PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT
CLARKE ROAD MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
WAYNESBORO, BURKE COUNTY, GEORGIA
TABLE 1. MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS DETECTED IN RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE WELL
| Contaminant (ppb) | MCL | MDL | ATSDR CV | PW-R |
| Methylene Chloride | 5 | 2 | 5 (CREG) | 7.5 |
| Dichlorodifluoromethane | - | 2 | 2000 (RMEG) | 9 |
| Trichlorofluoromethane | - | 2 | 3000 (RMEG) | 5 |
| cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | 70 | 2 | 3000 (EMEG) | 3 |
| Tetrachloroethene | 5 | 2 | 0.7 (CREG) | 7 |
| Trichloroethene | 5 | 2 | 3 (CREG) | 3 |
MCL : Maximum Contaminant Level
ATSDR CV: Comparison Value
CREG: Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide for
1x10-6 excess cancer risk
MDL: Method Detection Limit
PW-R: Residential Private Well
RMEG: Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guide
TABLE 2 - COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
| Pathway Name: | Source | Medium | Exposure Point |
Exposure Route | Receptor Population | Time of Exposure | Exposure Activities | Estimated Number Exposed | Chemicals |
| Clark Road MSWL Drinking Water | MSWL or other | GW | Single private well | Ingestion | Residents of home with contaminated water | Past, Present | Ingestion of well water | 4 | methylene chloride, tetrachloroethene |
| * The approximate number of exposed individuals is the estimate of persons who reside in the home that sampling indicates water may have been contaminated. | |||||||||
TABLE 3 - POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
| Pathway Name: | Source | Medium | Exposure Point |
Exposure Route | Receptor Population | Time of Exposure | Exposure Activities | Estimated Number Exposed | Chemicals |
| Clark Road MSWL Drinking Water | MSWL or other | GW | Private wells | Ingestion | Residents of homes with contaminated water | Future | Ingestion of well water | Unknown | methylene chloride, tetrachloroethene |
| * Assuming that all of the residences will be impacted by contaminated groundwater in the future, there would be approximately 21 residents exposed. | |||||||||
TABLE 4. EXPOSURE AND DEMOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE FILE
Total Population Estimates Table
DOCUMENT NAME__Clark Road MSWL Waynesboro, Burke County, Georgia_____
SEGMENT NAME (If applicable)____________________
DOCUMENT DATE_07/01/98_
| Pathway Name | Unknown | Estimated Pop. in Pathway | Range Minimum | Range Maximum |
| a. Pot. Pathways On-site | 0 | |||
| b. Pot. Pathways Off-site |
exact number and source | 21 | 15 | 28 |
| c. Total Pot. On and Off-site | 21 | 15 | 28 | |
| d. Compl. Pathways On-site | 0 | |||
| e. Compl. Pathways Off-site | 4 | 2 | 4 | |
| f. Total Compl. On and Off-site | 4 | 2 | 4 | |
| g. Pot. and Compl. Pathways On-site | 0 | |||
| h. Pot. and Compl. Pathways Off-site | 25 | 17 | 32 | |
| I. Total Pot. and Compl. On and Off-site | 25 | 17 | 32 |
These population estimates were determined by a resident head count among the seven residences along the southern border of the site.
TABLE 5 - CALCULATION OF EXPOSURE DOSE FROM INGESTION OF
CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
| Maximum Contaminant Level | Level in parts per million (ppm) | Estimated Adult Exposure Doses in mg/kg/day* | Estimated Child Exposure Doses in mg/kg/day* | Health Guideline (MRL) in mg/kg/day* | Source of Guideline | Cancer Risk |
| methylene chloride | 0.0075 | 0.000214 | 0.00075 | 0.2 | MRL2 | 4 in 10,000,000 |
| tetrachloroethene | 0.007 | 0.0002 | 0.0007 | 0.05 | MRL | 3 in 1,000,000 |
Appendix A - Calculation of Cancer Risk and MRL
Calculation of Risk of Carcinogenic Effects
Carcinogenic risks from the ingestion of groundwater were calculated using the following procedure. The adult exposure doses for ingestion of groundwater was calculated and multiplied by the EPA's Cancer Slope Factor (CSF) for that chemical (8). This result was then modified because it was assumed that maximum exposure length was 70 years. (Table 5).
The actual risk of cancer is probably lower than the calculated number. The method used to calculate EPA's Cancer Slope Factor assumes that high dose animal data can be used to estimate the risk for low dose exposures in humans (9). The method also assumes that there is no safe level for exposure (10). There is little experimental evidence to confirm or refute those two assumptions. Lastly, the method computes the 95% upper bound for the risk, rather than the average risk, which results in there being a very good chance that the risk is actually lower, perhaps several orders of magnitude (11). One order of magnitude is 10 times greater or lower than the original number, while two orders of magnitude are 100 times, and three orders 1,000 times.
Calculation of MRL (Health Guidelines)
Where sufficient toxicologic information is available, ATSDR has derived minimal risk levels (MRLs) (12) for inhalation and oral routes of entry at each duration of exposure (acute, intermediate, and chronic). An MRL is an estimate of the daily human exposure to a hazardous substance that is likely to be without appreciable risk of adverse noncancer health effects over a specified duration of exposure. MRLs are based on noncancer health effects only and are not based on a consideration of cancer effects. These MRLs are not meant to support regulatory action: but to acquaint health professionals with exposure levels at which adverse health effects are not expected to occur in humans. They should help physicians and public health officials determine the safety of a community living near a chemical emission, given the concentration of a contaminant in air or the estimated daily dose in water. MRLs are based largely on toxicological studies in animals and on reports of human occupational exposure.


