PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT
CENTRAL WOOD PRESERVING COMPANY
SLAUGHTER, EAST FELICIANA PARISH, LOUISIANA

Figure 1. Demographic Statistics
| Contaminants of Concern | South Property | North Property | Comparison Values | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max. conc. detected (mg/kg)1 | Background | Max. conc. detected (mg/kg) | Background | mg/kg | Source | |
| Inorganics | ||||||
| arsenic | 430 | 14 | 6900 | 14 | 20 | child EMEG3 |
| chromium, total | 610 | 22 | 3500 | 22 | 200 | RMEG4 |
| copper | 360 | 5.3 | 4400 | 5.3 | 20 | [15] |
| PAHs | ||||||
| benzo(a)pyrene | 1.5 | N/A2 | 260 | N/A | 0.1 | CREG |
1mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram
2N/A= Not available
3child EMEG= Environmental Media Evaluation Guide
4RMEG= Reference Dose Media Evaluation
[15]= EPA Region 6 Web site
| Contaminants of Concern | Max. conc. detected (mg/kg)1 | Toxic Equivalency Factor | Products | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Property | North Property | South Property | North Property | ||
| PAHs | |||||
| Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene | 20 | 1.2 | 5 | 100 | 6 |
| Benzo(a)pyrene | 1.5 | 260 | 1 | 1.5 | 260 |
| benzo(a)anthracene | 2.0 | 280 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 28 |
| benzo(b)fluoranthene | 2.4 | 440 | 0.1 | 0.24 | 44 |
| benzo(k)fluoranthene | 2.0 | 400 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 40 |
| indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene | 0.5 | 130 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 13 |
| anthracene | 0.81 | 300 | 0.01 | 0.0081 | 3 |
| benzo(g,h,i)perylene | 0.49 | 3.5 | 0.01 | 0.0049 | 0.035 |
| chrysene | 2.9 | 550 | 0.01 | 0.029 | 5.5 |
| acenaphthene | 1.3 | 240 | 0.001 | 0.0013 | 0.24 |
| fluoranthene | 12 | 860 | 0.001 | 0.012 | 0.86 |
| fluorene | 1.3 | 210 | 0.001 | 0.0013 | 0.21 |
| phenanthrene | 3.9 | 420 | 0.001 | 0.0039 | 0.42 |
| pyrene | 8.1 | 720 | 0.001 | 0.0081 | 0.72 |
| Benzo(a)pyrene TOXIC EQUIVALENT | 102.26 | 401.99 | |||
1mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram
| Contaminants of Concern | Max. conc. detected (mg/kg)1 | Background | Comparison Values (mg/kg) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inorganics | ||||
| arsenic | 126 | 14 | 20 | child EMEG3 |
| chromium | 257 | 22 | 200 | RMEG4 |
| PAHs | ||||
| benzo(a)pyrene | 9.4 | N/A2 | 0.1 | CREG5 |
| benzo(a)anthracene | 9.5 | N/A | 0.56 | LDEQ RECAP6 |
| benzo(b)fluoranthene | 16 | N/A | 0.56 | LDEQ RECAP |
| benzo(k)fluoranthene | 16 | N/A | 5.5 | LDEQ RECAP |
| dibenz(a,h)anthracene | 3 | N/A | 0.33 | LDEQ RECAP |
| indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene | 7.8 | N/A | 0.56 | LDEQ RECAP |
1mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
2N/A= Not available
3child EMEG= Environmental Media Evaluation Guide
4RMEG= Reference Dose Media Evaluation
5CREG= Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide for 1x10-6 excess cancer risk.
6LDEQ RECAP= Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Risk Evaluation/Corrective Action Program
| Contaminants of Concern | Max. Conc. Detected (mg/kg)1 | Toxic Equivalency Factor | Product2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene | 3.0 | 5 | 15 |
| Benzo(a)pyrene | 9.4 | 1 | 9.4 |
| benzo(a)anthracene | 9.5 | 0.1 | 0.95 |
| benzo(b)fluoranthene | 16 | 0.1 | 1.6 |
| benzo(k)fluoranthene | 16 | 0.1 | 1.6 |
| indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene | 7.8 | 0.1 | 0.78 |
| benzo(g,h,i)perylene | 6.0 | 0.01 | 0.06 |
| chrysene | 17 | 0.01 | 0.17 |
| acenaphthene | 0.5 | 0.001 | 0.0005 |
| fluoranthene | 22 | 0.001 | 0.022 |
| phenanthrene | 5.7 | 0.001 | 0.00067 |
| pyrene | 17 | 0.001 | 0.017 |
| Benzo(a)pyrene TOXIC EQUIVALENT | 29.59 |
1mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram
2product- (max. conc. detected)(toxic equ. factor)
| Contaminants of Concern | On-site Creek Soil/Sediment | Off-site Creek Soil/Sediment | Comparison Values | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max. conc. detected (mg/kg)1 | Background | Max. conc. detected (mg/kg) | Background | mg/kg | Source | |
| Inorganics | ||||||
| arsenic | 1,100 | 11 | 590 | 11 | 20 | RMEG3 child |
| chromium, total | 2,500 | 16 | 2,800 | 16 | 200 | RMEG child |
| Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons | ||||||
| Benzo(a)pyrene | 860 | NA | 9.4 | NA | 0.1 | CREG4 |
| acenaphthene | 7,100 | NA | 0.5 | NA | 3,000 | RMEG child |
| fluoranthene | 21,000 | NA | 22 | NA | 2,000 | RMEG child |
| fluorene | 12,000 | NA | 0.69 | NA | 2,000 | RMEG |
| pyrene | 5,300 | NA | 17 | NA | 2,000 | RMEG child |
1mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram
2NA= Not available
3 RMEG= Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guide
4CREG= Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide for 1x10-6 excess cancer risk.
| Contaminants of Concern | Max. conc. detected (mg/kg)1 | Toxic Equivalency Factor | Products | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| On-Site Soil/ Sediments | Off-Site Soil/ Sediments | On-Site Soil/ Sediments | Off-Site Soil/ Sediments | ||
| Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene | ND | 3.0 | 5 | 0 | 15 |
| Benzo(a)pyrene | 860 | 9.4 | 1 | 860 | 9.4 |
| benzo(a)anthracene | 1,200 | 9.5 | 0.1 | 120 | 0.95 |
| benzo(b)fluoranthene | 1,200 | 16 | 0.1 | 120 | 1.6 |
| benzo(k)fluoranthene | 600 | 16 | 0.1 | 60 | 1.6 |
| indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene | 270 | 7.8 | 0.1 | 27 | 0.78 |
| anthracene | 15,000 | 29 | 0.01 | 150 | 0.29 |
| benzo(g,h,i)perylene | 150 | 6.0 | 0.01 | 1.5 | 0.06 |
| chrysene | 5,600 | 17 | 0.01 | 56 | 0.17 |
| acenaphthene | 7,100 | 0.5 | 0.001 | 7.1 | 0.0005 |
| fluoranthene | 21,000 | 22 | 0.001 | 21 | 0.022 |
| fluorene | 12,000 | 0.69 | 0.001 | 12 | 0.00069 |
| phenanthrene | 48,000 | 5.7 | 0.001 | 48 | 0.00067 |
| pyrene | 5,300 | 17 | 0.001 | 5.3 | 0.017 |
| Benzo(a)pyrene TOXIC EQUIVALENT | 1,488 | 29.89 | |||
1mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram
| Contaminant of Concern | On-site Surface Water (µg/L)1 | Off-site Surface Water (µg/L) | Comparison Values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| µg/L | Source | |||
| Arsenic | 220 | 29 | 50 | EPA MCL3 |
| Chromium, total | 110 | 23 | 100 | EPA MCL |
| Manganese | 6,600 | 1,000 | 50 | EPA Secondary MCL |
1 µg/l = micrograms per liter
2 NA - Not available
3 MCL= Maximum Contaminant Level
| Contaminants of Concern | Maximum Concentration Detected (µg/L)1 | Comparison Values | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (µg/L) | Source | ||
| Inorganics: | |||
| aluminum | 409 | 200 | Secondary MCL2 |
| iron | 1,070 | 300 | Secondary MCL |
| sodium | 28,500 | 20,000 | EPA DWEL3 |
| Semi-volatiles: | |||
| bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate | 19.6 | 3 | CREG4 |
1 µg/L - micrograms per liters
2 MCL - secondary Maximum Contaminant
3 DWEL - Drinking Water Equivalent Level
Level for aesthetic qualities of drinking water
4 CREG - Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide
| Pathway Names | Exposure Pathway Elements | Time | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | Environmental Media | Point of Exposure | Route of Exposure | Exposed Population | ||
| Soil (SP) | Site | Soil | On-site* | Ingestion Dermal contact | CWP workers | Past |
| Trespassers | Present Future | |||||
| Soil (NP) | Site | Soil | On-site | Ingestion Dermal contact | CWP Workers | Past |
| Trespassers | Future | |||||
| Sediment | Site | Sediment | On-site | Ingestion Dermal contact | CWP Workers | Past |
| Trespassers | Present Future | |||||
| Air | Site | Soil Sediment | On-site | Inhalation | CWP Workers | Past |
| Residential well | Not site related | Groundwater | Tap water | Ingestion Dermal contact | Residents | Present Past Future |
* On-site= CWP site and adjacent property (all within the fence).
| Pathway Names | Exposure Pathway Elements | Time | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | Environmental Media | Point of Exposure | Route of Exposure | Exposed Population | ||
| Air | CWP Site | Airborne soil particulates | Off-site | Inhalation | Residents Trespassers | Present Future |
| Sediment | CWP Site | Sediment | Off-site unnamed creek bottom and banks | Ingestion Dermal contact | Residents Trespassers | Past Present Future |
APPENDIX C: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SUMMARY AND QUESTIONAIRE
July 2000 Needs Assessment Summary
In July 2000, SEET staff administered a Needs Assessment (NA) to approximately 10 homesadjacent to the CWP site. The heads-of-household were asked about their health problems and aboutthe health conditions of other household members. There were 30 health conditions reported byadults (over 18 years of age). No health problems were reported by 73% of the adult population.Health concerns reported for children were allergies, anemia, and chicken pox. The heads-of-household were also asked about their other environmental health concerns. Seven, both males andfemales, reported having no concerns. The other concern expressed was allergies. Follow-up to thecommunity will be in the form of a mail out of the Executive Summary of the Needs Assessmentto the 10 households.
Executive Summary of Responses to the Needs Assessment/Questionnaire on a Community living near the Central Wood Preserving Superfund Site, Slaughter, LA
CERCLIS NO. LAD 008187940
February 2, 2001
On July 22, 2000, three staff members from the Office of Public Health (OPH), Section ofEnvironmental Epidemiology and Toxicology administered a Needs Assessment (NA) in acommunity adjacent to the Central Wood Preserving (CWP) site in Slaughter, Louisiana (EastFeliciana Parish). The community surveyed borders the east side of the site and consists ofapproximately 10 homes.
The heads-of-household completed a two-page survey and a shorter survey for each householdmember. A total of nine households (30 participants), all African American, completed a surveyadministered by OPH staff on a door-to-door basis. OPH staff interviewed twenty-one (70%)female participants and nine (30%) male participants. The age range of the household members wasfrom 1 to 64 years of age. There were seven female (78%) heads-of-household and two males (22%)heads-of-household. All heads-of-household had either worked or lived in this area from 6 to 64years. The age of the houses ranged from 10 months to more than 60 years.
The heads-of-household were asked about their health problems and about the health conditions ofother household members. There were thirty health conditions reported by adults (over 18 years ofage). Twenty-two heads-of-household (73%) of the adult population reported not having any healthproblems. Other responses include conditions such as allergies, anemia, cancer, chest pains, chickenpox, rheumatism, and sinus. Health concerns reported for children were allergies, anemia, andchicken pox.
Data were analyzed regarding whether or not the head-of-household visited a doctor or hospital andwhether or not they had visited either within the last six months. Five of the heads-of-household hadseen a doctor and four heads-of-household had been to a hospital within the last six months. Theonly hospital cited was Lane Memorial.
The heads-of-household were asked about the unnamed creek near their home that feeds into LittleSandy Creek. Three heads-of-household reported that their children played in this ditch. Accordingto eight of the heads-of-household, flooding is not a problem in the area.
Finally, the heads-of-household were asked about their other environmental health concerns. Seven,both males and females, reported having no concerns. The only concern expressed was allergies. No health needs that OPH can offer assistance with were identified.
| CWP | Central Wood Preserving |
|---|---|
| NP | North Property |
| SP | South Property |
| ATSDR | Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry |
| OPH | Office of Public Health |
| SEET | Section of Environmental Epidemiology and Toxicology |
| EPA | Environmental Protection agency |
| NPL | National Priorities List |
| CV | Comparison Values |
| OSHA | Occupational Health and Safety Administration |
| SI | Site Investigation |
| TRI | Toxic Release Inventory |
| RI/FS | Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study |
| XRF | X-Ray Fluorescence |
| SIR | Standard Incidence Ratio |
| LDEQ | Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. |
| LDEQ RECAP | Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Risk Evaluation/Corrective Action Program |
| LSH | Louisiana State Highway |
| NA | Needs Assessment |
| VOCs | Volatile Organic Compounds |
| SVOCs | Semivolatile organic compounds |
| PAHs | Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon |
| RfD | Reference Dose |
| RDA | Recommended Daily Allowances |
| EMEG | Environmental Media Evaluation Guides |
| MRL | Minimal Risk Level |
| CREG | Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide |
| RMEG | Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guide |
| DWEL | Drinking Water Equivalent Level |
| LOAEL | Lowest Observed Adverse Effects Level |
| MCL | Maximum Contaminant Level |
| SMCL | Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level |
| CPT/ROST | Cone Penetration Testing/Rapid Optical Screening Tool |
| CV | Comparison Values |
| TEFs | Toxic Equivalent Factors |
| bgs | below groundwater surface |
Definitions of Selected Terms
- ATSDR:
- The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. The ATSDR is a federal health agency in Atlanta, Georgia that deals with hazardous substances and waste site issues. ATSDR gives people information about harmful chemicals in their environment and tells people how to protect themselves from coming into contact with chemicals.
- Background Level:
- A typical or average level of a chemical in the environment. Background often refers to naturally occurring or uncontaminated levels.
- Cancer Risk Evaluation Guides (CREGs):
- CREGs are estimated contaminant concentrations that would be expected to cause no more than one excess cancer in a million (10-6) persons exposed over their lifetime. ATSDR's CREGs are calculated from U.S. EPA's cancer potency factors (CPFs).
- Comparison Values:
- Estimated contaminant concentrations in specific media that are not likely to cause adverse health effects, given a standard daily ingestion rate and standard body weight. The comparison values are calculated from the scientific literature available on exposure and health effects.
- Concentration:
- The amount of one substance dissolved or contained in a given amount of another. For example, sea water contains a higher concentration of salt than fresh water.
- Contaminant:
- Any substance or material that enters a system (the environment, human body, food, etc.) where it is not normally found.
- Dermal:
- Referring to the skin. Dermal absorption means absorption through the skin.
- Dose:
- The amount of a substance to which a person is exposed. Dose often takes body weight into account.
- DWEL:
- Drinking Water Equivalent Level. Protective level of exposure related to potentially non-carcinogenic effects of chemicals that are also known to cause cancer.
- Environmental Contamination:
- The presence of hazardous substances in the environment. From the public health perspective, environmental contamination is addressed when it potentially affects the health and quality of life of people living and working near the contamination.
- Environmental Media Evaluation Guides (EMEGs):
- EMEGs are based on ATSDR minimal risk levels (MRLs) that consider body weight and ingestionrates. An EMEG is an estimate of daily human exposure to a chemical (in mg/kg/day) that is likelyto be without noncarcinogenic health effects over a specified duration of exposure to include acute, intermediate, and chronic exposures.
- EPA:
- U.S. Environment Protection Agency. The federal agency that develops and enforces environmental laws to protect the environment and the public's health.
- Exposure:
- Contact with a chemical by swallowing, by breathing, or by direct contact (such as through the skin or eyes). Exposure may be short term (acute) or long term (chronic).
- Ingestion:
- Swallowing (such as eating or drinking). Chemicals can get in or on food, drink, utensils, cigarettes, or hands where they can be ingested. After ingestion, chemicals can be absorbed into the blood and distributed throughout the body.
- Inhalation:
- Breathing. Exposure may occur from inhaling contaminants because they can be deposited in the lungs and absorbed into the blood.
- LDEQ:
- Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality
- LDHH:
- Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals
- Media:
- Soil, water, air, plants, animals, or any other parts of the environment that can contain contaminants.
- Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL):
- The MCL is the drinking water standard established by U.S. EPA. It is the maximum permissiblelevel of a contaminant in water that is delivered to the free-flowing outlet. MCLs are consideredprotective of public health over a lifetime (70 years) for individuals consuming 2 liters of water per day.
- mg/L:
- Milligrams per liter (a measure of concentration in water, 1 mg/L is equal to 1 part-per-million.
- µg/L:
- Micrograms per kilogram (a measure of concentration in water, 1 µg/L is equal to 1 part-per-billion and 0.001 mg/L).
- mg/kg:
- Milligrams per kilogram (a measure of concentration in soil or tissue, 1 mg/kg is equal to 1 part per million and 1000 µg/kg).
- µg/kg:
- Micrograms per kilogram (a measure of concentration in soil or tissue, 1 µg/kg is equal to 1 per part billion and to 0.001 mg/kg).
- Minimal Risk Level (MRL):
- An MRL is defined as an estimate of daily human exposure to a substance that is likely to be withoutan appreciable risk of adverse effects (noncancer) over a specified duration of exposure. MRLs arederived when reliable and sufficient data exist to identify the target organ(s) of effect or the mostsensitive health effect(s) for a specific duration via a given route of exposure. MRLs are based onnoncancer health effects only. MRLs can be derived for acute, intermediate, and chronic duration exposures by the inhalation and oral routes.
- No Apparent Public Health Hazard:
- This public health conclusion category is used for sites where human exposure to contaminated media may be occurring, may have occurred in the past, and/or may occur in the future, but the exposure is not expected to cause any adverse health effects.
- National Priorities List (NPL):
- The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA) listing of sites that have undergonepreliminary assessment and site inspection to determine which locations pose immediate threat to persons living or working near the release. These sites are most in need of cleanup.
- OPH:
- Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, Office of Public Health
- Parts per billion (ppb)/ Parts per million (ppm):
- Units commonly used to express low concentrations of contaminants. As example of each, one partper billion (ppb) of trichloroethylene (TCE) equals one drop of TCE mixed in a competition-sizeswimming pool and one part per million (ppm) equals one ounce of trichloroethylene (TCE) in one million ounces of water.
- Potentially Exposed:
- The condition where valid information, usually analytical environmental data, indicates the presenceof contaminant(s) of a public health concern in one or more environmental media contacting humans(i.e., air, drinking water, soil, food chain, surface water), and there is evidence that some of thosepersons have an identified route(s) of exposure (i.e., drinking contaminated water, breathingcontaminated air, having contact with contaminated soil, or eating contaminated food).
- PRP:
- Potentially Responsible Party. A company, government or person that is responsible for causing thepollution at a hazardous waste site. PRP's are expected to help pay for the clean up of a site.
- Public Health Assessment:
- The evaluation of data and information on the release of hazardous substances into the environmentin order to assess any current or future impact on public health, develop health advisories or otherrecommendations, and identify studies or actions needed to evaluate and mitigate or prevent human health effects; also, the document resulting from that evaluation.
- Public Health Hazard:
- This public health conclusion category is used for sites that pose a public health hazard due to theexistence of long-term exposures to hazardous substances or conditions that could result in adverse health effects.
- Reference Dose Media Evaluation Guides (RMEGs):
- ATSDR derives RMEGs from U.S. EPA's oral reference doses. The RMEG represents theconcentration in water or soil at which daily human exposure is unlikely to result in adverse noncarcinogenic effects.
- Risk:
- In risk assessment, the probability that something will cause injury, combined with the potential severity of that injury.
- Route of Exposure:
- The way in which a person may contact a chemical substance. For example, drinking (ingestion)and bathing (skin contact) are two different routes of exposure to contaminants that may be found in water.
- SEET:
- Section of Environmental Epidemiology and Toxicology
- SMCL:
- Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level. Maximum level of a contaminant in water delivered tothe free flowing outlet of the ultimate user, or of contamination resulting from corrosion of piping and plumbing caused by water quality.
- Superfund:
- Another name for the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), which created ATSDR.
- Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs):
- Substances containing carbon and different proportions of other elements such as hydrogen, oxygen, fluorine, chlorine, bromine, sulfur, or nitrogen; these substances easily become vapors or gases. A significant number of the VOCs are commonly used as solvents (paint thinners, lacquer thinners, degreasers, and dry cleaning fluids).
This Central Wood Preserving Company Public Health Assessment was prepared by the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals/Office of Public Health under a cooperative agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). It is in accordance with approved methodology and procedures existing at the time the public health assessment was begun.
Alan W. Yarbrough
Technical Project Officer, SPS, SSAB, DHAC, ATSDR
The Division of Health Assessment and Consultation, ATSDR, has reviewed this public health assessment and concurs with the findings.
Richard Gillig
for Chief, State Program Section, SSAB, DHAC, ATSDR


