PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT
MOUNTAIN PINE PRESSURE TREATING
PLAINVIEW, YELL COUNTY, ARKANSAS

Figure 1. Mountain Pine Pressure Treatment Site Map
Comparison Values Used In Screening Contaminants For Further Evaluation
Environmental Media Evaluation Guides (EMEGs) are developed for chemicals based on their toxicity, frequency of occurrence at National Priority List (NPL) sites, and potential for human exposure. They are derived to protect the most sensitive populations and are not action levels, but rather comparison values. They do not consider carcinogenic effects, chemical interactions, multiple route exposure, or other media-specific routes of exposure, and are very conservative concentration values designed to protect sensitive members of the population.
Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guides (RMEGs) are another type of comparison value derived to protect the most sensitive populations. They do not consider carcinogenic effects, chemical interactions, multiple route exposure, or other media-specific routes of exposure, and are very conservative concentration values designed to protect sensitive members of the population.
Cancer Risk Evaluation Guides (CREGs) are estimated contaminant concentrations based on a probability of one excess cancer in a million persons exposed to a chemical over a lifetime. These are also very conservative values designed to protect sensitive members of the population.
Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) have been established by USEPA for public water supplies to reduce the chances of adverse health effects from contaminated drinking water. These standards are well below levels for which health effects have been observed and take into account the financial feasibility of achieving specific contaminant levels. These are enforceable limits that public water supplies must meet.
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) is a non-enforceable drinking water health goal. There are no known or anticipated adverse effects on the health of persons drinking water containing concentrations at or below the MCLG.
TABLE 1: Concentrations of Contaminants of Concern in On-site Soil, Sediment, and Groundwater Samples, Mountain Pine Pressure Treating, Inc. Site, 1997.
| Constituent | Concentration Range (mg/kg) 1 | Health Based Comparison Value (mg/kg) |
|
SOIL AND SEDIMENT |
||
| Naphthalene | 0.36 | 1000(EMEG) 2 |
| Dibenzofuran | 0.32 | 230 (RMEG) 3 |
| Pentachlorophenol | 10.65 - 202 | 50 (EMEG) |
| Phenanthrene | 1 - 1.85 | 30000 (RMEG) |
| Benzo(a)anthracene | 0.28 | 0.62 (RMEG) |
| Chrysene | 0.25 | 62 (RMEG) |
| Arsenic | 6.6 - 2182 | 20 (EMEG) |
| Cadmium | 2.6 - 8.33 | 10 (EMEG) |
| Chromium (total) | 29.2 - 2984 | 200 (RMEG) |
| Copper | 8.4 - 2400 | 2900 (RMEG) |
| Nickel | 14.9 - 50.4 | 1000 (RMEG) |
| Lead | 30.3 - 211 | 400 (RMEG) |
| Zinc | 38.5 - 1152 | 20000 (EMEG) |
|
GROUNDWATER |
||
| Chromium | 0.0006 - 0.0017 | 0.03 (RMEG) |
| Copper | 0.01 | 1.3 (MCLG) 4 |
| Lead | 0.0015 | 0.015 (MCL) 5 |
| Zinc | 0.012 | 3 (EMEG) |
| Bold text
indicates a contaminant that exceeded ATSDR's Comparison Value in at least
one sample. 1 mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram 2 EMEG = Environmental Media Evaluation Guide 3 RMEG = Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guide 4 MCLG = Maximum Contaminant Level Goal 5 MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level |
||
Table 2: Polychlorinated Dioxins and Furans
Found in On-site Soil Samples, Mountain Pine Pressure Treating, Inc. Site, 1997.
| Constituent | Concentrations in parts per million (ppm) | |||||||||
| SS-3 | SS-4 | SS-5 | SS-6 | SS-7 | SS-9 | SS-10 | SS-11 | SS-13 | ||
| 2,3,7,8 TCDD 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 2 | 0 | 0.0009 | 0 | 0 | 1.76 | 5.658 | 0.0088 | 0.0022 | 0 | |
| 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.003 | 0.019 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF | 0 | 0 | 0.0032 | 0.0476 | 0.27 | 0 | 0.0023 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.0071 | 0.0725 | 0.33 | 0 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0 | |
| OCDD 5 | 0.0025 | 0.0074 | 0.2215 | 2.33 | 15.139 | 60.39 | 0.078 | 0.0295 | 0.0025 | |
| OCDF 6 | 0 | 0.00065 | 0.01 | 0.134 | 0.497 | 1.176 | 0.0039 | 0.0009 | 0 | |
| Total (ppm) | 0.0025 | 0.009 | 0.2418 | 2.5911 | 18.015 | 67.224 | 0.096 | 0.0336 | 0.0025 | |
| Toxicity Equivalent | ||||||||||
| Constituent | TEF 7 | |||||||||
| 2,3,7,8 TCDD | 1 | |||||||||
| 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD | 0.01 | 9.00e-06 | 1.76e-02 | 5.66e-02 | 8.80e-05 | 2.20e-05 | ||||
| 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF | 0.1 | 4.00e-04 | ||||||||
| 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF | 0.1 | 3.00e-04 | 1.90e-03 | |||||||
| 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF | 0.1 | 3.20e-04 | 4.76e-03 | 2.70e-02 | 7.36e-07 | |||||
| 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF | 0.01 | 7.10e-05 | 7.25e-04 | 3.30e-03 | 2.13e-07 | 7.10e-08 | ||||
| OCDD | 0.0001 | 2.50e-07 | 7.40e-07 | 2.22e-05 | 2.33e-04 | 1.51e-03 | 1.34e-03 | 1.73e-06 | 6.53e-07 | 5.54e-08 |
| OCDF | 0.0001 | 6.50e-08 | 1.00e-06 | 1.34e-05 | 4.97e-05 | 1.18e-06 | 3.90e-09 | 9.00e-10 | 0.00e+00 | |
| Total (ppm) | 2.50e-07 | 9.81e-06 | 4.14e-04 | 6.43e-03 | 5.14e-02 | 5.79e-02 | 9.07e-05 | 2.27e-05 | 5.54e-08 | |
| Total (ppb) 8 | 2.50e-04 | 9.80e-03 | 4.14e-01 | 6.43e+00 | 5.14e+01 | 1.34e+00 | 2.68e-03 | 7.25e-04 | 5.54e-05 | |
| Comparison Value (ppb) | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | |
| Bold text
indicates a contaminant that exceeded ATSDR's Comparison Value
in at least one sample 1 TCDD-tetra-chlorinated dioxin; 2 HpCDD-hepta-chlorinated dioxin; 3 HxCDF-hexa-chlorinated furan; 4 HpCDF-hepta-chlorinated furan; 5 OCDD-octa-chlorinated dioxin; 6 OCDF-octa-chlorinated furan; 7 TEF-toxicity equivalency factor; 8 ppb- parts per billion. |
||||||||||
Table 3: Polychlorinated Dioxins and Furans Found in Sediment
Samples, Mountain Pine Pressure Treating Inc. Site, February 22, 1993.
| Constituent |
Concentrations in parts per million (ppm) |
||||||||
| SD-1 | SD-2 | SD-3 | SD-4 | SD-5 | SD-6 | SD-7 | SD-8 | ||
| 2,3,7,8 TCDD 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0022 | 0.0013 | 0 | 0 | 0.0269 | 0 | |
| 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD | 0 | 0.0077 | 0.0011 | 0.0009 | 0 | 0 | 0.048 | 0 | |
| 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 3 | 0.0074 | 0 | 0.0513 | 0.0712 | 0 | 0 | 1.176 | 0.0218 | |
| 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0013 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF | 0 | 0 | 0.044 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | |
| 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF | 0 | 0 | 0.002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.0756 | 0.0213 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0118 | |
| 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF | 0 | 0 | 0.0018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| OCDD 6 | 0.0526 | 1.658 | 11.155 | 0.973 | 0.0078 | 0.0078 | 7.13 | 0.143 | |
| OCDF 7 | 0.0057 | 0.115 | 0.096 | 0.0269 | 0 | 0 | 0.305 | 0.007 | |
| Total (ppm) | 0.0657 | 1.7807 | 11.429 | 1.0959 | 0.0078 | 0.0078 | 8.6859 | 0.1876 | |
|
Toxicity Equivalent |
|||||||||
| Constituent | TEF 8 | ||||||||
| 2,3,7,8 TCDD | 1 | ||||||||
| 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD | 0.1 | 2.20e-04 | 1.30e-04 | 2.69e-03 | |||||
| 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD | 0.1 | 7.70e-04 | 1.10e-04 | 9.00e-05 | 4.80e-03 | ||||
| 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD | 0.01 | 7.40e-05 | 5.13e-04 | 7.12e-04 | 1.18e-02 | 2.18e-04 | |||
| 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF | 0.1 | ||||||||
| 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF | 0.1 | 1.30e-04 | |||||||
| 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF | 0.1 | 4.40e-03 | 4.00e-04 | ||||||
| 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF | 0.1 | 2.00e-04 | |||||||
| 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF | 0.01 | 7.56e-04 | 2.13e-04 | 1.18e-04 | |||||
| 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF | 0.01 | 1.80e-05 | |||||||
| OCDD | 0.0001 | 5.26e-06 | 1.66e-04 | 1.12e-03 | 9.73e-05 | 7.80e-07 | 7.80e-07 | 7.13e-04 | 1.43e-05 |
| OCDF | 0.0001 | 5.70e-07 | 1.15e-05 | 9.60e-06 | 2.69e-06 | 3.05e-05 | 7.00e-07 | ||
| Total (ppm) | 7.98e-05 | 9.47e-04 | 7.34e-03 | 1.38e-03 | 7.80e-07 | 7.80e-07 | 2.00e-02 | 7.51e-04 | |
| Total (ppb) 9 | 7.98e-02 | 9.47e-01 | 7.34e+00 | 1.37e+00 | 7.80e-04 | 7.80e-04 | 2.00e+01 | 7.51e-01 | |
| Comparison Value (ppb) | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | 5.00e-02 | |
| Bold text indicates
a contaminant that exceeded ATSDR's Comparison Value in at least one sample 1 TCDD-tetra-chlorinated dioxin; 2 HxCDD-hexa-chlorinated dioxin; 3 HpCDD-hepta-chlorinated dioxin; 4 HxCDF-hexa-chlorinated furan; 5 HpCDF-hepta-chlorinated furan; 6 OCDD-octa-chlorinated dioxin; 7 OCDF-octa-chlorinated furan; 8 TEF-toxicity equivalency factor; 9 ppb- parts per billion. |
|||||||||
TABLE 4: Nimrod Lake Sediment Samples, Mountain Pine Pressure
Treating Inc. Site; May 14, 1998.
| Constituent | Maximum Sediment concentration (mg/kg) 1 | Health based comparison value (mg/kg) | |
| Mouth Porter Creek | Vicinity of Water Intake | ||
| Aluminum | 23.3 | 19.3 | 100,000 (EMEG) 2 |
| Arsenic | 6.7 | 3.0 | 20 (RMEG) 3 |
| Barium | 0.156 | 0.137 | 4000 (RMEG) |
| Calcium | 537 | 461 | NA 4 |
| Chromium | 35.8 | 29.8 | 200 (RMEG) |
| Copper | ND | 0.7 | 2900 (RMEG) |
| Iron | 29.7 | 27.5 | 23000 (RMEG) |
| Magnesium | 1870 | 1620 | NA |
| Manganese | 0.56 | 0.55 | 3000 (RMEG) |
| Nickel | 34.9 | 31.7 | 1000 (RMEG) |
| Lead | 23.5 | 26.4 | 400 (RMEG) |
| Benzo(a)pyrene | 0.18 | ND 5 | 0.1 (CREG) 6 |
| OCDD 7 | 0.006 | 0.005 | NA |
| HpCDF 8 | 0.0048 | 0.00278 | NA |
| Bold text
indicates sample concentration that exceeded comparison value 1 mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram; 2 EMEG = Environmental Media Evaluation Guide; 3 RMEG = Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guide; 4 NA = not applicable (no comparison value has been established); 5 ND = not detected; 6 CREGs = Cancer Risk Evaluation Guides; 7 OCDD-octa-chlorinated dioxin; 8 .HpCDF-hepta-chlorinated furan. |
|||
TABLE 4 (continued): Toxicity Equivalents for Polychlorinated Dioxins and Furans,
Nemrod Lake Sediment Samples, Mountain Pine Pressure Treating Inc. Site, May
14, 1998.
| Constituent | Concentration (mg/kg) 1 | TEF 2 | TEQ 3 (ppb) 4 | Comparison Value (ppb) |
| OCDD 5 | 0.006 | 0.0001 | 0.000600 | 0.05 |
| HpCDF 6 | 0.0048 | 0.0001 | 0.000480 | 0.05 |
| 1 mg/kg -milligrams per kilogram; 2 TEF-toxicity equivalency factor; 3 TEQ-Toxicity equivalents (TEQ); 4 ppb-parts per billion; 5 OCDD-octa-chlorinated dioxin; 6 HpCDF-hepta-chlorinated furan. | ||||
TABLE 5: Nimrod Lake Fish Samples, Mountain Pine Pressure
Treating Inc. Site, May 14, 1998.
| Constituent | Maximum fish concentration (mg/kg) 1 from five samples | Estimated Ingestion Dose mg/kg/day 2 |
Health based comparison dose mg/kg /day |
|
| Mouth Porter Creek | Vicinity of Water Intake | |||
| Mercury | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.02 | 0.003 (MRL) 3 |
| Benzoic Acid | 0.2941 | 0.3370 | 0.009 | 4.0 (RfD) 4 |
| 4-chloro-3-methylphenol | 0.0434 | 0.0756 | 0.002 | 0.05 (MRL for p-cresols) |
| Naphthalene | 0.0143 | 0.0085 | 0.0003 | 0.02 (MRL) |
| Phenanthrene | 0.0155 | ND | 0.0005 | 2.6 (Cancer Effect Level for PAH 5) |
| Phenol | 0.0571 | 0.0794 | 0.002 | 0.003 (NOAEL6 : human) |
| 1 mg/kg- milligrams per kilogram; 2 mg/kg/day- milligrams per kilogram per day; 3 MRL- Minimal Risk Level; 4 RfD- reference dose; 5 PAH- polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; 6 NOAEL- no observed adverse effect level. | ||||
TABLE 6: Off-site Soil and Sediment Samples, Mountain Pine
Pressure Treating Inc. Site, Expanded Site Inspection: February 22, 1993.
| Constituent | Concentration Range (mg/kg) 1 | Health Based Comparison Value (mg/kg) | |
| SOIL | SEDIMENT | ||
| Arsenic | 7.4 - 14.0 | 11.4 - 53.3 | 0.5 (CREG 2) 0.6 (Pica child EMEG 3) 20 (EMEG) |
| Chromium (total) | 26.6 - 38.6 | 21.8 - 142.0 | 10 (Pica child EMEG) 200 (RMEG 4) |
| Copper | 9.6 - 17.3 | 6.4 - 25.9 | 2900 (RMEG) |
| Pentachlorophenol | ND 5 | ND - 1.10 | 6 (CREG) 50 (EMEG) |
| 1 mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram;2 CREG = Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide; 3 EMEG = Environmental Media Evaluation Guide; 4 RMEG = Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guide; 5 ND = not detected | |||
| Pathway Name | Contaminants of Concern | Source | Transport Media | Point of Exposure | Route of Exposure | Exposed Population | Time | Comments |
| Completed Exposure Pathway | ||||||||
| Off-site soil | Arsenic Chromium |
Process Operations | Soil | Residential yards School grounds |
Ingestion
|
Local Area residents | Past Present Future |
Data inadequate to assess the extent and magnitude of possible past or present exposures. Off-site soil is considered an indeterminate public health hazard because of limited information. |
| Potential Exposure Pathway | ||||||||
| On-site soil | Arsenic Chromium Pentachlorophenol |
Process Operations | Soil | Process area | Ingestion | Trespassers Workers |
Past Present Future |
Frequency, intensity, and duration of possible exposures considered adequate to result in exposure above levels of health concern. Soil considered to present a public health hazard. |
| Sediment | Arsenic Chromium Pentachlorophenol |
Process Operations | Leachate | Porter Creek Drainage ditches |
Ingestion | Local Area residents | Past Present Future |
Frequency, intensity, and duration of possible exposures considered inadequate to result in exposure above levels of health concern. Sediment considered to present no apparent public health hazard |
| Surface Water | Arsenic Chromium Pentachlorophenol Benzo[a]pyrene |
Process Operations | Surface Water | Porter Creek Fourche LaFave River Nimrod Lake |
Ingestion Dermal Contact |
Local Area residents | Past Present Future |
Frequency, intensity, and duration of possible exposures considered inadequate to result in exposure above levels of health concern. Surface water considered to present no apparent public health hazard. |
| Food chain | Benzo[a]pyrene Arsenic Beryllium Manganese |
Process Operations | Sediment Fish |
Off site | Ingestion | Local Area Residents | Past Present Future |
Frequency, intensity, and duration of possible exposures considered inadequate to result in exposure above levels of health concern. Food chain considered to present no apparent public health hazard. |
| Groundwater | Arsenic Chromium Copper Pentachlorophenol |
Infiltration | Groundwater | None Identified |
None Identified | None Identified | Past Current Future |
We were not able to identify any evidence of past or current human exposure to contaminated groundwater. Groundwater considered to present no public health hazard at this time. |
Calculation of Arsenic Exposure Dose
(On-site Soil and Sediment)
| Sample | Concentration in parts per million | 10 kilograms (kg) Child Dose | Child Dose | Adult Dose | Pica Child Dose |
| 1 | 6.6 | 0.0002 | 0.0001 | 0.0000 | 0.0029 |
| 2 | 8.5 | 0.0002 | 0.0001 | 0.0000 | 0.0037 |
| 3 | 13.7 | 0.0004 | 0.0001 | 0.0000 | 0.0060 |
| 4 | 13.8 | 0.0004 | 0.0001 | 0.0000 | 0.0060 |
| 5 | 15.4 | 0.0004 | 0.0001 | 0.0000 | 0.0067 |
| 6 | 15.6 | 0.0004 | 0.0001 | 0.0000 | 0.0068 |
| 7 | 16.9 | 0.0005 | 0.0001 | 0.0000 | 0.0074 |
| 8 | 19.4 | 0.0005 | 0.0002 | 0.0000 | 0.0085 |
| 9 | 36.5 | 0.0010 | 0.0003 | 0.0001 | 0.0160 |
| 10 | 38.0 | 0.0011 | 0.0003 | 0.0001 | 0.0166 |
| 11 | 51.5 | 0.0014 | 0.0005 | 0.0001 | 0.0225 |
| 12 | 77.4 | 0.0022 | 0.0007 | 0.0002 | 0.0339 |
| 13 | 85.4 | 0.0024 | 0.0007 | 0.0002 | 0.0374 |
| 14 | 176.0 | 0.0049 | 0.0015 | 0.0004 | 0.0770 |
| 15 | 187.0 | 0.0052 | 0.0016 | 0.0004 | 0.0818 |
| 16 | 307.0 | 0.0086 | 0.0027 | 0.0006 | 0.1343 |
| 17 | 751.0 | 0.0210 | 0.0066 | 0.0015 | 0.3286 |
| 18 | 894.0 | 0.0250 | 0.0078 | 0.0018 | 0.3911 |
| 19 | 2027.0 | 0.0568 | 0.0177 | 0.0041 | 0.8868 |
| 20 | 2117.0 | 0.0593 | 0.0185 | 0.0042 | 0.9262 |
| 21 | 2182.0 | 0.0611 | 0.0191 | 0.0044 | 0.9546 |
| Mean | 430.5 | 0.0121 | 0.0038 | 0.0009 | 0.1883 |
| Bold text numbers are values that exceeded the ATSDR Health Guidelines | |||||
| Assumptions: Child:10 kg ingesting 200 milligrams (mg) soil Child: 16 kg ingesting 100 mg soil Adult: 70 kg ingesting 100 mg soil Pica : 16 kg ingesting 5,000 mg soil |
Dose Calculation: EF = 0.0000014 (5 days/week for 1 year) |
||||
Calculation of Chromium Exposure Dose
(On-site Soil and Sediment)
| Sample | Concentration in parts per million | 10 kilograms (kg) child Dose | Child Dose | Adult Dose | Pica Child Dose |
| 1 | 29.2 | 0.0008 | 0.0003 | 0.0001 | 0.0128 |
| 2 | 35.2 | 0.0010 | 0.0003 | 0.0001 | 0.0154 |
| 3 | 44.9 | 0.0013 | 0.0004 | 0.0001 | 0.0197 |
| 4 | 46.5 | 0.0013 | 0.0004 | 0.0001 | 0.0203 |
| 5 | 48.9 | 0.0014 | 0.0004 | 0.0001 | 0.0214 |
| 6 | 51.0 | 0.0014 | 0.0004 | 0.0001 | 0.0223 |
| 7 | 51.0 | 0.0014 | 0.0004 | 0.0001 | 0.0223 |
| 8 | 62.0 | 0.0017 | 0.0005 | 0.0001 | 0.0271 |
| 9 | 66.0 | 0.0018 | 0.0006 | 0.0001 | 0.0289 |
| 10 | 83.8 | 0.0023 | 0.0007 | 0.0002 | 0.0367 |
| 11 | 115.4 | 0.0032 | 0.0010 | 0.0002 | 0.0505 |
| 12 | 140.0 | 0.0039 | 0.0012 | 0.0003 | 0.0613 |
| 13 | 155.0 | 0.0043 | 0.0014 | 0.0003 | 0.0678 |
| 14 | 156.0 | 0.0044 | 0.0014 | 0.0003 | 0.0683 |
| 15 | 286.0 | 0.0080 | 0.0025 | 0.0006 | 0.1251 |
| 16 | 656.0 | 0.0184 | 0.0057 | 0.0013 | 0.2870 |
| 17 | 715.0 | 0.0200 | 0.0063 | 0.0014 | 0.3128 |
| 18 | 1747.0 | 0.0489 | 0.0153 | 0.0035 | 0.7643 |
| 19 | 2100.0 | 0.0588 | 0.0184 | 0.0042 | 0.9188 |
| 20 | 2904.0 | 0.0813 | 0.0254 | 0.0058 | 1.2705 |
| 21 | 2984.0 | 0.0836 | 0.0261 | 0.0060 | 1.3055 |
| Mean | 594.1 | 0.0166 | 0.0052 | 0.0012 | 0.2599 |
| Bold text numbers are values that exceeded the ATSDR Health Guidelines | |||||
| Assumptions: Child:10 kg ingesting 200 milligrams (mg) soil Child: 16 kg ingesting 100 mg soil Adult: 70 kg ingesting 100 mg soil Pica : 16 kg ingesting 5,000 mg soil |
Dose Calculation: EF = 0.0000014 (5 days/week for 1 year) |
||||
ATSDR defines an exposure pathway as having 5 parts:
When all 5 parts of an exposure pathway are present, it is called a Completed Exposure Pathway. Each of these 5 terms is defined in this Glossary.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Public Health Conclusion Categories
| CATEGORY A. URGENT PUBLIC HEALTH HAZARD This category is used for sites that pose an urgent public health hazard as the result of short-term exposures to hazardous substances. Criteria: |
CATEGORY B. PUBLIC HEALTH HAZARD This category is used for sites that pose a public health hazard as the result of long-term exposures to hazardous substances. Criteria: |
CATEGORY C. INDETERMINATE PUBLIC HEALTH HAZARD This category is used for sites with incomplete information. Criteria: |
CATEGORY D. NO APPARENT PUBLIC HEALTH HAZARD This category is used for sites where human exposure to contaminated media is occurring or has occurred in the past, but the exposure is below a level of health hazard. Criteria: |
CATEGORY E. NO PUBLIC HEALTH HAZARD This category is used for sites that do not pose a public health hazard. Criteria: |