppb = parts per billion, (micrograms per liter, µg/L water)
* mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg; soil, sediment, or solid)
* µg/kg = micrograms per kilogram (µg/kg soil; sediment, or solid)
* kg = kilogram
* mg = milligram
* µg = microgram
* L = liter

Definition of Comparison Values and Health Guidelines

AWQC Ambient Water Quality Criteria are the recommended maximum permissible pollutant concentrations protective of aquatic organisms. They are federally enforceable.

CREG Cancer Risk Evaluation Guides are derived by ATSDR from the EPA Cancer Slope Factor. They represent an estimated concentration in water, soil, or air that would be expected to cause no more than one excess cancer in a million (10E-6) persons exposed over a lifetime.

CSF A Cancer Slope Factor is usually, but not always, the upper 95th percentile confidence limit of the slope for the dose-response curve. A CSF is developed for a probable or likely carcinogen and is expressed as (mg/kg/day)-1. When data permit, slope factors listed in IRIS are based on absorbed doses, although many of them are based on administered doses.

EMEG Environmental Media Evaluation Guides are derived by ATSDR from ATSDR's Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) and factor in body weight and ingestion rates. An EMEG is the concentration of a particular contaminant in water, soil, or air at which daily human exposure is unlikely to result in adverse noncarcinogenic effects.

LTHA A Lifetime Health Advisory represents contaminant concentrations that EPA considers protective of noncarcinogenic health effects during a lifetime (70 years) of exposure. Drinking water concentrations are developed to predict acceptable exposure levels for both adults and children when data on a NOAEL or LOAEL exist from animal or human studies. LTHAs are not enforceable standards.

MCL Maximum Contaminant Levels represent contaminant concentrations that EPA deems protective of public health (considering the availability and economics of water treatment technology) over a lifetime (70 years) at an exposure rate of 2 liters of water per day. MCLs are enforceable standards.

MCLG Maximum Contaminants Level Goal is a proposed, nonenforceable drinking water health goal recommended by EPA and set at a level at which no known or anticipated adverse human health effects are expected to occur.

MRL A Minimal Risk Level is an estimate of daily human exposure to a chemical that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of adverse noncancerous effects over a specified duration of exposure. MRLs are based on human and animal studies and are reported for acute (< 14 days), intermediate (15-364 days), and chronic (> 365 days) exposures. MRLs are published in ATSDR Toxicological Profiles for specific chemicals.

LOAEL Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level is the lowest exposure level at which there are statistically or biologically significant increases in frequency or severity of adverse health effects between the exposed population and its appropriate control group. LOAELs may be used to estimate a dose at which people are not expected to develop adverse health effects. LOAELs are published in ATSDR Toxicological Profiles for specific chemicals.

NOAEL A No Observed Adverse Effect Level is an exposure level at which there are no statistically or biologically significant increases in frequency or severity of adverse health effects between the exposed population and its appropriate control group. NOAELs may be used to estimate a dose at which people are not expected to develop adverse health effects. NOAELs are published in ATSDR Toxicological Profiles for specific chemicals.

RfC EPA's Reference Concentration is an estimate of the daily inhalation exposure to a contaminant (including sensitive subpopulations) that is unlikely to cause noncancerous health effects during a lifetime exposure (chronic RfC) or during a limited time interval (subchronic RfC).

RfD EPA's Reference Dose is an estimate of the daily oral exposure to a contaminant (including sensitive subgroups) that is unlikely to cause noncancerous health effects during a lifetime exposure (chronic RfD) or during a limited time interval (subchronic RfD).

RMEG Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guides are derived by ATSDR from EPA's Reference Dose (RfD) and factor in body weight and ingestion rates. An RMEG is the concentration of a particular contaminant in water, soil, or air at which daily human exposure is unlikely to result in adverse noncarcinogenic effects.

Table of Contents


Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1825 Century Blvd, Atlanta, GA 30345
Contact CDC: 800-232-4636 / TTY: 888-232-6348
 
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web Portal