Skip directly to: content | left navigation | search

PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT

IONIA CITY LANDFILL
IONIA, IONIA COUNTY, MICHIGAN




APPENDIX A

FIGURES



Figure 1. Site Location


APPENDIX B

TABLES

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Contaminants of concern for this assessment.

Table 2. Concentrations of contaminants of concern found in on-site groundwater monitoring wells (1981-1993).

Table 3. Concentrations of contaminants of concern from shallow sub-surface soil samples on the site, from the RI (1987).

Table 4. Maximum concentrations of indicator and other chemicals in the drums found on the site, from the RI (1987).

Table 5. Concentrations of contaminants of concern from sub-surface soil samples collected from trenches on the site, from the RI (1987).

Table 6. Concentrations of contaminants of concern from sub-surface soil boring samples on the site, from the RI (1987).

Table 7. Concentrations of contaminants of concern in sediment from the unnamed tributary (1982-1987).

Table 8. Concentrations of contaminants of concern in surface water samples from the unnamed tributary (1982).

Table 9. Concentrations of contaminants of concern found in off-site air samples from the RI (1987).

Table 10. Concentrations of contaminants of concern found in off-site shallow subsurface soil samples collected near the site during the RI (1987).

Table 11. Concentrations of contaminants of concern from off-site soil borings from the RI (1987).

Table 12. Maximum concentrations of indicator and other chemicals in groundwater samples from off-site monitoring wells (1987-93).

Table 13. Maximum concentrations of indicator and other chemicals in groundwater samples from residential wells near the site collected during the RI (1987).

Table 14. Concentrations of contaminants of concern found in surface water samples from the Grand River near the site, from the RI (1987).

Table 15. Concentrations of contaminants of concern found in sediment samples from the Grand River near the site, from the RI (1987).


Table 1. Contaminants of concern for this assessment.

arsenic
benzene
butyl benzyl phthalate
cadmium
chloroethane
chloroform
chloromethane
chromium
1,1-dichloroethane
1,1-dichloroethylene
1,2-dichloroethylene (total)
lead
manganese
mercury
methyl ethyl ketone
methylene chloride
nickel
styrene
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
tetrachloroethylene
toluene
1,1,1-trichloroethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
trichloroethylene
vinyl chloride
zinc

Table 2. Concentrations of contaminants of concern found in on-site groundwater monitoring wells (1981-1993).

Chemical Date Maximum Concentration
(ppb)
Reference Comparison Value
(ppb)
Shallow Intermediate
arsenic 11/93 48.6 NS 13 3E, 0.02C
benzene 8/92 4 NS 13 1C
11/93 3.J NS 13
cadmium 1981 20 NS 12 7E, Carcinogen
1987-8 22 6 1
11/93 ND NS 13
chloroethane 8/92 160 NS 13 NA
11/93 260 NS 13
chloroform 8/92 ND NS 13 100E, 6C
11/93 12 NS 13
chloromethane 8/92 ND NS 13 3A
11/93 9.J NS 13
chromium (total) 1981 640 NS 12 10,000R (III)

Carcinogen (VI)

1987-8 186 132 1
11/93 7.J NS 13
1,1-dichloroethane 1981 22 NS 12 Carcinogen
1987-8 26 ND 1
8/92 73 NS 13
11/93 1,400 NS 13
1,1-dichloroethylene 8/92 ND NS 13 90E, 0.06C
11/93 4.2 NS 13
1,2-dichloroethylene (total) 1981 150 NS 12 200R (trans)
70A (cis)
1987-8 31.a ND 1
8/92 120 NS 13
11/93 1,118 NS 13
lead 1981 2,000 NS 12 15PL, Carcinogen
1987-8 3.6 ND 1
11/93 2.6J NS 13
manganese 1987 658 44 1 50R
11/93 1,000 NS 13
methylene chloride 8/92 13 NS 13 600E, 5C
11/93 93,000.J NS 13
nickel 11/93 1,210 NS 13 carcinogen
styrene 8/92 ND NS 13 carcinogen
11/93 2.J NS 13
1,1,2,2-tetrachlorethane 8/92 ND NS 13 0.2C
11/93 440.J NS 13
tetrachloroethylene 8/92 ND NS 13 0.7C
11/93 5.J NS 13
toluene 1981 2,500 NS 12 2,000R
8/92 520 NS 13
11/93 300 NS 13
1,1,1-trichloroethane 1981 32 NS 12 200A
8/92 3 NS 13
11/93 350 NS 13
1,1,2-trichloroethane 8/92 ND NS 13 0.6C
11/93 4.J NS 13
trichloroethylene 1981 16 NS 12 3C
8/92 840 NS 13
11/93 3,300 NS 13
vinyl chloride 1987-8 69 ND 1 0.2E, Carcinogen
8/92 42 NS 13
11/93 31 NS 13
zinc 1981 110,000 NS 12 3,000R
1987-8 39 31 1
11/93 119 NS 13

Only chemicals that were detected are listed

Bolded chemicals exceed comparison values.
NS – Not Sampled
ND – Not Detected
J – Estimated Concentration: below Contract Required Detection Level, but above Instrument Detection Limit

(III)– For chromium(III)
(VI)– For chromium(VI)

NA – None Available
Carcinogen– Carcinogen (proven, probable, or possible) but no CREG available

Comparison Value Bases

a          Trans-1,2-dicloroethylene

Table 3. Concentrations of contaminants of concern from shallow sub-surface soil samples on the site, from the RI (1987).

Chemical Maximum Concentration
(ppm)
Comparison Value (soil)
(ppm)
cadmium 3 1E, Carcinogen
lead 59.a Carcinogen
methyl ethyl ketone 0.015B 1,000R
methylene chloride 0.009B 100E, 90C

Reference: 1

Only chemicals that were detected are listed
Bolded chemicals exceed comparison values.
B – Detected in laboratory quality control blank sample.
NA – None Available
Carcinogen– Carcinogen (proven, probable, or possible) but no CREG available

Comparison Value Bases

a          Value within typical range in soils.

Table 4. Maximum concentrations of indicator and other chemicals in the drums found on the site, from the RI (1987).

Chemical Maximum Concentration
(ppm)
Comparison Value (soil)
(ppm)
butyl benzyl phthalate 12,000 400R
chromium 2,850 2,000R (III)
Carcinogen (VI)
lead 10,100 Carcinogen
mercury 1 NA
methylene chloride 110.B 100E, 90C
styrene 1,900.B Carcinogen
toluene 460 400R
1,1,1-trichloroethane 640 NA
trichloroethylene 2 60C

Reference: 1

Only chemicals that were detected are listed

Bolded chemicals exceed comparison values.

B – Detected in laboratory quality control blank sample.

(III)– For chromium(III)

(VI)– For chromium(VI)

NA – None Available
Carcinogen– Carcinogen (proven, probable, or possible) but no CREG available

Comparison Value Bases

Table 5. Concentrations of contaminants of concern from sub-surface soil samples collected from trenches on the site, from the RI (1987).

Chemical Maximum Concentration
(ppm)
Comparison Value (soil)
(ppm)
butyl benzyl phthalate 2,400 400R
cadmium 6.7 1E, Carcinogen
lead 478 Carcinogen
mercury 1.5 NA
methylene chloride 2,220.B 100E, 90C
styrene 4,600.B Carcinogen
tetrachloroethylene 0.013 10C
toluene 9.8 400R
1,1,1-trichloroethane 0.94 NA
trichloroethylene 0.034B 60C

Reference: 1

Only chemicals that were detected are listed

Bolded chemicals exceed comparison values.

B – Detected in laboratory quality control blank sample.

NA – None Available
Carcinogen– Carcinogen (proven, probable, or possible) but no CREG available

Comparison Value Bases

Table 6. Concentrations of contaminants of concern from sub-surface soil boring samples on the site, from the RI (1987).

Chemical Maximum Concentration
(ppm)
Comparison Value (soil)
(ppm)
cadmium 3.6 1E, Carcinogen
methyl ethyl ketone 0.024B 1,000R
methylene chloride 0.011B 100E, 90C
toluene 0.120 400R

Reference: 1

Only chemicals that were detected are listed

Bolded chemicals exceed comparison values.

B – Detected in laboratory quality control blank sample.

NA – None Available
Carcinogen– Carcinogen (proven, probable, or possible) but no CREG available

Comparison Value Bases

Table 7. Concentrations of contaminants of concern in sediment from the unnamed tributary (1982-1987).

Chemical Date Maximum Concentration
(ppm)
Comparison Value (soil)
(ppm)
cadmium 1982 <0.1 1E, Carcinogen
1987 2.2
chromium 1982 17 2,000R (III)
Carcinogen (VI)
1987 16
1,2-dichloroethylene (total) 1982 0.055 40R (trans)
NA (cis)
manganese 1982 3,400 10R
methylene chloride 1982 0.3 100E, 90C
1987 0.037
trichloroethylene 1982 0.015 60C<

Reference: 1

Only chemicals that were detected are listed

Bolded chemicals exceed comparison values.

(III)– For chromium(III)
(VI)– For chromium(VI)

NA – None Available
Carcinogen– Carcinogen (proven, probable, or possible) but no CREG available

Comparison Value Bases

Table 8. Concentrations of contaminants of concern in surface water samples from the unnamed tributary (1982).

Chemical Maximum Concentration
(ppb)
Comparison Value
(ppb)
chromium <10 10,000R (III)
Carcinogen (VI)
1,1-dichloroethane 13 Carcinogen
1,2-dichloroethylene (total) 42 200R (trans)
70A (cis)
manganese 1,050 50R
methylene chloride 11 600E, 5C
1,1,1-trichloroethane <10 200A
trichloroethylene <10 3C
vinyl chloride 23 0.2E, Carcinogen

Reference: 1

Only chemicals that were detected are listed

Bolded chemicals exceed comparison values.

(III)– For chromium(III)
(VI)– For chromium(VI)

NA – None Available
Carcinogen– Carcinogen (proven, probable, or possible) but no CREG available

Comparison Value Bases

Table 9. Concentrations of contaminants of concern found in off-site air samples from the RI (1987).

Chemical Maximum Concentration
(ppb)
Comparison Value
(ppb)
1,1,1-trichloroethane 1.5 NA

Reference: 1

Only chemicals that were detected are listed

Bolded chemicals exceed comparison values.

NA – None Available

Table 10. Concentrations of contaminants of concern found in off-site shallow subsurface soil samples collected near the site during the RI (1987).

Chemical Maximum Concentration
(ppm)
Comparison Value (soil)
(ppm)
cadmium 2 1E, Carcinogen
lead 286 Carcinogen
methyl ethyl ketone 0.019B 1,000R
methylene chloride 0.031B 100E, 90C

Reference: 1

Only chemicals that were detected are listed

Bolded chemicals exceed comparison values.

B – Detected in laboratory quality control blank sample.

NA – None Available
Carcinogen– Carcinogen (proven, probable, or possible) but no CREG available

Comparison Value Bases

Table 11. Concentrations of contaminants of concern from off-site soil borings from the RI (1987).

Chemical Maximum Concentration
(ppm)
Comparison Value (soil)
(ppm)
cadmium 3.5 1E, Carcinogen
methyl ethyl ketone 0.083B 1,000R
methylene chloride 0.029B 100E, 90C
toluene 0.230 400R

Reference: 1

Only chemicals that were detected are listed

Bolded chemicals exceed comparison values.

B – Detected in laboratory quality control blank sample.

NA – None Available
Carcinogen– Carcinogen (proven, probable, or possible) but no CREG available

Comparison Value Bases

Table 12. Maximum concentrations of indicator and other chemicals in groundwater samples from off-site monitoring wells (1987-93).

Chemical Date Maximum Concentration
(ppb)
Reference Comparison Value
(ppb)
Shallow Intermediate
benzene 1987-8 6 ND 1 1C
8/92 1.J NS 13
11/93 0.6J NS 13
cadmium 1987-8 10 15 1 7E, Carcinogen
8/92 ND NS 13
11/93 ND NS 13
chromium 1987-8 14 14 1 10,000R (III)
Carcinogen (VI)
8/92 ND NS 13
11/93 ND NS 13
1,2-dichloroethylene (total) 1987-8 17.a ND 1 200R (trans)
70A (cis)
8/92 ND NS 13
11/93 24 NS 13
manganese 1987-8 897 70 1 50R
8/92 734 NS 13
11/93 634 NS 13
methylene chloride 1987-8 2.BJ ND 1 600E, 5C
8/92 ND NS 13
11/93 9.BJ NS 13
vinyl chloride 1987-8 86 ND 1 0.2E, Carcinogen
8/92 ND NS 13
11/93 22 NS 13
zinc 1987-8 20 30 1 3,000R
8/92 250 NS 13
11/93 774 NS 13

Only chemicals that were detected are listed

Bolded chemicals exceed comparison values.

ND – Not Detected

B – Detected in laboratory quality control blank sample.
J – Estimated Concentration: below Contract Required Detection Level, but above Instrument Detection Limit

(III)– For chromium(III)
(VI)– For chromium(VI)
NA – None Available
Carcinogen– Carcinogen (proven, probable, or possible) but no CREG available

Comparison Value Bases

a          Trans-1,2-dicloroethylene

Table 13. Maximum concentrations of indicator and other chemicals in groundwater samples from residential wells near the site collected during the RI (1987).

Chemical Maximum Concentration
(ppb)
Comparison Value
(ppb)
manganese 20 50R
tetrachloroethylene 0.7 0.7C
zinc 824 3,000R

Reference: 1

Only chemicals that were detected are listed

Bolded chemicals exceed comparison values.

Comparison Value Bases

R –    ATSDR Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guides (RMEGs), calculated from U.S. EPA Reference Dose, assuming child ingestion
C –    ATSDR Cancer Risk Evaluation Guides (CREGs), for 1 x 10-6 estimated excess cancer risk (a significant additional risk of developing cancer is taken to be one additional case of cancer in a population of 1 million people experiencing the exposure)

Table 14. Concentrations of contaminants of concern found in surface water samples from the Grand River near the site, from the RI (1987).

Chemical Maximum Concentration
(ppb)
Comparison Value
(ppb)
cadmium 10 7E, Carcinogen
1,2-dichloroethylene (total) 3 200R (trans)
70A (cis)
vinyl chloride 1.J 0.2E, Carcinogen

Reference: 1

Only chemicals that were detected are listed

Bolded chemicals exceed comparison values.

J – Estimated Concentration: below Contract Required Detection Level, but above Instrument Detection Limit

Carcinogen– Carcinogen (proven, probable, or possible) but no CREG available

Comparison Value Bases

Table 15. Concentrations of contaminants of concern found in sediment samples from the Grand River near the site, from the RI (1987).

Chemical Maximum Concentration
(ppm)
Comparison Value (soil)
(ppm)
cadmium 2.6 1E, Carcinogen
chromium 19 2,000R (III)
Carcinogen (VI)
methylene chloride 0.077 100E, 90C

Reference: 1

Only chemicals that were detected are listed

Bolded chemicals exceed comparison values.

(III)– For chromium(III)
(VI)– For chromium(VI)

NA – None Available
Carcinogen– Carcinogen (proven, probable, or possible) but no CREG available

Comparison Value Bases


RESPONSIVENESS STATEMENT

The Michigan Department of Public Health released a draft of this health assessment for public comments on March 8, 1991. The open comment period was in effect until April 8, 1991. During that time, one comment was received from an individual representing the City of Ionia regarding site remediation actions referred to in the health assessment and an associated press release. The health assessment information was checked and found to be accurate in representing the remedial plans. The press release, however, stated that remedial efforts included "capping the rest of the site" which is an overstatement of the situation. The remedy in the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Record of Decision actually calls for "upgrading the landfill cover and repairing the side slopes".

No other comments were received during the Public Comment Period.

The MDPH released a second draft of this Public Health Assessment for public comment on December 14, 1994. The comment period lasted until January 13, 1995. The MDPH received no additional comments in this period.


FOOTNOTES

1. Ingestion of soil may be incidental at any age, or a child may deliberately ingest soil (pica).

Table of Contents


Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1825 Century Blvd, Atlanta, GA 30345
Contact CDC: 800-232-4636 / TTY: 888-232-6348
 
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web Portal