PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT
Bloomington PCB Sites
Bloomington, Monroe County, Indiana
and
Spencer, Owen County, Indiana
WINSTON-THOMAS FACILITY (Monroe County)
A. Site Description and History
The Winston-Thomas facility is an inactive sewage treatment plant owned by the City ofBloomington, Indiana, and located on the southwest side of the City of Bloomington (see Figure1). The facility operated from 1933 until 1982. In November of 1975, Westinghouse advised theCity of Bloomington that they had been discharging PCBs into the city sewer system. PCBs werethen sampled for and confirmed at high concentrations in sewage, Tertiary Lagoon clay andsludge, and in the trickling filter at the plant.
The facility was made part of a comprehensive cleanup as defined in the Consent Decree. Thissite was not on the NPL at the time of the Consent Decree settlement in 1983, nor is it currentlyon the NPL. (IDEM. General Overview of Consent Decree Sites. July 1992.)
Interim Measures
The Winston-Thomas facility was shut down in 1982 and a new sewage treatment plant wasopened at the Dillman Road site southwest of Bloomington.
In July 1986, the Bloomington Cities Utilities Board approved temporary storage of wastes oncity property at the Winston-Thomas site. After this approval and receipt of all necessary permitsneeded for construction, Westinghouse constructed the Interim Storage Facility prior tocommencement of remediation at the other sites as outlined in the Consent Decree.
In May of 1987, the first excavated materials from Anderson Road Landfill were taken to thefacility for storage. Excavated materials also began arriving from the stream sites designated forcleanup. A total of 205, 55-gallon drums filled with capacitors and capacitor parts fromAnderson Road Landfill and Lemon Lane Landfill were taken to the site and properly stored. Atotal of 391 cubic yards of stream sediment are stored at the facility along with a total of 706loads of excavated materials from Anderson Road Landfill weighing 4,847 tons. The Conard'sBranch excavation project, which ended in October 1988, generated a total of 1,877 tons ofexcavated bank material and 2,748 tons of stream bed sediment, all of which is being stored at thefacility. In September 1990, APTUS, a wholly owned subsidiary of Westinghouse, drummedPCB-contaminated trash from other containers, labeled all 377 drums stored at the InterimStorage Facility, and transported them to Coffeyville, Kansas for incineration. This materialconsisted of protective clothing, rags, filters, etc. that had accumulated during routinemaintenance and inspections of the Consent Decree sites. In December 1990, APTUS removed605 capacitors being stored on the site for incineration in Coffeyville.
In November 1990, Westinghouse notified the Consent Decree parties that water hadaccumulated over the years in three digester tanks on-site and was close to overflowing. With theapproval of all the Consent Decree parties, Westinghouse decontaminated 410,000 gallons ofwater from the three digesters. Hydrogeological investigations were also begun on-site in Augustof 1987.
PCB Sampling of Indicator Sediment Areas of Clear Creek
In June 1988, the IDEM oversaw the PCB sampling by Westinghouse of two sediment areasalong Clear Creek as required by the Consent Decree.
Current Status
Westinghouse conducts monthly inspections of the Interim Storage Facility and submits inspectionreports to the EPA, IDEM, and the City of Bloomington.
The City of Bloomington utilities has contracted for the removal of muskrats at the Winston-Thomas Tertiary Lagoon because of the concern they may undermine the dike and allow PCB-contaminated water to escape. Some of the muskrats that are removed will be submitted to theU.S. Fish & Wildlife Service for PCB tissue analysis.
The City of Bloomington has contracted with an environmental firm to assess the degree, if any,of microbial degradation of the PCB-contaminated sewage sludge.
On January 28, 1993, Ms. Dollis Wright and Mr. Garry Mills of the ISDH, and staff from IDEMand Westinghouse visited the Consent Decree sites. Observances made during the site visit to theWinston-Thomas facility are listed below.
- Access to the site is restricted by a locked chain-link fence.
- Ducks were seen swimming on the Tertiary Lagoon.
- Inside the on-site Interim Storage Facility (an aluminum, steel support building) a plastic liner had been placed on top of the contaminated soil. A concrete floor and liner prevents contamination from excavated soil from entering the soil under the storage facility.
- There was a protective clothing and decontamination area in the Interim Storage Facility which included two above-ground storage tanks that are used for cleaning equipment.
- The Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant is located in a mixed business/residential area.
C. Demographics, Land Use, Natural Resource Use, and Environmental Setting
Demographics
The Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant site area has high schools within a ½- to 1½-mileradius of the site. The population in the site area is predominantly white. Approximately 500people live within a 1-mile radius of the site.
Land Use and Natural Resource Use
The site is surrounded by residential areas to the west and south, and by commercialdevelopments to the north and east. A residential area lies west of the site beyond Clear Creekand the Illinois Central Railroad tracks. The municipal water supply serves the area in the vicinityof the site. The current status of residential well use in the area is unknown.
Environmental Setting
The site is located in the north to south trending valley of Clear Creek on a nearly level tomoderately sloping plateau. Steep slopes are located along the berm edges of the TertiaryLagoon. Clear Creek was at one time where the Tertiary Lagoon is presently located. Before theTertiary Lagoon was made, Clear Creek was re-routed to the western edge of the site flowingsouth.
There are two layers of bedrock under the soil layer. Grey limestone and shale ranging in depthsfrom 22-36 feet thick, make up the first layer. The second layer is made up of a water-holding,dark gray, silty shale with pyrite specks.
Groundwater flow is interpreted to flow generally to the southwest toward Clear Creek, whichappears to be the discharge point. In the northern portion of the site, the groundwater flowdirection trends more west-southwest, and in the central and southern areas of the site, it trendssouth-southwest.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND OTHER HAZARDS
Ambient Air
As part of Section 7.4 of the Westinghouse Project Safety Plan, April 1987, air monitoring forVOCs, and other chemicals that might be detected, is conducted on a quarterly basis for theInterim Storage Facility at the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant site.
Monitoring results for VOCs and PCBs conducted by Westinghouse from April 1988 throughFebruary 1993 have shown the samples to be below detectable limits. (Westinghouse. Quarterlyinactive status air sample results for the Interim Storage Facility, 1988-1992.)
Abandoned Lagoon Borings
Between March and April 1984, on-site boring samples were collected by EPA at two abandonedlagoons at the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant site (see Figure 25). The formerlagoons are located south of the Tertiary Lagoon near the sludge drying beds. Samples werecollected at ten locations (B-1 - B-10) and analyzed for total PCBs. Sample depths ranged from 0inches to 9 feet 4 inches (B-6). PCBs in the abandoned lagoon boring samples (Table 41) had aconcentration range of less than 1 to 700 ppm (B-4). (Westinghouse. Phase I Progress Report onWinston-Thomas Facility and Bennett's Dump. January 1987.)
| Boring Number | Sample Depth Feet (') Inches (") | PCB Concentration Range (Dry Weight) (ppm) | Comparison Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ppm | Source | |||
| 1 | 4"-5" 2'4"-2'6" 2'11"-3' | 150 120 <1 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 2 | 6"-8" 2'11"-3' 3'3"-3'4" | <1 <1 <1 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 3 | 0"-6" 9"-10" 6'6"-6'7" 6'7"-6'8" 6'8"-6'9" | 82 190 <1 <1 <1 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 4 | 11"-1'7" 4'-4'1" 4'11"-5' | 700 270 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 5 | 4"-5" 2'9"-2'10" 4'3"-4'4" | 36 150 <1 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 6 | 7"-8" 5'8"-5'9" 8'1"-8'2" 8'2"-8'3" 8'3"-9'4" | 160 290 <1 5 3 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 7 | 1'-1'6" 4'6"-5' | 19 <1 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 8 | 2'11"-3' 5'9"-5'10" | 120 <1 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 9 | 11"-1'2" 4'4"-4'5" 7'3"-7'4" 7'4"-7'5" 7'5"-7'6" | 6 <1 <1 <1 <1 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 10 | 1'-1'1" 2'6"-3'2" 4'7"-4'8" | 20 140 3 | 0.01 | EMEG |
Tertiary Lagoon Borings
In May 1984, Tertiary Lagoon boring samples were collected by EPA for PCB analysis from sixlocations (B-11 - B-16) at the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant site (see Figure 25). The Tertiary Lagoon is 17 acres in size and maintains a water depth of 18 inches. The sampledepth involving a clay surface was 0-3 inches. Sample results ranged from 2 ppm in sample B-16to 660 ppm in sample B-14. (Westinghouse. Phase I Progress Report on Winston-ThomasFacility and Bennett's Dump. January 1987.)
Tertiary Lagoon Sludge
In July 1982, sludge samples were collected by the City of Bloomington and analyzed for PCBs (see Figure 26). A total of 11 sample points (#1-11) were involved with an average depthin excess of 55 inches. Liquid and sludge were identified at approximately 55 feet. For sludgeonly, the average depth was in excess of 23 inches. PCBs were detected at all 11 sample points(Table 42). (Grodner & Fore Atty. Letter regarding Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment PlantLagoon Samples. November 10, 1982.)
| Sample Point Number | PCB Concentration (ppm) | Comparison Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ppm | Source | ||
| 1 | 718 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 2 | 275 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 3 | 119 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 4 | 1,750 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 5 | 993 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 6 | 527 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 7 | 1,990 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 8 | 2,400 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 9 | 2,000 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 10 | 1,137 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| 11 | 148 | 0.01 | EMEG |
Tertiary Lagoon Core Sludge
In the early 1980s, tertiary core sludge samples were collected at the site and analyzed for PCBs(see Figure 27). The second set of data were collected by a private contractor (sampling dateunknown) for the City of Bloomington, and were documented by City of Bloomingtoncorrespondence dated February 1983.
A total of ten sample locations (B-top, middle, bottom, D, E, G, J, L, M, O), plus one duplicate(B-middle), were analyzed in this data set. Samples taken from the top to the bottom of the coresection were analyzed. PCBs were detected at all ten locations for Tertiary Lagoon sludge. Results from this set of data are presented in Table 43. (Grodner & Fore Atty. Letter to O'Brien& Gere Engineers Inc. regarding Winston-Thomas Treatment Plant core sludge sample results.February 3, 1983.)
| Sample Location | Core Section | Mid 1980s Sampling PCB Concentration (ppm) | Comparison Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ppm | Source | |||
| B | Top | 150 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| B | Middle | 1,000 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| B | Bottom | 3,100 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| D | Entire | 1,450 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| E | Entire | 2,400 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| G | Entire | 1,170 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| J | Entire | 1,200 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| L | Entire | 530 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| M | Entire | 3,700 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| O | Entire | 2,600 | 0.01 | EMEG |
Tertiary Lagoon Core Sludge and Clay
In June 1983, EPA correspondence documented that previous core sludge and clay samples hadbeen collected and analyzed for total PCBs (see Figure 28). A total of eight core locations, plusone duplicate, were sampled. The average length of the sludge and clay in cores was in excess of21 inches each. Samples taken from the top to the bottom of the core section were analyzed. PCBs were detected at all eight core sludge locations, while PCBs in the core clay were detectedat three locations (E,G,M). PCB analyses results for lagoon core sludge and clay are shown inTable 44. (O'Brien & Gere. Letter to Blasland regarding Winston-Thomas Tertiary Lagoonsludge and clay core sample results. June 23, 1983.)
| Core Location | Core Section | PCB Concentration (ppm) | Comparison Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ppm | Source | |||
| B | Top Middle Bottom | 220 1,400 4,400 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| D | Entire | 770 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| E | Entire | (sludge) 2,000 (clay) 15 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| G | Entire | (sludge) 600 (clay) 9 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| J | Entire | 1,000 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| L | Entire | 241 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| M | Entire | (sludge) 2,500 (clay) 3 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| O | Entire | 1,400 | 0.01 | EMEG |
Groundwater - Monitoring Wells
Ten bedrock monitoring wells were installed in September and October 1987 around theperimeter of the Winston-Thomas facility (see Figure 29). One monitoring well, MW-3S, wasinstalled in the unconsolidated material in July 1987. The monitoring wells were designated asMW-1, -2, -3S, -3I, -3D, -4, -5I, -5D, -6, -7, and -8 (S = shallow, I = intermediate, & D = deep). Eight wells are located hydraulically downgradient, while three wells are located upgradient. Four rounds of groundwater sampling for PCBs were performed by Westinghouse beginning inMarch 1988 and were completed in December 1988. Monitoring well depths ranged from inexcess of 40 feet to in excess of 55 feet.
With respect to these sampling events, PCBs were not detected in the groundwater samplesobtained from wells MW-1, -2, -3D, -4, -5I, -6, and -8. PCBs were detected in two of the fourrepresentative groundwater samples obtained from wells MW-3I and -5D; in all three samplesobtained from well MW-7 (and in the duplicate sample from well MW-7); and in all four samplesobtained from well MW-3S. PCB sample results are shown in Table 45. (Westinghouse.Quarterly Groundwater Sampling Results, Bennett's Dump and Winston-Thomas FacilitySupplemental Hydrogeologic Investigation, December 5-7, 1988. January 1989.)
| Location | PCB Concentration Range (ppb) | Comparison Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ppb | Source | ||
| MW-3S | 2-7 | 0.05 | CREG |
| MW-3I | 0.4-1 | 0.05 | CREG |
| MW-5D | 0.3 | 0.05 | CREG |
| MW-7 | 1-2 | 0.05 | CREG |
- Concentrations listed as one number indicate only a single sample at that location.
In 1992, the Fish and Wildlife Service implemented a waterfowl PCB uptake study using 72yearling mallard hens. Five were processed as controls immediately, and the remaining 67 weremarked and released. Five ducks were collected every ten days until none remained.
Liver tissues were analyzed for cytochrome P-450 induction and composite duck samples weretaken for congener specific PCBs. The PCB uptake rate was remarkable. A concentration of 2ppm was seen in the ducks after only 2 to 10 days of foraging at this site.
Up to several hundred waterfowl at a time can be observed for up to several months during falland early winter migrations.
Groundwater - Residential Wells
In November 1986, the Indiana University School of Public and Environmental Affairs inBloomington conducted a well user survey of approximately 30 residential wells within 5,000 feetof the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant site. Samples were collected at faucets nearestto the well head for drinking water and were analyzed for PCBs. Documentation for the well usersurvey did not include a location map of the residences sampled. Samples detected for PCBs hada concentration range of non-detect to 98 ppt. (Indiana University. Collection and Analysis ofDrinking Water Well Samples for PCB Content. November 1986.)
Surface Water
Between March 1976, September 1977, and June/July 1980, off-site surface water samples werecollected (see Figure 30) by the ISDH and analyzed for total PCBs at ten sample locations: ClearCreek (CC-1 & -3), Salt Creek (SC-2,-3,-5), Pleasant Run (PR-1), and East Fork of the WhiteRiver (EW-3,-4,-5,-6) (Indiana State Department of Health. Memorandum from C. Bridges to O.Hert regarding PCB levels in water sediment and fish from Clear Creek, Salt Creek, Pleasant Run,and the East Fork of White River (Monroe and Lawrence Counties, Indiana) in 1980. February23, 1981.)
All sample results are reported as total PCBs whether or not the samples collected detected oneor more PCB types. Total PCBs detected in the off-site surface water samples had aconcentration range of non-detect to 0.9 ppb (CC-1).
Sediment
Between March 1976, September 1977, and June/July 1980, off-site sediment samples werecollected (see Figure 30) by the ISDH and analyzed for total PCBs at ten sample locations: ClearCreek (CC-1 & -3), Salt Creek (SC-2,-3,-5), Pleasant Run (PR-1), and East Fork of the WhiteRiver (EW-3,-4,-5,-6). PCB analyses results are shown in Table 46. The Consent Decreerequires Westinghouse to sample from these areas. (ISBH. Memorandum to O. Hert regardingPCB levels in water sediment and fish. February 23, 1981.)
All sample results are reported as total PCBs whether or not the samples collected detected oneor more PCB types. Total PCBs detected in the off-site sediment samples had a concentrationrange of non-detect to 1,300 ppm (PR-1).
Between June and July 1988, sediment samples were collected from two indicator areas for PCBsalong Clear Creek, near Gordon Pike and the town of Harrodsburg. Sampling was overseen byIDEM. These samples were taken after hydrovacuuming of Clear Creek had been performed byWestinghouse.
The first indicator area was designated within 300 feet downstream of Gordon Pike. Tensampling locations were selected; no PCBs were detected.
The second indicator area for PCB sampling along Clear Creek is approximately 12 miles south ofthe first indicator area, Gordon Pike. This area was designated as within 200 feet upstream ofOld State Road 37 near Harrodsburg, Indiana. Ten sampling locations were selected. Except forone detection of 12 ppm, all other samples were non-detect.
As part of the sediment sampling conducted at the Lemon Lane Landfill by IDEM in November1991 (RK6320-RK6324), sediment samples were also collected off-site near the Winston-ThomasSewage Treatment Plant site (IDEM. Memorandum. February 25, 1992). These samples were only analyzed for PCBs.
| Station or Sample Number | Location | Sample Date | Water Samples | Sediment Samples | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration Range (ppb) | Comparison Value | Concentration Range (dry weight) (ppm) | Comparison Value | |||||
| ppb | Source | ppm | Source | |||||
| CC-1 | Clear Creek north of Harrodsburg | 3/11/76 6/19/80 | ND-0.9 <0.1-0.2 | 0.05 | EMEG | ND <200-2,200 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| CC-3 | Clear Creek 1 mile up from mouth Clear Creek 100 yds. up from mouth | 9/27/77 7/1/80 | ND-0.2 ND-0.3 | 0.05 | EMEG | <100-<100 ND-540 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| SC-2 | Salt Creek just below Monroe Dam | 3/11/76 7/1/80 | ND-<0.1 ND-<0.1 | 0.05 | EMEG | ND ND-150 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| SC-3 | Salt Creek below Clear Creek near Logan | 3/11/76 9/27/77 7/1/80 | ND-0.1 ND-0.2 ND-<0.1 | 0.05 | EMEG | ND 100-1,600 ND-2,200 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| PR-1 | Pleasant Run at Peerless Road | 9/27/77 6/19/80 | 0.4-12 0.1-9 | 0.05 | EMEG | ND-1,300,000 <200-315,000 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| SC-5 | Salt Creek, 0.25 mile above mouth | 9/28/77 7/2/80 | ND-0.6 ND-<0.1 | 0.05 | EMEG | <100-1,500 ND-2,100 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| EW-3 | E. Fork White River just above Salt Creek | 6/17/80 | <0.1-0.1 | 0.05 | EMEG | <200-<250 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| EW-4 | E. Fork White River just below Salt Creek | 9/28/77 6/18/80 | ND-<0.1 <0.1-0.2 | 0.05 | EMEG | 150-610 410-1,100 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| EW-5 | E. Fork White River above Williams Dam | 6/18/80 | <0.1-<0.1 | 0.05 | EMEG | <200-<250 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| EW-6 | E. Fork White River below Williams Dam | 9/28/77 6/18/80 | ND-<0.1 <0.1-<0.1 | 0.05 | EMEG | <100-120 <200-<250 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| RK6320 | Clear Creek at Gordon Pike Bridge | 11/91 | - | - | - | 0.19 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| RK6321 | Clear Creek at drain tile under Winston-Thomas | 11/91 | - | - | - | 0.13 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| RK6322 | Swampy area northwest of Winston-Thomas lagoon | 11/91 | - | - | - | BDL | 0.01 | EMEG |
| RK6323 | Clear Creek north of Winston-Thomas | 11/91 | - | - | - | 0.19 | 0.01 | EMEG |
| RK6324 | Clear Creek north of Country Club Road | 11/91 | - | - | - | 0.50 | 0.01 | EMEG |
ND = non-detect
Concentrations listed as one number indicate only a single sample at that location.
Fish
Between March 1976, September 1977 and 1979, and June/July 1980, fish samples were collected(see Figure 30) by the ISDH and analyzed for total PCBs at ten sample locations: Clear Creek(CC-1 & -3), Salt Creek (SL-2,-3,-5), Pleasant Run (PR-1), and East Fork of the White River(EW-3,-4,-5,-6). (ISBH. Memorandum to Water and Sewage Laboratory. February 1981.)
All sample results in Table 47 are reported as total PCBs whether or not the samples collecteddetected one or more PCB types. Total PCBs detected in the fish data (whole fish basis) had aconcentration range of non-detect to 85 ppm (CC-3).
| Station | Date | Type of Fish | PCB Concentration (Whole Fish Basis) (ppm) | Comparison Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ppm | Source | ||||
| CC-1 | 1976 1980 1980 1980 1980 | Creek Chub Creek Chub Bluegill Sunfish Longear Sunfish Largemouth Bass | 66 20 1 25 5 | 2 | FDA |
| CC-3 | 1976 1977 1980 | Yellow Bass Bluegill Sunfish Longear Sunfish Longear Sunfish Largemouth Bass Northern Pike Largemouth Bass Bluegill Sunfish Longear Sunfish | 20 12 85 ND ND ND ND 20 16 | 2 | FDA |
| SC-2 | 1976 1980 | Bluegill Sunfish Longear Sunfish Striped Bass (Morone sp.) Bluegill Sunfish Longear Sunfish | 9 1 0.1 4 8 | 2 | FDA |
| SC-3 | 1976 1977 1980 | Largemouth Bass Longear Sunfish Longear Sunfish Spotted Bass Largemouth Bass Largemouth Bass Longear Sunfish Longear Sunfish | 7 10 ND ND ND 7 11 9 | 2 | FDA |
| SC-5 | 1976 1977 1980 | Largemouth Bass Largemouth Bass Longear Sunfish Largemouth Bass Largemouth Bass Longear Sunfish | 28 ND ND ND ND ND | 2 | FDA |
| EW-3 | 1976 1980 | Spotted Bass Channel Catfish Bluegill Sunfish Longear Sunfish Spotted Bass Channel Catfish Flathead Catfish Sunfishes (Lepomis spp.) | 12 5 10 13 ND ND ND ND | 2 | FDA |
| EW-4 | 1976 1977 1980 | Longear Sunfish Flathead Catfish Bluegill Sunfish White Crappie White Crappie Longear Sunfish Channel Catfish Channel Catfish Channel Catfish | 10 3 ND ND ND 19 ND ND ND | 2 | FDA |
| EW-5 | 1976 1979 | Spotted Bass Bluegill Sunfish Longear Sunfish Longear Sunfish Largemouth Bass Longear Sunfish Longear Sunfish Channel Catfish | 2 2 13 ND ND ND ND ND | 2 | FDA |
| EW-6 | 1976 1977 1980 | Largemouth Bass Longear Sunfish Largemouth Bass Longear Sunfish Bluegill Sunfish Longear Sunfish Bluegill Sunfish Largemouth Bass | 3 8 ND ND ND ND ND ND | 2 | FDA |
C. Quality Assurance and Quality Control
For the first groundwater sampling event (March 1988), the PCB analytical data are invalid forwells MW-1, -2, -4, -6, -7, and -8. The data are invalid because the pump utilized for samplingcontained residual PCBs from sampling well MW-5 at the Bennett Stone Quarry site. A PCBconcentration of 6 ppb was detected in the methods blank QA sample obtained from the pump. The PCB analytical data for the last three quarterly sampling events (June, September, andDecember 1988) are valid for the aforementioned wells, except for well MW-6 in the June 1988sampling event. PCBs were apparently still present in this well from the March 1988 samplingevent. The PCB analytical data are valid for wells MW-3S, -3I, -3D, -5I, and -5D for all fourquarterly events.
This site is surrounded by a chain-link fence. In the unlikely event that a trespasser were to gainaccess to the site, there is a potential for accidental drowning due to the number of areas withstanding water. Per the site visit on January 28, 1993, there were no other apparent physicalhazards present on this site.
A. Completed Exposure Pathways
Off-site Fish
Fish sampling of Clear Creek indicates that they are contaminated with PCBs. PCBs bind tightlyto sediment particles. Due to the lipophilic nature of PCBs, they readily bio-concentrate. It isassumed that fish in Clear Creek bioaccumulated PCBs through contaminated water and ingestionof contaminated sediments. A level 2 fish advisory has been issued by the ISDH on Clear Creeksince 1988 to the present.
A level 2 fish advisory means that women of child bearing age and children under the age of 18should not consume any of the fish listed in the advisory for the named waterway. All otherindividuals should limit their consumption of those designated fish species to no more than onemeal per week.
Eating fish taken from Clear Creek is a past, present, and future exposure pathway for humanexposure to PCBs.
Off-site Sewage Sludge
Sludge was used by various individuals in the Bloomington area for gardening. From 1972through 1976, approximately 500 to 1,000 persons had obtained sludge at the Westinghouse plantfor organic gardening. It is important to note that studies of PCB uptake in plants indicate thatPCBs may be taken up by the root system of plants. It is possible, however, that contamination ofplants may be due to wind-blown dust versus the root uptake system (Sommers. 1976). Ingestionof vegetables from gardens which had PCB-contaminated sludge is a past, present, and futurecompleted exposure pathway (Baker et al. 1980).
On- and Off-site Wild Game
Even though the Tertiary Lagoon is fenced, wildlife such as ducks and muskrats have beenobserved on the site. During the daily activities of these animals, sludge in the lagoon could quitenaturally be disturbed. It is likely that the ducks and muskrats in the Tertiary Lagoon havemigrated and accumulated PCBs from contaminated sludge in their bodies. Excretion of PCBs isslow, so accumulation occurs even at low exposure levels. Further, the higher the chlorination,the longer it takes to be excreted by the body. Human ingestion of these wild game is a past,present, and future pathway for PCBs to enter the body.
| PATHWAY NAME | EXPOSURE PATHWAY ELEMENTS | TIME | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOURCE | ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA | POINT OF EXPOSURE | ROUTE OF EXPOSURE | EXPOSED POPULATION | NUMBER OF EXPOSED PERSONS | ||
| Off-site Fish | Winston- Thomas Site | Fish | Clear Creek | Ingestion | Individuals eating fish from Clear Creek | 200-230 | Past Present Future |
| Off-site Sewage Sludge | Winston- Thomas Site | Sludge | Gardens | Ingestion Dermal Contact | Individuals eating home- grown produce, Gardeners | 500-1,000 | Past Present Future |
| On- & Off-site Wild Game | Winston- Thomas Site | Ducks Muskrats | Tertiary Lagoon | Ingestion | Individuals eating wild game that roamed the Winston-Thomas site | 65-70 | Past Present Future |
B. Potential Exposure Pathways
On- and Off-site Ambient Air
PCBs in air can be present as both airborne solid and liquid particles, and vapor that eventuallyreturn to the land as water, snow, rain, and the settling of dust particles. During its operation, theWinston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant had two sludge lagoons, three areas of sludge dryingbeds, and the Tertiary Lagoon. PCBs were found in these areas at up to 2,500 ppm. These sixareas presented the potential for contamination of ambient air.
Monitoring results for VOCs and PCBs from April 1988 through February 1993 have all beennon-detect. As the site is no longer operating, the sludge lagoons, sludge drying beds, andtertiary lagoons present a past potential inhalation exposure pathway.
Off-site ambient air is a past, present, and future inhalation exposure pathway for individuals whoused sewage sludge for their gardens. It is possible that both airborne, solid, and liquid particles,and vapors from the sewage sludge contaminated the ambient air around these gardens.
Off-Site Sediment
Interim remediation involved the removal of 1,100 feet of sediment from Clear Creek. Before thisremoval, sediment was contaminated with unknown levels of PCBs. The sediment route of entryto the human body would be through incidental or accidental ingestion of stream water and/orabsorption of the chemicals through the skin.
PCBs are bound to soil particles reducing the amount of human skin and stomach absorptionconsiderably. Swimmers, especially young children, could swallow water containing thesesediments. The amount of sediment ingested during swimming and wading is expected to beminimal. Sediment is a past potential exposure route for individuals participating in recreationalactivities at Clear Creek prior to the interim remediation.
The June 1988 sampling of Clear Creek revealed sediment samples contaminated with PCBs at 12ppm. Because groundwater under the site discharges primarily into Clear Creek, and PCBsbioaccumulate rapidly, sediment is considered a future potential pathway for PCBs to reach thesurrounding community during recreational activities by incidental ingestion and dermal contact. The IDEM performed the last sampling of Clear Creek in November 1991; PCBs were detected0.19 ppm.
Off-site Surface Water
The sewage treatment plant was functional from 1933 to 1982. Clear Creek was at one timewhere the Tertiary Lagoon is presently located. Before the Tertiary Lagoon was made, ClearCreek was re-routed to the western edge of the site flowing south. Although interim remedialremoval of sediments from Clear Creek were done by 1987, the last sampling data for Clear Creekshowed PCBs at 0.19 ppm. Surface water presents a past, present, and future potential exposurepathway for individuals participating in recreational activities in Clear Creek through incidentalingestion of sediments and dermal contact.
Off-site Groundwater - Private Wells
The Indiana University School of Public and Environmental Affairs performed a well user surveyin 1986 for the Winston-Thomas site. Forty private wells were located within a 5,000-foot radiusof the site. Results showed all samples taken from the private wells to be non-detect to 98 ppt forPCB. Although the area is currently served by municipal water, it is unknown how many privatewells are still being used for potable water.
Groundwater under the site flows generally to the south, southwest toward Clear Creek. There isa potential for private wells to be contaminated with PCBs emanating from the site. The privatewells south and southwest of the site are the most likely to potentially be contaminated. The useof the private wells in the vicinity of the Winston-Thomas site is a past, present, and futurepotential exposure pathway for individuals using them for potable water.
Off-site Cattle
Some of the individuals that obtained sludge for organic gardening also used sludge in pastureswhere cattle grazed. Accumulation of PCBs in the tissues of these cattle is possible. Cattle thatgrazed on sludge covered fields are a past potential exposure pathway to individuals who ate thismeat.
| PATHWAY NAME | EXPOSURE PATHWAY ELEMENTS | TIME | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOURCE | ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA | POINT OF EXPOSURE | ROUTE OF EXPOSURE | EXPOSED POPULATION | NUMBER OF EXPOSED PERSONS | ||
| On-site/Off-site Ambient Air | Winston- Thomas Site | Air | Area Around Winston- Thomas Site | Inhalation | Individuals around Winston- Thomas site & those who used sewage sludge in their gardens | 250 | Past Present Future |
| Off-site SurfaceWater/Sediment | Winston-Thomas Site | Water/Sediment | Clear Creek | Ingestion Dermal Contact | Recreational Users of Clear Creek | Unknown | Past Present Future |
| Off-site Groundwater | Winston- Thomas Site | Groundwater | Private Wells | Ingestion, Inhalation, Dermal Contact | Residents who use private wells (5,000 ft radius) | 120 | Past Present Future |
| Off-site Cattle | Winston- Thomas Site | Meat | Pastures with sewage sludge | Ingestion | Individuals eating meat from cattle that grazed on pastures with PCB- contaminated sludge | Unknown | Past |


