PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT
SAYREVILLE LANDFILL
SAYREVILLE, MIDDLESEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Figure 1. General Site Location
Table 1. Range of Contaminant Levels in On-site Drum Samples
| Contaminant | Range of Levels (ppm) | Comparison Value | |
| ppm | Source | ||
|
|
|||
| Volatile Organics: | |||
|
Benzene |
35 | 0.0012 | CREG |
|
Chlorobenzene |
1.1J | 0.004 | NJ MCL |
|
Chloroethane |
ND | ||
|
Ethylbenzene |
0.43J-220 | 3.5 | RfD |
|
4-Methyl 2 pentanone |
ND | ||
|
Vinyl Acetate |
ND | ||
|
Vinyl Chloride |
ND | ||
|
Xylenes |
0.32J-1200 | 0.044 | NJ MCL |
|
|
|||
| Benzo(a)pyrene | 0.022J-0.087J | 0.000006 | CREG |
|
BEHP |
0.29J-110BJ | 0.0025 | CREG |
|
Di-n-octylphthalate |
ND | ||
|
2-Methylphenol |
17J-35J | 1.8 | RfD |
|
4-Methylphenol |
370 | none | none |
| Napthalene | 0.15J-620 | 0.02 | LTHA |
|
Phenanthrene |
260J | none | none |
|
Phenol |
68J-81,000J | 21 | RfD |
| Pesticides: | |||
|
Aldrin |
ND | ||
|
Heptachlor |
ND | ||
|
Metals: |
|||
|
Antimony |
NA | ||
| Arsenic | 1.3-6.6 | 0.011 | RfD |
|
Cadmium |
4.7-131 | 0.007 | EMEG |
|
Chromium |
6.5-45.9 | 0.18 | RfD |
| Lead | 2.7-1500 | 0.05 | EPA MCL |
|
Nickel |
4.1-152 | 0.1 | LTHA |
EMEG-ATSDR Environmental Media Evaluation Guide
CREG-ATSDR Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide
RfD-USEPA Reference Dose
LTHA-USEPA Drinking Water Lifetime Health Advisory
EPA MCL-USEPA Maximum Contaminant Level
NJ MCL-New Jersey Maximum Contaminant Level
ppm-parts per million
ND-not detected
NA-not analyzed
J-estimated value
Source: NJDEP Final Report Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, March 1990.
Table 2. Range of Contaminant Levels in On-site Subsurface Soil Samples
| Contaminant | Range of Levels (ppm) | Comparison Value | |
|
ppm |
Source | ||
|
|
|||
| Volatile Organics: | |||
| Benzene | 0.001J-0.016 | 24 | CREG |
| Chlorobenzene | 0.01-0.21 | 14,000 | RfD |
|
Chloroethane |
ND | ||
|
Ethylbenzene |
0.005-0.52 | 70,000 | RfD |
|
4 Methyl 2 pentanone |
0.01B | none | none |
|
Vinyl Acetate |
0.02-0.16J | none | none |
|
Vinyl Chloride |
ND | ||
|
Xylenes |
0.05-2.4 | 1,400,000 | RfD |
|
Semi-Volatile Organics: |
|||
|
Benzo(a)pyrene |
0.49J-6.3 | 0.12 | CREG |
|
BEHP |
0.68-4.1 | 50 | CREG |
|
Di-n-octylphthalate |
ND | ||
|
2-Methylphenol |
ND | ||
|
4-Methylphenol |
5 | none | none |
|
Napthalene |
ND | ||
|
Phenanthrene |
1.3-18J | none | none |
|
Phenol |
0.0001-0.002 | 420,000 | RfD |
|
Pesticides: |
|||
|
Aldrin |
4.39 | 0.041 | CREG |
|
Heptachlor |
0.004J-3.98B | 0.16 | CREG |
|
Metals: |
|||
| Antimony | 14.1-23.3 | 10 | NJSAL |
| Arsenic | 2.1-19.2 | 20 | NJSAL |
|
Cadmium |
1.2-7.9 | 3 | NJSAL |
|
Chromium |
2.6-50 | 100 | NJSAL |
|
Lead |
3.8-65.7 | 250-1000 | NJSAL |
|
Nickel |
8.0-39.3 | 100 | NJSAL |
CREG-ATSDR Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide
RfD-USEPA Reference Dose
NJSAL-New Jersey Soil Action Level
ppm-parts per million
ND-not detected
J-estimated value
B-found in the associated blank as well as in the sample
Source: NJDEP Final Report Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, March 1990.
Table 3. Range of Contaminant Levels in On-site Ground-Water Samples
| Contaminant | Range of Levels (ppm) | Comparison Value | ||||
|
Waste Fill/ |
Shallow Aquifer |
Intermediate Aquifer |
Deep Aquifer |
ppm | Source | |
|
|
||||||
|
Volatile Organics: |
||||||
| Benzene | 0.01-0.19 | 0.001J-0.006* | ND | 0.001J | 0.0012 | CREG |
|
Chlorobenzene |
0.008-0.05 | 0.004J | ND | ND | 0.004 | NJMCL |
|
Chloroethane |
0.004J-0.32 | 0.002J-7.3 | ND | ND | none | none |
|
Ethylbenzene |
0.005-0.2 | ND | 0.002J | ND | 3.5 | RfD |
| 4-Methyl-2-pentanone |
0.02 |
ND | ND | ND | none | none |
|
Vinyl Acetate |
0.006J-0.02 | ND | ND | ND | none | none |
|
Vinyl Chloride |
0.004J | ND | ND | ND | 0.002 | NJMCL |
|
Xylenes |
0.002J-1.1 | 0.004J-0.16 | ND | ND | 0.044 | NJMCL |
|
Semi-Volatile Organics: |
||||||
|
Benzo(a)pyrene |
0.013B | 0.011B-0.013 | ND | 0.012B-0.013B | 0.000006 | CREG |
|
BEHP |
0.005-0.35 | 0.002-0.032B | ND | 0.004 | 0.0025 | CREG |
|
Di-n-octyl |
ND | 0.007J-11 | ND | ND | none | none |
|
2-Methylphenol |
0.096-3.1 | ND | ND | ND | 1.8 | RfD |
|
4-Methylphenol |
0.002-0.22 | 0.009J | ND | ND | none | none |
|
Napthalene |
0.005J-0.04 | 0.007J | 0.01J | ND | 0.02 | LTHA |
|
Phenanthrene |
0.013 | ND | ND | ND | none | none |
|
Phenol |
0.02-2.3 | ND | ND | ND | 21 | RfD |
|
Pesticides: |
||||||
|
Aldrin |
0.001 | ND | ND | ND | 0.0000021 | CREG |
|
Heptachlor |
0.0002-0.001 | ND | ND | ND | 0.0000078 | CREG |
|
Metals: |
||||||
|
Antimony |
0.089J-0.22J | 0.069J-0.546J | 0.27J | 0.05J-0.1J | 0.014 | RfD |
|
Arsenic |
0.002J-0.008 | 0.002J-0.025J | ND | 0.002J-0.032 | 0.011 | RfD |
|
Cadmium |
0.006-0.024 | 0.004J-0.028 | 0.004J | 0.007-0.01 | 0.007 | EMEG |
|
Chromium |
0.014J-0.141 | 0.017J-0.25 | 0.25-0.3J | 0.013J-0.173 | 0.18 | RfD |
|
Lead |
0.003B-0.34J | 0.002B-0.03N | 0.008JB | 0.006JB-0.01JB | 0.05 | EPAMCL |
|
Nickel |
0.021J-0.13J | 0.011J-0.301 | 0.24-0.3J | 0.019J-0.227 | 0.1 | LTHA |
EMEG-ATSDR Environmental Media Evaluation Guide
CREG-ATSDR Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide
RfD-USEPA Reference Dose
LTHA-USEPA Drinking Water Lifetime Health Advisory
EPA MCL-USEPA Maximum Contaminant Level
NJ MCL-New Jersey Maximum Contaminant Level
ppm-parts per million
ND-not detected
J-estimated value
B-found in the associated blank as well as in the sample
JB-estimated value due to blank contamination
*-duplicate out of control limits
N-spike recovery out of control limits
Source: NJDEP Final Report Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, March 1990.
Table 4. Range of Contaminant Levels in Sewer Water Samples
| Contaminant | Range of Levels (ppm) | Comparison Value | |
| ppm | Source | ||
|
|
|||
|
Volatile Organics: |
|||
|
Benzene |
ND | ||
|
Chlorobenzene |
ND | ||
|
Chloroethane |
ND | ||
|
Ethylbenzene |
ND | ||
|
4 Methyl 2 pentanone |
ND | ||
|
Vinyl Acetate |
ND | ||
|
Vinyl Chloride |
ND | ||
| Xylenes | 0.03 | 0.044 | NJ MCL |
|
Semi-Volatile Organics: |
|||
|
Benzo(a)pyrene |
ND | ||
|
BEHP |
0.020-0.036 | 0.0025 | CREG |
|
Di-n-octylphthalate |
ND | ||
|
2-Methylphenol |
ND | ||
| 4-Methylphenol | 0.052-0.096 | none | none |
|
Napthalene |
0.003 | 0.02 | LTHA |
|
Phenanthrene |
ND | ||
|
Phenol |
0.019-1.32 | 21 | RfD |
|
Pesticides: |
|||
|
Aldrin |
ND | ||
| Heptachlor | ND | ||
| Metals: | |||
|
Antimony |
0.044-0.16 | 0.014 | RfD |
| Arsenic | 0.041 | 0.011 | RfD |
|
Cadmium |
0.006-0.13 | 0.007 | EMEG |
|
Chromium |
0.029-0.081 | 0.18 | RfD |
|
Lead |
0.235-1.61 | 0.05 | EPA MCL |
| Nickel | 0.034-0.116 | 0.1 | LTHA |
EMEG-ATSDR Environmental Media Evaluation Guide
CREG-ATSDR Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide
RfD-USEPA Reference Dose
LTHA-USEPA Drinking Water Lifetime Health Advisory
EPA MCL-USEPA Maximum Contaminant Level
NJ MCL-New Jersey Maximum Contaminant Level
ppm-parts per million
ND-not detected
J-estimated value
B-found in the associated blank as well as in the sample
Source: NJDEP Final Report Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, March 1990.
Table 5. Range of Contaminant Levels in Off-site Surface Water Samples
| Contaminant | Range of Levels (ppm) | Comparison Value | |
| ppm | Source | ||
|
|
|||
|
Volatile Organics: |
|||
|
Benzene |
0.003J | 0.0012 | CREG |
| Chlorobenzene | ND | ||
|
Chloroethane |
0.002J | none | none |
| Ethylbenzene | ND | ||
| 4 Methyl 2 pentanone | ND | ||
| Vinyl Acetate | ND | ||
|
Vinyl Chloride |
ND |
||
| Xylenes | ND | ||
| Semi-Volatile Organics: | |||
|
Benzo(a)pyrene |
ND | ||
|
BEHP |
0.1-0.9 | 0.0025 | CREG |
|
Di-n-octylphthalate |
0.056 | none | none |
|
2-Methylphenol |
ND | ||
| 4-Methylphenol | ND | ||
|
Napthalene |
ND | ||
|
Phenanthrene |
ND | ||
| Phenol | ND | ||
| Pesticides: | |||
| Aldrin | ND | ||
| Heptachlor | ND | ||
|
Metals: |
|||
| Antimony | ND | ||
|
Arsenic |
ND | ||
| Cadmium | 0.01-0.086 | 0.007 | EMEG |
| Chromium | 0.01-0.04 | 0.18 | RfD |
| Lead | 0.01J-0.25 | 0.05 | EPA MCL |
| Nickel | 0.02J-0.03J | 0.1 | LTHA |
EMEG-ATSDR Environmental Media Evaluation Guide
CREG-ATSDR Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide
RfD-USEPA Reference Dose
LTHA-USEPA Drinking Water Lifetime Health Advisory
EPA MCL-USEPA Maximum Contaminant Level
NJ MCL-New Jersey Maximum Contaminant Level
ppm-parts per million
ND-not detected
J-estimated value
B-found in the associated blank as well as in the sample
Source: NJDEP Final Report Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, March 1990.
Table 6. Range of Contaminant Levels in Sediment Samples
| Contaminant | Range of Levels (ppm) | Comparison Value | |
|
ppm |
Source | ||
|
|
|||
|
Volatile Organics: |
|||
|
Benzene |
ND | ||
| Chlorobenzene | 0.01 | 14,000 | RfD |
|
Chloroethane |
ND | ||
| Ethylbenzene | ND | ||
|
4 Methyl 2 pentanone |
0.08 | none | none |
|
Vinyl Acetate |
ND | ||
|
Vinyl Chloride |
ND | ||
|
Xylenes |
0.01 | 1,400,000 | RfD |
|
Semi-Volatile Organics: |
|||
|
Benzo(a)pyrene |
ND | ||
|
BEHP |
0.23JB-16 | 50 | CREG |
| Di-n-octylphthalate | ND | ||
| 2-Methylphenol | ND | ||
| 4-Methylphenol | ND | ||
| Napthalene | ND | ||
| Phenanthrene | 0.07-2.1 | none | none |
|
Phenol |
ND | ||
|
Pesticides: |
|||
|
Aldrin |
ND | ||
|
Heptachlor |
ND | ||
|
Metals: |
|||
| Antimony | 71.6N-93.2N | 10 | NJSAL |
|
Arsenic |
3.4-92.7N | 20 | NJSAL |
|
Cadmium |
19.6 | 3 | NJSAL |
| Chromium | 14.2-347JB | 100 | NJSAL |
|
Lead |
13.5N*-762J | 250-1000 | NJSAL |
| Nickel | 15.6-79.9JB | 100 | NJSAL |
CREG-ATSDR Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide
RfD-USEPA Reference Dose
NJSAL-New Jersey Soil Action Level
ppm-parts per million
ND-not detected
J-estimated value
B-found in the associated blank as well as in the sample
JB-estimated value due to blank contamination
*-duplicate out of control limits
N-spike recovery out of control limits
Source: NJDEP Final Report Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, March 1990.
Table 7. Potential Exposure Pathways
|
EXPOSURE PATHWAY ELEMENTS |
TIME | ||||
| Source | Environmental Media |
Point of Exposure |
Route of Exposure |
Exposed Population |
|
| Sayreville Landfill (SL) |
Subsurface Soil |
Wastefill | Skin contact Ingestion Inhalation |
Sayreville and South River Residents, and Nearby Workers |
Past Present Future |
| SL | Surface Water | South River Duck Creek Pond Creek |
Skin Contact Ingestion |
Sayreville and South River Residents |
Past Present Future |
| SL | Sediments | South River Duck Creek Pond Creek |
Skin Contact Ingestion |
Sayreville and South River Residents |
Past Present Future |
| SL | Ambient Air | South River Residences and Businesses, Nearby Businesses |
Inhalation | South River Residents and Workers, and Nearby Workers |
Past Present Future |
The following section was not available in electronic format for conversion to HTML at the time of preparation of this document. To obtain a hard copy of the document, please contact:
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
Division of Health Assessment and Consultation
Attn: Chief, Program Evaluation, Records, and Information Services Branch, E-56
1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30333
RESPONSE SUMMARY
This response summary represents those comments and reactions to the Public Health Assessment received during the public comment period described in the Community Concerns Evaluation section. In some cases, similar commentary was received from various sources, while other concerns were specific to individuals or groups. Comments and concerns have been grouped by content and are followed by the consequent response.
Comment:
Comments were received indicating that the Public Health Assessment had incorrectly listed the Celotex Corporation, or it's subsidiary Insul-Caustic Company, as an owner or operator of the Sayreville Landfill site.
Response:
All references to the Celotex Corporation, or it's subsidiary Insul-Caustic Company, as an owner or operator of the Sayreville Landfill site have been deleted.
The following comments were received from the Borough of Sayreville:
Comment:
The Borough believes that the shallow aquifer near the Sayreville Landfill should not be considered a potential future source of drinking water due to the documented salt water intrusion of the aquifer.
Response:
A reference to salt water intrusion has been made in the Public Health Assessment.
Comment:
The Borough believes that the report of illegal dumping of "hazardous materials" after closure of the landfill is incorrect.
Response:
A change was made to the Public Health Assessment to reflect the unknown nature of the material illegally dumped at the landfill.
Comment:
The Borough believes that the description of the original landfill closure was not accurate since it did not mention the foot of clay that was placed on the side slopes of the landfill.
Response:
A change was made to the Public Health Assessment to make reference to the addition of the foot of clay.






