HEALTH CONSULTATION
FRESH KILLS LANDFILL
STATEN ISLAND, RICHMOND COUNTY, NEW YORK

Figure 9. Monthly Variations in Ambient Benzene Concentrations for Selected Monitoring Stations

Figure 10. Emission Ratios for Selected Monitoring Stations

Figure 12. Monthly Variations in Ambient Formaldehyde Concentrations for All Monitoring Stations

Figure 13. Monthly Variations in Ambient Formaldehyde Concentrations for Selected Monitoring Stations

Figure 15. Monthly Arithmetic Means of PM10 Concentrations for Selected Monitoring Stations

Figure 16. Schedule of Ambient Air Monitoring Data Available from NYSDEC

Figure 16. (Continuted) Schedule of Ambient Air Monitoring Data Available from NYSDEC

Figure 16. (Continuted) Schedule of Ambient Air Monitoring Data Available from NYSDEC
Table 1 - Summary Findings for 1994 and 1995 Air Quality Data, Staten Island
| Chemical | Maximum Concentration a Measured in a Residential Area (Location) | ATSDR Comparison Value | Type of CVc |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | 0.55 (District 2 Garage) | 180 | AGC |
| 1,1,2-Trichloroethane | 0.02 (District 2 Garage, Intermediate School 75, Port Richmond, Public School 69) | 0.01 | CREG/AGC |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | 0.6 (Port Richmond) | 0.01 | CREG/AGC |
| 2-Butanone | 5.71 (District 2 Garage) | 100 | AGC |
| Acetaldehyde | 2.98 (Intermediate School 75) | 0.27 | CREG |
| Acetone | 5.227 (District 2 Garage) | 5800 | AGC |
| Acrolein | 0.017 (Port Richmond) | 0.009 | EMEG-i/AGC |
| Benzaldehyde | 0.58 (Intermediate School 75) | NAC | NAC |
| Benzene | 2.58 (District 2 Garage) | 0.03 | CREG |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | 0.16 (Richmond Avenue) | 0.01 | CREG/AGC |
| Chlorobenzene | 0.16 (District 2 Garage) | 4.3 | AGC |
| Chloroform | 0.1 (Arthurkill Road) | 0.008 | CREG |
| Crotonaldehyde | 0.24 (Intermediate School 75) | 4.8 | AGC |
| Ethylbenzene | 2.07 (District 2 Garage) | 226 | AGC |
| Formaldehyde | 12.84 (Intermediate School 75) | 0.05 | AGC |
| Hexanal | 0.217 (Intermediate School 75) | NAC | NAC |
| m,p-Xylene | 3.38 (District 2 Garage) | 40 | EMEG-a |
| m-Dichlorobenzene | 0.33 (District 2 Garage) | NAC | NAC |
| Methacrolein | 0.4 (Intermediate School 75) | NAC | NAC |
| Methylene Chloride | 2.7 (Port Richmond) | 0.85 | CREG |
| n-Butyraldehyde | 0.279 (Port Richmond) | NAC | NAC |
| o-Dichlorobenzene | 0.46 (Public School 69) | 3.3 | AGC |
| o-Xylene | 1.59 (District 2 Garage) | 159 | AGC |
| p-Dichlorobenzene | 0.235 (District 2 Garage) | 114 | AGC |
| Propionaldehyde | 5.47 (Intermediate School 75) | 0.04 | AGC |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 0.523 (Port Richmond) | 0.17 | AGC |
| Toluene | 7.76 (District 2 Garage) | 104 | AGC |
| Trichloroethylene | 0.33 (District 2 Garage) | 0.08 | AGC |
| Valeraldehyde | 0.382 (Intermediate School 75) | 117 | AGC |
| Vinyl Chloride | 0.12 (District 2 Garage) | 0.01 | AGC |
| PM10 | 72 (Arthurkill Road, Public School 26) | 50 | AGC |
| PM10--Arsenic | 0.0119 (Arthurkill Road) | 0.0002 | CREG |
| PM10--Cadmium | <MDL b (Arthurkill Road, Public School 69) | 0.0005 | AGC |
| PM10--Chromium | 0.0363 (Arthurkill Road) | 0.00002 | AGC |
| PM10--Lead | 0.07 (Arthurkill Road, Public School 69) | 0.75 | AGC |
| PM10--Mercury | 0.00015 (Arthurkill Road) | 0.014 | EMEG-c |
| PM10--Nickel | 0.0839 (Arthurkill Road) | 0.002 | CREG/AGC |
| PM10--Vanadium | 0.031 (Arthurkill Road) | 0.2 | EMEG-a/AGC |
| TSP | 394 (District 2 Garage) | NAC | NAC |
| TSP--Arsenic | 0.014 (District 2 Garage) | 0.0002 | CREG |
| TSP--Cadmium | 0.004 (Public School 26) | 0.0005 | AGC |
| TSP--Chromium | 0.0479 (Arthurkill Road) | 0.00002 | AGC |
| TSP--Lead | 0.1 (District 2 Garage) | 0.75 | AGC |
| TSP--Mercury | 0.0004 (Public School 26) | 0.014 | EMEG-c |
| TSP--Nickel | 0.1616 (Intermediate School 75) | 0.002 | CREG/AGC |
| TSP--Vanadium | 0.0542 (Susan Wagner High School) | 0.2 |
b <MDL: In all samples in residential locations, chemical concentrations did not exceed the minimum detection limit (MDL).
Table 2 - Port Richmond (107 total sampling dates)
| Fresh Kills Landfill Air Monitoring Data, 1994-1995 | |||||||
| Chemical | Data Range a | Minimum Detection Limit (MDL) a | Comparison Value (CV) a | Type of CV | Total Number of Samples | Number of Samples with Chemical Detected | Number of Samples above CV |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | <MDL-0.3 | 0.03 | 180 | AGC | 54 | 47 | 0 |
| 1,1,2-Trichloroethane | <MDL-0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | CREG/AGC | 64 | 1 | --- b |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | <MDL-0.6 | 0.01 | 0.01 | CREG/AGC | 50 | 17 | 11 |
| 2-Butanone | 0.154-1.144 | 0.007 | 100 | AGC | 21 | 21 | 0 |
| Acetaldehyde | 0.669-2.838 | 0.018 | 0.27 | CREG | 21 | 21 | 21 |
| Acetone | 0.124-2.726 | 0.01 | 5800 | AGC | 21 | 21 | 0 |
| Acrolein | <MDL-0.017 | 0.007 | 0.009 | EMEG/AGC | 21 | 11 | 4 |
| Benzaldehyde | 0.027-0.123 | 0.004 | None | NA c | 21 | 21 | NA c |
| Benzene | <MDL-2.2 | 0.04 | 0.03 | CREG | 62 | 57 | --- b |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | <MDL-0.08 | 0.02 | 0.01 | CREG/AGC | 54 | 34 | --- b |
| Chlorobenzene | <MDL-0.02 | 0.02 | 4.3 | AGC | 64 | 5 | 0 |
| Chloroform | <MDL-0.09 | 0.02 | 0.008 | CREG | 60 | 20 | --- b |
| Crotonaldehyde | 0.009-0.149 | 0.008 | 4.8 | AGC | 21 | 21 | 0 |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.087-1.29 | 0.02 | 226 | AGC | 57 | 57 | 0 |
| Formaldehyde | 1.706-7.518 | 0.008 | 0.05 | AGC | 21 | 21 | 21 |
| Hexanal | 0.019-0.125 | 0.016 | None | NA c | 21 | 21 | NA c |
| m,p-Xylene | 0.02-2.7 d | 0.04 | 40 | EMEG | 55 | 55 | 0 |
| m-Dichlorobenzene | <MDL-0.17 | 0.03 | None | NA c | 60 | 28 | NA c |
| Methacrolein | <MDL-0.171 | 0.008 | None | NA c | 21 | 18 | NA c |
| Methylene Chloride | <MDL-2.7 | 0.25 | 0.85 | CREG | 56 | 12 | 1 |
| n-Butyraldehyde | 0.041-0.279 | 0.01 | None | NA c | 21 | 21 | NA c |
| o-Dichlorobenzene | <MDL-0.11 | 0.03 | 33 | AGC | 64 | 5 | 0 |
| o-Xylene | 0.03-1.58 | 0.03 | 159 | AGC | 57 | 57 | 0 |
| p-Dichlorobenzene | <MDL-0.04 | 0.04 | 114 | AGC | 60 | 5 | 0 |
| Propionaldehyde | 0.117-2.153 | 0.01 | 0.04 | AGC | 21 | 21 | 21 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | <MDL-0.523 | 0.04 | 0.17 | AGC | 61 | 51 | 16 |
| Toluene | 0.03-6.29 d | 0.04 | 104 | AGC | 59 | 59 | 0 |
| Trichloroethylene | <MDL-0.17 | 0.02 | 0.08 | AGC | 61 | 42 | 7 |
| Valeraldehyde | <MDL-0.163 | 0.01 | 117 | AGC | 21 | 20 | 0 |
| Vinyl Chloride | <MDL-0.04 | 0.08 | 0.01 | AGC | 61 | 3 | --- b |
| PM10 | 9-68 | < 1 | 50 | AGC | 104 | 104 | 6 |
a Concentrations of organics, in plain font, are in units of parts per billion (ppb); concentrations of particulates, in italic font, are in units of micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).
bMinimum detection limit (MDL) is not low enough to detect comparison value (CV) concentrations.
cNot applicable: chemical does not have a comparison value (CV).
d The sampling and analytical approach used in the monitoring study could quantify some chemical concentrations at levels below the minimum detection limit (MDL).
| Fresh Kills Landfill Air Monitoring Data, 1994-1995 | |||||||
| Chemical | Data Range a | Minimum Detection Limit (MDL) a | Comparison Value (CV) a | Type of CV | Total Number of Samples | Number of Samples with Chemical Detected | Number of Samples above CV |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | <MDL-0.55 | 0.03 | 180 | AGC | 53 | 48 | 0 |
| 1,1,2-Trichloroethane | <MDL-0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | CREG/AGC | 65 | 3 | --- b |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | <MDL-0.57 | 0.01 | 0.01 | CREG/AGC | 55 | 24 | 15 |
| 2-Butanone | <MDL-5.71 | 0.007 | 100 | AGC | 9 | 8 | 0 |
| Acetaldehyde | 0.367-1.714 | 0.018 | 0.27 | CREG | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Acetone | 0.036-5.227 | 0.01 | 5800 | AGC | 9 | 9 | 0 |
| Acrolein | <MDL-0.015 | 0.007 | 0.009 | EMEG/AGC | 9 | 2 | 1 |
| Benzaldehyde | 0.023-0.114 | 0.004 | None | NA c | 9 | 9 | NA c |
| Benzene | <MDL-2.58 | 0.04 | 0.03 | CREG | 59 | 53 | --- b |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | <MDL-0.12 | 0.02 | 0.01 | CREG/AGC | 56 | 41 | --- b |
| Chlorobenzene | <MDL-0.16 | 0.02 | 4.3 | AGC | 56 | 34 | 0 |
| Chloroform | <MDL-0.05 | 0.02 | 0.008 | CREG | 63 | 18 | --- b |
| Crotonaldehyde | <MDL-0.116 | 0.008 | 4.8 | AGC | 9 | 7 | 0 |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.01-2.07 d | 0.02 | 226 | AGC | 60 | 60 | 0 |
| Formaldehyde | 0.738-1.987 | 0.008 | 0.05 | AGC | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Hexanal | 0.011-0.052 d | 0.016 | None | NA c | 9 | 9 | NA c |
| m,p-Xylene | 0.07-3.38 | 0.04 | 40 | EMEG | 58 | 58 | 0 |
| m-Dichlorobenzene | <MDL-0.33 | 0.03 | None | NA c | 58 | 31 | NA c |
| Methacrolein | <MDL-0.045 | 0.008 | None | NA c | 9 | 3 | NA c |
| Methylene Chloride | <MDL-1.797 | 0.25 | 0.85 | CREG | 61 | 28 | 3 |
| n-Butyraldehyde | 0.035-0.253 | 0.01 | None | NA c | 9 | 9 | NA c |
| o-Dichlorobenzene | <MDL-0.07 | 0.03 | 33 | AGC | 65 | 8 | 0 |
| o-Xylene | 0.015-1.59 d | 0.03 | 159 | AGC | 59 | 59 | 0 |
| p-Dichlorobenzene | <MDL-0.235 | 0.04 | 114 | AGC | 63 | 7 | 0 |
| Propionaldehyde | 0.117-2.219 | 0.01 | 0.04 | AGC | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | <MDL-0.52 | 0.04 | 0.17 | AGC | 56 | 52 | 19 |
| Toluene | <MDL-7.76 | 0.04 | 104 | AGC | 60 | 59 | 0 |
| Trichloroethylene | <MDL-0.33 | 0.02 | 0.08 | AGC | 61 | 50 | 14 |
| Valeraldehyde | 0.01-0.034 | 0.01 | 117 | AGC | 9 | 9 | 0 |
| Vinyl Chloride | <MDL-0.12 | 0.08 | 0.01 | AGC | 59 | 4 | --- b |
| TSP | 21-394 | < 1 | None | NA c | 99 | 99 | NA c |
| TSP--Arsenic | <MDL-0.014 | 0.0014 | 0.0002 | CREG | 89 | 36 | --- b |
| TSP--Cadmium | <MDL | 0.0028 | 0.0005 | AGC | 89 | 0 | --- b |
| TSP--Chromium | <MDL-0.0445 | 0.0095 | 0.00002 | AGC | 43 | 10 | --- b |
| TSP--Lead | <MDL-0.1 | 0.02 | 0.75 | AGC | 89 | 39 | 0 |
| TSP--Mercury | <MDL-0.0003 | 0.00003 | 0.014 | EMEG | 89 | 64 | 0 |
| TSP--Nickel | <MDL-0.0654 | 0.005 | 0.004 | CREG/AGC | 89 | 81 | --- b |
| TSP--Vanadium | <MDL-0.03 | 0.0047 | 0.2 | EMEG/AGC | 89 | 73 | 0 |
bMinimum detection limit (MDL) is not low enough to detect comparison value (CV) concentrations.
cNot applicable: chemical does not have a comparison value (CV).
d The sampling and analytical approach used in the monitoring study could quantify some chemical concentrations at levels below the minimum detection limit (MDL).
Table 4 - Public School 69 (69 total sampling dates)
| Fresh Kills Landfill Air Monitoring Data, 1994-1995 | |||||||
| Chemical | Data Range a | Minimum Detection Limit (MDL) a | Comparison Value (CV) a | Type of CV | Total Number of Samples | Number of Samples with Chemical Detected | Number of Samples above CV |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | <MDL-0.35 | 0.03 | 180 | AGC | 48 | 42 | 0 |
| 1,1,2-Trichloroethane | <MDL-0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | CREG/AGC | 58 | 7 | --- b |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | <MDL-0.12 | 0.01 | 0.01 | CREG/AGC | 48 | 16 | 10 |
| Benzene | <MDL-1.93 | 0.04 | 0.03 | CREG | 53 | 50 | --- b |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | <MDL-0.125 | 0.02 | 0.01 | CREG/AGC | 50 | 41 | --- b |
| Chlorobenzene | <MDL-0.03 | 0.02 | 4.3 | AGC | 56 | 15 | 0 |
| Chloroform | <MDL-0.05 | 0.02 | 0.008 | CREG | 55 | 16 | --- b |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.03-0.81 | 0.02 | 226 | AGC | 51 | 51 | 0 |
| m,p-Xylene | 0.02-2.01 d | 0.04 | 40 | EMEG | 55 | 55 | 0 |
| m-Dichlorobenzene | <MDL-0.09 | 0.03 | None | NA c | 53 | 23 | NA c |
| Methylene Chloride | <MDL-0.67 | 0.25 | 0.85 | CREG | 53 | 14 | 0 |
| o-Dichlorobenzene | <MDL-0.46 | 0.03 | 33 | AGC | 57 | 8 | 0 |
| o-Xylene | <MDL-0.93 | 0.03 | 159 | AGC | 53 | 52 | 0 |
| p-Dichlorobenzene | <MDL-0.04 | 0.04 | 114 | AGC | 55 | 10 | 0 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | <MDL-0.483 | 0.04 | 0.17 | AGC | 51 | 45 | 10 |
| Toluene | 0.06-5.36 | 0.04 | 104 | AGC | 50 | 50 | 0 |
| Trichloroethylene | <MDL-0.15 | 0.02 | 0.08 | AGC | 57 | 39 | 5 |
| Vinyl Chloride | <MDL-0.04 | 0.08 | 0.01 | AGC | 54 | 7 | --- b |
| PM10 | 6-59 | < 1 | 50 | AGC | 64 | 64 | 4 |
| PM10--Arsenic | <MDL-0.0113 | 0.0018 | 0.0002 | CREG | 63 | 6 | --- b |
| PM10--Cadmium | <MDL | 0.004 | 0.0005 | AGC | 63 | 0 | --- b |
| PM10--Chromium | <MDL-0.0208 | 0.0095 | 0.00002 | AGC | 44 | 2 | --- b |
| PM10--Lead | <MDL-0.07 | 0.02 | 0.75 | AGC | 63 | 11 | 0 |
| PM10--Mercury | <MDL-0.0001 | 0.00003 | 0.014 | EMEG | 63 | 27 | 0 |
| PM10--Nickel | <MDL-0.0551 | 0.006 | 0.004 | CREG/AGC | 63 | 56 | --- b |
| PM10--Vanadium | <MDL-0.0296 | 0.0059 | 0.2 | EMEG/AGC | 63 | 36 | 0 |
| TSP | 17-120 | < 1 | None | NA c | 63 | 63 | 0 |
| TSP--Arsenic | <MDL-0.0036 | 0.0014 | 0.0002 | CREG | 62 | 19 | --- b |
| TSP--Cadmium | <MDL | 0.0028 | 0.0005 | AGC | 62 | 0 | --- b |
| TSP--Chromium | <MDL-0.0132 | 0.0095 | 0.00002 | AGC | 44 | 3 | --- b |
| TSP--Lead | <MDL-0.07 | 0.02 | 0.75 | AGC | 62 | 18 | 0 |
| TSP--Mercury | <MDL-0.0003 | 0.00003 | 0.014 | EMEG | 62 | 39 | 0 |
| TSP--Nickel | <MDL-0.0734 | 0.005 | 0.004 | CREG/AGC | 62 | 57 | --- b |
| TSP--Vanadium | <MDL-0.039 | 0.0047 | 0.2 | EMEG/AGC | 62 | 49 | 0 |
bMinimum detection limit (MDL) is not low enough to detect comparison value (CV) concentrations.
cNot applicable: chemical does not have a comparison value (CV).
d The sampling and analytical approach used in the monitoring study could quantify some chemical concentrations at levels below the minimum detection limit (MDL).
Table 5 - Richmond Avenue (61 total sampling dates)
| Fresh Kills Landfill Air Monitoring Data, 1994-1995 | |||||||
| Chemical | Data Range a | Minimum Detection Limit (MDL) a | Comparison Value (CV) a | Type of CV | Total Number of Samples | Number of Samples with Chemical Detected | Number of Samples above CV |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | <MDL-0.22 | 0.03 | 180 | AGC | 38 | 29 | 0 |
| 1,1,2-Trichloroethane | <MDL-0.015 | 0.03 | 0.01 | CREG/AGC | 48 | 1 | --- b |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | <MDL-0.12 | 0.01 | 0.01 | CREG/AGC | 38 | 11 | 5 |
| Benzene | <MDL-1.19 | 0.04 | 0.03 | CREG | 39 | 36 | --- b |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | <MDL-0.16 | 0.02 | 0.01 | CREG/AGC | 42 | 28 | --- b |
| Chlorobenzene | <MDL-0.02 | 0.02 | 4.3 | AGC | 48 | 10 | 0 |
| Chloroform | <MDL-0.06 | 0.02 | 0.008 | CREG | 45 | 12 | --- b |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.01-0.72 d | 0.02 | 226 | AGC | 42 | 42 | 0 |
| m,p-Xylene | 0.02-1.33 d | 0.04 | 40 | EMEG | 42 | 42 | 0 |
| m-Dichlorobenzene | <MDL-0.07 | 0.03 | None | NA c | 47 | 8 | NA c |
| Methylene Chloride | <MDL-0.39 | 0.25 | 0.85 | CREG | 44 | 7 | 0 |
| o-Dichlorobenzene | <MDL-0.02 | 0.03 | 33 | AGC | 48 | 1 | 0 |
| o-Xylene | <MDL-0.49 | 0.03 | 159 | AGC | 41 | 40 | 0 |
| p-Dichlorobenzene | <MDL-0.04 | 0.04 | 114 | AGC | 48 | 4 | 0 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | <MDL-0.3 | 0.04 | 0.17 | AGC | 41 | 36 | 4 |
| Toluene | <MDL-3.047 | 0.04 | 104 | AGC | 42 | 41 | 0 |
| Trichloroethylene | <MDL-0.245 | 0.02 | 0.08 | AGC | 47 | 28 | 3 |
| Vinyl Chloride | <MDL | 0.08 | 0.01 | AGC | 46 | 0 | --- b |
| TSP | 19-100 | < 1 | None | NA c | 39 | 39 | NA c |
| TSP--Arsenic | <MDL-0.0093 | 0.0014 | 0.0002 | CREG | 38 | 7 | --- b |
| TSP--Cadmium | <MDL | 0.0028 | 0.0005 | AGC | 38 | 0 | --- b |
| TSP--Chromium | <MDL-0.02064 | 0.0095 | 0.00002 | AGC | 38 | 5 | --- b |
| TSP--Lead | <MDL-0.03 | 0.02 | 0.75 | AGC | 38 | 6 | 0 |
| TSP--Mercury | <MDL-0.0001 | 0.00003 | 0.014 | EMEG | 38 | 15 | 0 |
| TSP--Nickel | <MDL-0.0291 | 0.005 | 0.004 | CREG/AGC | 38 | 34 | --- b |
| TSP--Vanadium | <MDL-0.0181 | 0.0047 | 0.2 | EMEG/AGC | 38 | 29 | 0 |
bMinimum detection limit (MDL) is not low enough to detect comparison value (CV) concentrations.
cNot applicable: chemical does not have a comparison value (CV).
d The sampling and analytical approach used in the monitoring study could quantify some chemical concentrations at levels below the minimum detection limit (MDL).


