PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT
PEMACO MAYWOOD
MAYWOOD, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Table 1. Chemicals Stored in Underground Storage Tanks at the Pemaco Site
| Chemical Name (in storage tanks) |
| Methanol |
| Ethanol |
| Xylene |
| Propylene glycol |
| 2-Ethoxy ethyl acetate |
| Isopropyl acetate |
| Isophorone |
| Ethyl acetate |
| Bending tank |
| 1-Butanol |
| n-Butyl Acetate |
| MV&P Naphtha |
| Kerosine |
| Tolusol 6 |
| Mineral sprits 350H |
| n-Hexane |
| Isopropanol |
| 2-Butanone (Methyl ethyl ketone, MEK) |
| 2-Butoxyethanol |
| Toluene |
| Acetone |
Table 2. Identity and Quantity of Waste
Chemicals in Drum Storage Area of the Pemaco Site
| Waste in Drums | Quantity (Gal) | Haz | Waste in Drums | Quantity (Gal) | Haz | Waste in Drums | Quantity (Gal) | Haz |
| Acetone | 382 | Y | Water insoluble | 29 | IPA 99% | 37 | ||
| Ketone | 125 | Y | Water soluble | 52 | Dxitol | 34 | ||
| Toluene | 59 | Y | Orange | 66 | Water and solvent | 40 | ||
| Methanol | 348 | Y | IPA; hexane; TCLG | 24 | Y | Water junk | 48 | |
| Emuls | 17 | n-Butyl Alcohol; VMP; | 53 | Y | n-propanal | 40 | Y | |
| Methyl isobutyl ketone | 16 | Y | Yellow | 108 | Alc. Oxitol; 360 | 15 | ||
| s-Butyl alcohol | 37 | LMILS; MS | 55 | Perc. MS; xylene | 9 | Y | ||
| n-Propyl acetate | 165 | Violert | 55 | Ethyl alcohol | 38 | |||
| Isopropyl ac: NPAC | 110 | Light yellow | 106 | Xylene | 25 | Y | ||
| Water | 85 | VM&P | 201 | Y | IPA LAC Dil MS | 43 | ||
| Methyl Oxytol | 12 | n-Butyl/MS | 12 | Y | Water with oil | 52 | ||
| SOL 71 or 72 | 23 | EMILs | 39 | Butyl alcohol | 19 | Y | ||
| Npalo | 48 | IMIL; MS | 53 | ARASOL 200/TRI | 17 | Y | ||
| Methyl oxitol | 11 | Xylene; ms | 55 | Y | TC 53 | 8 | ||
| Ethyl alcohol; SBA | 29 | EMILs; SOL360 | 55 | Mixed hexane | 42 | Y | ||
| Ethyl acetate85%-88% | 55 | Y | Amyl acetate | 51 | Y | Methyl ethyl ketone | 57 | Y |
| IPA, VMP | 12 | Y | Xylenes; TOL | 42 | Y | Junk | 53 | |
| Butyl ox: water | 50 | CS53; ms | 18 | Ethylene glycol | 92 | Y | ||
| Butyl acetate; 111TRI | 52 | Y | TOL | 18 | Y | Glycol butyl | 12 | |
| Methyl alcohol; IPA; MEK | 205 | Y | NPALC; MS | 55 | EB Contam/water | 12 | Y | |
| Iosesine | 110 | Y | N. But. Ac 100 | 25 | Y | LAC fDIL 1360 | 60 |
Taken from the June 1992 Hazardous Materials Business Plan
Haz = Is the chemical considered hazardous?
Table 3. Near-surface Soil Sampling Results
from the Pemaco Site
| Concentration of Analytes (µg/kg) | ||||||||
Acetone |
Methyl Ethyl Ketone | 1,1,1-Tri-chloroethane | Trichloro- ethylene | Methyl Iso-butyl Ketone | Ethylbenzene |
Xylene |
Tetrachloro-ethylene | |
| Adult EMEG (ug/kg) | 1,000,000,000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 70,000,000 | 100,000,000 | 7,000,000 |
| Child EMEG (ug/kg) | 100,000,000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 5,000,000 | 10,000,000 | 500,000 |
| CREG (µg/Kg) | NA | NA | NA | 60,000 | NA | NA | NA | 10,000 |
| Sample Location | ||||||||
| NSB-103 | 400 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 |
| NSB-104 | 17 | 3J | <11 | <11 | 2J | <11 | <11 | <11 |
| NSB-105 | 79,000 | 12,000 | <5,500 | <5,500 | 2,700J | 2,100J | 15,000 | 210J |
| NSB-106 | 70Ja | 5J | <11 | <11 | 1J | <11 | 5J | <11 |
| NSB-107 | 180J | 7J | <13 | <13 | 0.8J | <13 | 19 | <13 |
| NSB-108 | 24 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | 1J | 6J | <11 |
| NSB-109 | 200 | 22 | <13 | <13 | 2J | 0.8J | 5J | <13 |
| NSB-110 | 130 | 5J | <13 | <13 | <13 | <13 | <13 | <13 |
| NSB-111 | 30 | 5J | <13 | <13 | <13 | <13 | <13 | <13 |
| NSB-112 | 19 | <12 | <12 | <12 | <12 | <12 | <12 | <12 |
| NSB-115 | 39 | 6J | <12 | <12 | <12 | <12 | <12 | <12 |
| NSB-116 | 19 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 |
| NSB-117 | 17 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 |
| NSB-119 | 28 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 |
| NSB-120 | 12 | <11 | <11 | 28 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 |
| NSB-121 | 20 | 2J | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 | <11 |
NA = Value not available
J = Value did not meet all quality assurance criteria, and is a estimate only
a = The estimated value greatly exceeded the sample quantitation limit, so the
analyte is presumed to be in sample
< = Not detected at the given sample quantitation limit
Table 4. Subsurface Soil Sampling from the
Pemaco Site
| Depth (feet below ground surface) | Acetone (ug/kg) | 1,1-Dichloroethane (ug/kg) | 1,2-Dichloroethylene (ug/kg) | Trichloroethylene (ug/kg) | |
| Adult EMEG (ug/kg) | 1,000,000,000 | NA | 100,000,000 | NA | |
| Child EMEG (ug/kg) | 100,000,000 | NA | 10,000,000 | NA | |
| CREG (µg/kg) | NA | NA | NA | 60,000 | |
| Borehole | |||||
| MW-1 | 10 | <20 | <14 | <14 | <14 |
| 20 | <2,900 | <1,700 | <1,700 | <1,700 | |
| 30 | <980 | <140 | <140 | <140 | |
| 50 | <400 | <140 | <140 | <140 | |
| 60 | <1,800 | <140 | <140 | <140 | |
| 70 | <570 | <130 | <140 | <140 | |
| 80 | <2,000 | <130 | <140 | <130 | |
| 85 | <1,800 | <130 | <130 | <130 | |
| 90 | <14 | <14 | <14 | <14 | |
| MW-2 | 10 | <220 | 34J | 160 | <120 |
| 20 | 2,300Ja | <120 | <120 | <120 | |
| 30 | 660Ja | <62 | 200 | 10J | |
| 40 | <46 | <11 | 3J | <11 | |
| 50 | <76 | <12 | <12 | <12 | |
| 60 | <79 | <12 | <12 | 1J | |
| 70 | <1,500 | <130 | <130 | 16J | |
| 75 | 130Ja | <12 | <12 | 80 | |
| 80 | <79 | <13 | <13 | 120 | |
| 90 | <870 | <13 | 5J | 80 | |
| SSB-1 | 10 | <16 | <12 | <12 | <12 |
| 20 | <380 | <79 | <79 | <79 | |
| 25 | <3,000 | <1,800 | <1,800 | <1,800 | |
| 30 | <5,000 | <1,800 | <1,800 | <1,800 | |
| 40 | <610 | <150 | 61J | <150 | |
| 50 | <130 | <12 | <12 | <12 | |
| 60 | <320 | <78 | 47J | <78 | |
| 65 | <160 | <16 | 54 | <16 | |
| 70 | <1,500 | <150 | <150 | <150 | |
| 80 | <1,800 | <160 | <160 | <160 | |
| 90 | <820 | <74 | <74 | <74 | |
| SSB-2 | 10 | <72 | <14 | <14 | <14 |
| 20 | <120 | 5J | <14 | <14 | |
| 30 | <1,100 | <150 | <150 | <150 | |
| 40 | <680 | 37J | <77 | 85 | |
| 50 | <600 | <130 | <130 | <130 | |
| 60 | 570Ja | <30 | <30 | <30 | |
| 70 | <600 | <140 | <140 | <140 | |
| 80 | <370 | <30 | <30 | <30 | |
| 85 | <91 | <14 | <14 | <14 | |
| 90 | <890 | <140 | <140 | <140 | |
| SSB-3 | 15 | <150,000 | <150,000 | 30,000J | 1,200,000 |
| 20 | <14,000 | <14,000 | 1,900J | 59,000J | |
| 30 | 17,000 | <1,400 | <1,400 | 440J | |
| 40 | <35 | <11 | 14 | 1J | |
| 50 | |||||
| 60 | <46 | <12 | 26 | 150 | |
| 70 | 700Ja | <13 | 5J | 200 | |
| 80 | <460 | <64 | <64 | 70 | |
| 90 | <250 | <59 | <59 | <59 | |
| 95 | 190Ja | <15 | <15 | <15 | |
| SSB-4 | 10 | <76 | <13 | <13 | <13 |
| 20 | <780 | <74 | <74 | <74 | |
| 30 | 510Ja | <29 | 18J | 91 | |
| 40 | <3,400 | <2,000 | <2,000 | <2,000 | |
| 50 | <140 | <14 | 5J | 64Ja | |
| 60 | <210 | <15 | <15 | 330 | |
| 70 | <250 | <70 | <70 | 220 | |
| 80 | <280 | <77 | <77 | 990Ja | |
| 85 | <140 | <140 | <140 | 560 | |
| 90 | <360 | <33 | <33 | <33 |
NA = Value not available; J = Value is an estimate because
analysis did not meet all quality assurance criteria
a= The estimated value greatly exceeded the sample quantitation limit so the
analyte is presumed to be present in the sample
b = The analytical holding time for this sample was exceeded, so the actual
concentration is likely greater
Soil samples from boreholes MW-1 and MW-2 were labeled as SMW-1 and SMW-2 depth
Table 5. Characteristics of Wells in the
Perched Groundwater at the Pemaco Site
| Well | Depth to Water (below TOC) |
Depth of Well (feet below ground surface) |
Clay Layer Depth (feet below ground surface) |
| B-1 | 29.45 | 35 | 30 |
| B-4 | 25.22 | 40 | 33 |
| B-5 | 26.60 | 40 | 29 |
| B-7 | 25.91 | 32 | None |
| B-8 | 27.84 | No log | No log |
| B-10 | 26.20 | 35 | 25-30 and 35+ |
| B-11 | 23.49 | 25 | 24+ |
| B-12 | 22.58 | 25 | None |
| B-14 | 21.37 | 33 | 30 |
| B-15 | No record | 40 | 30 |
Table 6. Perched Groundwater Sampling
| Analyte* | Adult EMEG (ug/L) | Child EMEG (ug/L) | CREG (µg/L) |
B-1-P |
B-4-P |
B-5-P |
B-7-P |
B-8-P |
B-10-P |
B-11-P |
B-12-P |
B-14-P |
B-15-P |
| Benzene | NA | NA | 1 | 6J | 39J | 20 | 170 | 34 | 19 | 4J | 10U | 24Jb | 32 |
| Chloroethane | NA | NA | NA | 20U | 20J | 13 | 2J | 9J | 28 | 18 | 10U | 61 | 58 |
| 1,1-Dichloroethane | NA | NA | NA | 60 | 55J | 10U | 5J | 170 | 150Ja | 13 | 10U | 10U | 3J |
| 1,1-Dichloroethylene | 300 | 90 | 0.06 | 36 | 50U | 10U | 10U | 20U | 10U | 10U | 10U | 10U | 10U |
| 1,2-Dichloroethylene | 7,000 | 2,000 | NA | 350 | 50U | 3J | 3J | 20U | 29 | 88 | 17 | 2J | 1J |
| Ethylbenzene | 4,00 | 1,000 | NA | 20U | 250 | 110 | 170 | 270 | 48 | 7J | 10U | 2J | 7J |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 400 | 100 | 0.7 | 22 | 50U | 10U | 10U | 20U | 10U | 10U | 10U | 10U | 10U |
| Toluene | 700 | 200 | NA | 200 | 12J | 4J | 2J | 13J | 47 | 7J | 10U | 10U | 2J |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | NA | NA | NA | 90 | 50U | 10U | 10U | 20U | 10U | 10U | 10U | 10U | 10U |
| Trichloroethylene | NA | NA | 3 | 9J | 50U | 8J | 10U | 20U | 10U | 10U | 180 | 1J | 6J |
| Vinyl Chloride | 0.7 | 0.2 | NA | 44 | 50U | 2J | 39 | 290 | 4J | 3J | 10U | 10U | 10U |
| Xylene | 7,000 | 2,000 | NA | 20U | 720 | 130 | 240 | 6J | 22 | 3J | 10U | 28Jb | 22 |
* Concentrations presented in micrograms per liter or parts
per billion (ppb)
NA = Value not available
Sample B-1-P was collected from Well B-1, B-4-P from B-4, etc.
U = Undetected at the sample quantitation limit
J = Value is an estimate because analysis did not meet all quality assurance
criteria
a = The estimated value greatly exceeded the sample quantitation limit, so the
analyte is assumed to be in the sample
b = Results are estimated due to missed holding time and inadequate sample preservation;
actual concentration would be expected to be greater than the reported concentration
Table 7. Thermal Oxidizer Test Data
| Chemical | Test Run 1 | Test Run 2 | Test Run 3 |
| Dibromochloropropane | <6.44 X 10-4 | <5.94 X 10-4 | <5.29 X 10-4 |
| Benzene | <2.70 X 10-4 | <3.59 X 10-4 | <3.51 X 10-4 |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | <1.98 X 10-4 | <1.82 X 10-4 | <1.78 X 10-4 |
| Chlorobenzene | <2.70 X 10-4 | <2.49 X 10-4 | <2.44 X 10-4 |
| Chloroform | <2.53 X 10-4 | <2.33 X 10-4 | <2.28 X 10-4 |
| Ethylenedibromide | <1.62 X 10-4 | <1.49 X 10-4 | <2.11 X 10-4 |
| Hydrochloric Acid | 33.9 | 37.5 | 37.7 |
| Methylene Chloride | 6.15 X 10-4 | 1.19 X 10-3 | 8.09 X 10-4 |
| Naphthalene | <1.19 X 10-3 | <1.09 X 10-3 | <1.07 X 10-3 |
| Styrene | <2.92 X 10-4 | <2.69 X 10-4 | <2.63 X 10-4 |
| Toluene | 4.07 X 10-4 | 2.76 X 10-4 | <2.98 X 10-4 |
| Trichloroethylene | <2.32 X 10-4 | <2.14 X 10-4 | <2.09 X 10-4 |
| Vinyl chloride | <4.87 X 10-4 | <4.49 X 10-4 | <4.39 X 10-4 |
| Xylenes | <2.87 X 10-4 | <2.64 X 10-4 | <2.58 X 10-4 |
Each run concentration is an average concentrations for four
probes (ppm/v) (3)
< = detection limit value
Table 8. Health Interpretation of Estimated
Concentrations in Thermal Oxidizer Stack Emissions
| Comparison Values | Calculated Annual Max Concentration (µg/m3) at | Hazard Index (Adults) | Increased Lifetime Cancer Risk | |||||
| Chemical | Unit Risk (µg/m3) -1 | Ref. Conc (µg/m3) | MEIa | Heliotrope School | MEIa | Heliotrope School | MEIa | Heliotrope School |
| Dibromochloropropane | 0.02 | 2 x 10-4 | 5.55 x 10-5 | 4.14 x 10-6 | 0.28 | 2.1 x 10-4 | 1.1 x 10-7 | 8.3 x 10-9 |
| Benzene | 2.9 x 10-5 | 12.8 | 1.11 x 10-5 | 8.28 x 10-7 | 8.7 x 10-4 | 6.5 x 10-8 | 3.2 x 10-10 | 2.4 x 10-11 |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | 4.2 x 10-5 | 315 | 1.11 x 10-5 | 8.28 x 10-7 | 3.5 x 10-8 | 2.6 x 10-9 | 4.7 x 10-10 | 3.5 x 10-11 |
| Chlorobenzene | NA | NA | 1.11 x 10-5 | 8.28 x 10-7 | ||||
| Chloroform | 2.3 x 10-5 | 97.7 | 1.11 x 10-5 | 8.28 x 10-7 | 1.1 x 10-7 | 8.5 x 10-9 | 2.6 x10-10 | 1.9 x 10-11 |
| Ethylenedibromide | 2.2 x 10-4 | 38.4 | 1.54 x 10-5 | 1.15 x 10-6 | 4.0 x 10-7 | 3.0 x 10-10 | 3.4 x 10-9 | 2.5 x 10-10 |
| Hydrochloric Acid | NA | 20 | 5.33 x 10-1 | 3.98 x 10-2 | 2.7 x 10-2 | 2.0 x 10-8 | ||
| Methylene Chloride | 1 x 10-6 | 104 | 3.89 x 10-5 | 2.90 x 10-6 | 3.7 x 10-7 | 2.8 x 10-1 | 3.9 x 10-11 | 2.9 x 10-12 |
| Naphthalene | NA | 10.5 | 5.55 x 10-5 | 4.14 x 10-6 | 5.2 x 10-6 | 3.9 x 10-9 | ||
| Styrene | NA | 256 | 1.11 x 10-5 | 8.28 x 10-7 | 4.3 x 10-8 | 3.2 x 10-9 | ||
| Toluene | NA | 3,770 | 1.37 x 10-5 | 1.02 x 10-6 | 3.6 x 10-9 | 2.7 x 10-12 | ||
| Trichloroethylene | 2 x 10-6 | 537 | 1.11 x 10-5 | 8.28 x 10-7 | 2.1 x 10-8 | 1.5 x 10-9 | 2.2 x 10-10 | 1.6 x 10-12 |
| Vinyl Chloride | 7.8 x 10-5 | 76.7 | 1.11 x 10-5 | 8.28 x 10-7 | 1.4 x 10-7 | 1.1 x 10-8 | 8.6 x 10-10 | 6.4 x 10-11 |
| Xylenes | NA | 434 | 1.11 x 10-5 | 8.28 x 10-7 | 2.6 x 10-8 | 1.9 x 10-9 | ||
|
|
||||||||
| Total | 0.304 | 2.1 x 10-4 | 1.2 x 10-7 | 8.7 x 10-9 | ||||
NA = Value not available
aMEI = Maximum Exposed Individual
Table 9. Completed Exposure Pathways for
Pemaco Maywood Site
| Pathway Name | Source | Medium | Exposure Point | Exposure Route | Receptor Population | Time of Exposure | Exposure Activities |
| Adults exposed to contamination through inhalation of stack emissions from the thermal oxidizer | Thermal oxidizer | Air | Homes located near Pemaco Site
Heliotrope School |
Inhalation of emissions from thermal oxidizer | Adult and child residents of neighborhood near Pemaco
Site
Adult staff and students at Heliotrope school |
Recent past (thermal oxidizer shut down) | Daily activities at the home or school |
Table 10. Potentially Completed Exposure
Pathways for Pemaco Maywood Site
| Pathway Name | Source | Medium | Exposure Point | Exposure Route | Receptor Population | Time of Exposure | Exposure Activities |
| Residents exposed to contamination through inhalation of soil gas from contaminated shallow groundwater | Contamination from leaking drums, leaking storage tanks reaching shallow groundwater and creating soil gas | Soil gas | Buildings near Pemaco Site over contaminated shallow groundwater | Inhalation of soil gas that has migrated into buildings | Adult and child residents | Past
Present Future |
Daily activities |
| Residents exposed to contamination through inhalation of fugitive vapors from storage tanks and drums | Leaking drums at facility Leaking storage tanks at facility |
Air | Buildings located near Pemaco facility
Heliotrope School |
Inhalation of vapors from leaking drums, storage tanks | Adult and child residents of neighborhood near Pemaco
facility
Adult staff and children at Heliotrope school |
Past (drums, storage tanks, no longer present) | Daily activities at the home or school
|
Table 11. Eliminated Exposure Pathways
for Pemaco Maywood Site
| Pathway Name | Source | Medium | Exposure Point | Exposure Route | Receptor Population | Time of Exposure | Exposure Activities |
| Residents exposed to contamination through incidental ingestion of contaminated surface soil | Airborne contamination from Pemaco Site deposited onto the ground and emissions from the former incinerator | Surface soil | Yards of homes near Pemaco Site | Incidental ingestion of contaminated soil | Adult and child residents of homes near Pemaco Site | Past
Present Future |
Recreational activities
Working in home garden |
| Residents exposed to contamination through ingestion of contaminated homegrown produce | Airborne contamination from Pemaco Site deposited onto the ground and emissions from the former incinerator | Home-grown produce, eggs, chickens | Yards of homes near Pemaco Site | Ingestion of contaminated produce, eggs, and chickens | Adult and child residents of homes near Pemaco Site | Past
Present Future |
Eating homegrown produce, eggs, chickens |
| Trespassers exposed to contamination through incidental ingestion of contaminated surface soil on site | Contamination from leaking drums, storage tanks, that used to be on site | Surface soil, concrete pad | Pemaco Site | Incidental ingestion and dermal contact with contaminated soil | Adults and children trespassing onto Pemaco Site | Past
Present Future |
Children's play activities |
| Residents exposed to contamination in ground water | Contamination from drums storage tanks, reaching ground water | Ground water | Homes near Pemaco Site using municipal or private well water | Ingestion and inhalation of contaminants from tap water | Adult and child residents | Past
Present Future |
Drinking water |
| Residents exposed to contamination from the site through exposure to contaminated surface runoff from the site | Leaking drums at facility
Leaking storage tanks at facility |
Surface runoff - storm drains flow to LA River | Los Angeles River | Los Angeles River channel | Adult and child residents of neighborhood near Pemaco facility | Past (drums, tanks, no longer on site, leaks can no longer drain to river channel | Residents playing or engaging in other activities in the channel |
On March 21, 2001, copies of this PHA were sent to agencies, community groups, and community members. Approximately 5 weeks (March 21, 2001 to April 23, 2001) were allotted to the public to comment on this document. Copies of this document were placed in the Maywood Public Library for all interested parties to review. During the public comment period, CDHS received no written comments.