Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to site content




The TDH has prepared this public health assessment under a Cooperative Agreement with the ATSDR. TDH has included the following information in accordance with ATSDR's Child Health Initiative.

ATSDR's Child Health Initiative recognizes that the unique vulnerabilities of infants and children demand special emphasis in communities faced with contamination of their water, soil, air, or food. Children are at greater risk than adults from certain kinds of exposures to hazardous substances emitted from waste sites and emergency events. They are more likely to be exposed because they play outdoors and often bring food into contaminated areas. They are shorter than adults, which means they breathe dust, soil, and heavy vapors close to the ground. Children are also smaller, resulting in higher doses of chemical exposure per body weight. The developing body systems of children can sustain permanent damage if toxic exposures occur during critical growth stages. Most importantly, children depend completely on adults for risk identification and management decisions, housing decision, and access to medical care.

TDH evaluated the likelihood for children living in the vicinity of the Holly Street Power Plant to be exposed to site contaminants at levels of health concern. In the past, noise levels in the surrounding neighborhood at times reached levels deemed unacceptable. During peak plant operations, noise levels at a nearby elementary school could have reached levels of distraction. Noise abatement measures implemented by the City of Austin EUD have reduced noise levels in the neighborhood and inside the school. Because site access is restricted, children are not likely to be exposed to contaminants on the site.


  1. The information reviewed does not indicate that people are currently being exposed to levels of contamination that would be expected to cause adverse health effects. From analysis of available information, we have concluded that the Holly Street Power Plant poses no apparent public health hazard.

  2. Modeling data suggest that mixed fuel burning with fuel oil containing 0.227% to 0.3 % sulfur by weight could result in sulfur dioxide levels high enough to aggravate pre-existing respiratory conditions (i.e., asthma) in sensitive individuals; however, the voluntary use of low sulfur containing fuel (0.05% by weight) should ensure that SO2 levels remain below levels of health concern. Currently, it is unlikely that air pollution from the plant would pose a health threat.

  3. The evidence for an association between EMF exposure and adverse health outcomes is currently inconclusive because of numerous inconsistencies and contradictory findings. Since the Holly Street Power Plant is not the source of EMFs, removing the plant would have little or no effect on the EMF readings in the neighborhood. Replacing the existing power lines with new lines designed to minimize field strength would have an effect on EMF levels, but there is inadequate evidence to determine whether minimizing the field strength would result in lower risks for adverse health effects.

  4. In the past, noise levels around the Holly Street Power Plant were above the levels normally defined as acceptable and could have been considered a nuisance by nearby residents. The abatement efforts undertaken by the City of Austin (in 1994 and 1996) have resulted in a significant reduction in the noise levels experienced by the community. Except for a small area immediately adjacent to the facility, noise levels in the community have been reduced to acceptable levels. Sensitive individuals who live within this area at times could find the noise annoying.

    Health effects from exposure to noise are well established for adults, but less well established for children. Some evidence suggests that elevated noise levels potentially could interfere with cognitive development in children. Abatement efforts have reduced the noise levels at Metz elementary school and available information suggests that noise levels in the classrooms should be below those associated with affecting cognitive development.

  5. We reviewed groundwater reports of groundwater monitoring data collected from on-site monitoring wells. Benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene all were reported below their respective minimum detection limits (MDLs). The levels of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) found in groundwater was very low and infrequent; therefore, we have concluded that TPH in the groundwater does not represent a public health hazard. Since human exposure to groundwater is unlikely, groundwater was eliminated as a possible exposure pathway.

  6. PCBs have been released on the site; however, except for one event where plant personnel detected PCBs in water discharged from the plant, all other detections above events were confined to the site. Subsequent testing of water and sediment from Town Lake by an independent consulting firm has shown no detectable levels of PCBs. We were not able to find any evidence that people have come into contact with PCBs from the Holly Street Power Plant. Without contact, adverse health effects could not occur. We eliminated exposure to PCBs as a possible threat to public health.

  7. All phases of this assessment involve a degree of uncertainty. While the process deals with scientifically verifiable findings, judgement is also used. The degree of uncertainty in this process depends upon the completeness of site data, assumptions that simplify and approximate site conditions and exposures, completeness of toxicity data for the contaminants of concern, and professional judgement used in developing and evaluating various parameters. To the extent possible, the assumptions used in this assessment weigh heavily towards the protection of public health.


Cease/Reduce Exposure

  1. The City of Austin EUD should continue to use low sulfur (0.05%) fuel oil during periods when the burning of fuel oil is necessary.

  2. Although published information on EMFs is not adequate for addressing public health concerns, the city can take steps to reduce EMF exposure as opportunities arise. The City has taken steps in this direction by moving the Holly Street power lines to the Town Lake shore and placing the lines on higher poles. If the City plans to replace other existing power lines, it should consider designing the new lines to minimize EMF exposure.

  3. Depending upon the current experience of local residents, the City of Austin EUD should investigate if additional measures could be taken to further reduce the impact of noise generated by the facility on the residents living closest to the facility.

Site Characterization

  1. The City of Austin EUD has taken additional measurements inside one of the portable classrooms at Metz Elementary school with the plant operating at a 496 MW power output. The measurements taken inside averaged 40.7 dB, which is below EPA's indoor guideline.

Other Public Health Actions

To address concerns relating to potentially catastrophic events, the following actions have been or will be taken:

  1. The EUD will continue with plans to upgrade the fire protection/suppression systems at the plant beginning with a review of a preliminary engineering design that was previously completed by a consulting firm.

  2. The EUD has improved the redundancy of the power supply to the Holly 3 and 4 control systems and will install additional backups and equipment upgrades prior to the start of Holly 4.

  3. In response to the June 14, 1999, incident, the EUD has initiated a root cause investigation to identify factors that contributed to the incident so that recommendations can be made for the improvement of plant safety and reliability.

  4. The EUD has met with the Austin Fire Department (AFD) to review emergency response issues and will initiate further contact with the AFD to develop more formal emergency response procedures.

Additional Recommendations

In conjunction with the risk reduction measures taken or planned by the EUD, it also would be useful for the city to establish a Utility Management/Community Interaction Plan. This plan could be used to open the lines of communication between the community and the EUD and might include:

  1. developing a forum where community members have an opportunity to periodically voice their concerns and provide input into the way proposed and implemented technical changes at the plant affect the community,

  2. providing a designated liaison to the community who would provide open and direct contact between the utility and the citizens, and

  3. designing a mechanism where the community's risk perceptions are weighed and possibly addressed in future plant process changes or other hazard control measures.


John F. Villanacci, Ph.D.
Environmental Epidemiology and Toxicology Division

Kathryn A. Evans, M.P.H.
Health Risk Assessment and Toxicology Program

Richard Beauchamp, M.D.
Medical Toxicologist
Bureau of Epidemiology

Dixie Davis
Administrative Technician
Environmental Epidemiology and Toxicology Division

ATSDR Regional Representative

George Pettigrew
Senior Regional Representative
ATSDR - Region 6

ATSDR Technical Project Officer

Alan W. Yarbrough
Environmental Health Scientist
Division of Health Assessment and Consultation
Superfund Site Assessment Branch


  1. Austin, City of. Memorandum from Mark Minatelli, Electric Utility Department to Judy Henry, Texas Department of Health regarding Holly Street Power Plant monitoring well data. December 14, 1993.

  2. Austin, City of. Letter from Richard A. Scadden to Laurie Wagner of Texas Department of Health regarding Holly Street Power Plant monitoring well data. February 25, 1994.

  3. Radian, 1993. Screening study of noise impacts from the Holly Street Power Plant.

  4. Schachter EN, Witek TJ, Beck GJ, et al. 1984. Airway effects of low concentrations of sulfur dioxide: dose-response characteristics. Arch Environ Health 39:34-42.

  5. Amdur MO, Melvin WW, Drinker P 1953. Effects of inhalation of sulphur dioxide by man. The Lancet 2:758-759.

  6. Islam MS, Neuhann HF, Grzegowski E, et al. 1992. Bronchomotoric effect of low concentration of sulfur dioxide in young healthy volunteers. Fresenius Envir Bull 1:541-546.

  7. Sheppard D, Wong WS, Uehara CF, et al. 1980. Lower threshold and greater bronchomotor responsiveness of asthmatic subjects to sulfur dioxide. Am Rev Respir Dis 122:873-878.

  8. Bethel RA, Sheppard D, Geffroy B, et al. 1985. Effects of 0.25 ppm sulfur dioxide on airway resistance in freely breathing, heavily exercising, asthmatic subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 131:659-661.

  9. Linn WS, Shamoo DA, Spier CE, et al. 1983. Respiratory effects of 0.75 ppm sulfur dioxide in exercising asthmatics: Influence of upper respiratory defenses. Environ Res 30:340-348.

  10. Linn WS, Avol EL, Shamoo DA, et al. 1984. Asthmatics' responses to 6-hr sulfur dioxide exposures on two successive days. Arch Environ Health 39:313-319.

  11. Roger LJ, Kehrl HR, Hazucha M, et al. 1985. Bronchoconstriction in asthmatics exposed to sulfur dioxide during repeated exercise. J Appl Physiol 59:784-791.

  12. Sheppard D, Saisho A, Nadel JA, et al. 1981. Exercise increases sulfur dioxide-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 123:486-491.

  13. Bethel RA, Sheppard D, Epstein J et al. 1984. Interaction of sulfur dioxide and dry cold air in causing bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects. J Appl Physiol: Respir Environ Exercise Physiol 57:419-423.

  14. Koenig JQ, Morgan MS, Horike M et al. 1985. The effects of sulfur oxides on nasal and lung function in adolescents with extrinsic asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 76:813-818.

  15. Koenig JQ, Covert DS, Hanley QS, Van Belle G, Pierson WE. 1990. Prior esposure to ozone potentiates subsequent response to sulfur dioxide in adolescent asthmatic subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis. 141:377-380.

  16. HSDB. 1998. Hazardous Substance Data Base, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  17. Pope CA III, Dockery DW, 1992 May. Acute health effects of PM10 pollution on symptomatic and asymptomatic children. Am Rev Respir Dis. 145(5):1123-1128.

  18. Chestnut LG, Schwartz J, Savitz DA, Burchfiel CM 1991. Pulmonary function and ambient particulate matter: Epidemiological evidence from NHANES I. Arch Environ Hlth. 46:135-144.

  19. Hoek G 1993. Acute effects of a winter air pollution episode on pulmonary function and respiratory symptoms of children. Arch Environ Hlth. 48:328-335.

  20. Ware JH, Ferris BG, Dockery DW, Spengler JD, Stram DO, and Speizer FE 1986. Effects of ambient sulfur oxides and suspended particles on respiratory health of preadolescent children. Am Rev Respir Dis. 133:834-842.

  21. Ostro B 1993. The association of air pollution and mortality: Examining the case for inference. Arch Environ Hlth. 48:336-342.

  22. Abbey DE, Petersen F, Mills PK, Beeson WL 1993. Long-term ambient concentrations of total suspended particulates, ozone, and sulfur dioxide and respiratory symptoms in a nonsmoking population. Arch Environ Hlth. 48:33-46.

  23. Ponka A 1991. Asthma and low level air pollution in Helsinki. Arch Environ Hlth. 46:262-270.

  24. Pope CA 1991. Respiratory hospital admissions associated with PM10 pollution in Utah, Salt Lake, and Cache Valleys. Arch Environ Hlth. 46:90-97.

  25. Pope CA 1989. Respiratory disease associated with community air pollution and a steel mill, Utah Valley. Am J Public Health. 79:623-628.

  26. Sunyer J, Saenz M, Murillo C, Castellsague J, Martinez F, and Anto JM 1993. Air pollution and emergency room admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A 5-year study. Am J Epidemiol. 137:701-705.

  27. Martin AE, and Bradley WH 1960. Mortality, fog and atmospheric pollution - investigation during the winter of 1958-59. Mon Bull Minist Health Public Health Lab Serv 19:56-72.

  28. Schwartz J, and Marcus A 1990. Mortality and air pollution in London: A time series analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 131:185-194.

  29. Schwartz J, Dockery DW 1992. Increased mortality in Philadelphia associated with daily air pollution concentrations. Am Rev Respir Dis. 145:600-4.

  30. Schwartz J 1993. Air pollution and daily mortality in Birmingham, Alabama. Am J Epidemiol. 137:1136-1147.

  31. Dockery DW, Pope A, et al, 1993. An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. Cities. N Eng J Med. 329:1753-1759.

  32. Schwartz J, and Dockery DW 1992. Particulate air pollution and daily mortality in Steubenville, Ohio. Am J Epidemiol. 135:12-25.

  33. Plagiannakos T, Parker J. An assessment of air pollution effects on human health in Ontario. Ontario Hydro, March; 1988.

  34. Fairley D. The relationship of daily mortality to suspended particulates in Santa Clara County, 1980-1986. Environ Health Perspect 1990; 89:159-68.

  35. Shumway RH, Azari AS, Pawitan Y. Modeling mortality fluctuations in Los Angeles as functions of pollution and weather effects. Environ Res 1988; 45:224-41.

  36. Ozkaynak H, Thurston GD 1987. Associations between 1980 U.S. mortality rates and alternative measures of airborne particle concentration. Risk Analysis. 7:449-61

  37. Lipfert FW, Malone RG, Daum ML, et al. A statistical study of macroepidemiology of air pollution and total mortality, Brookhaven National Laboratory, conducted for the Department of Energy, April; 1988.

  38. Blackman CF, Elder JA, Weil CM, Benane SG, Eichinger DC, House DE 1979: Induction of calcium ion efflux from brain tissue by radiofrequency radiation: effects of modulation frequency and field strength. Radio Sci 14 (6s); 93-98.

  39. Blackman CF, Benane SG, House DE, Jones WT 1985. Effects of ELF (1-120 H ) and modulated (50 H ) fields on the efflux of calcium ions from brain tissue in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics 6:1-11.

  40. Blackman CF, Benane SG, Elliot DJ, House DE, Pollock MM 1988; Influence of electromagnetic fields on the efflux of calcium ions from brain tissue in vitro: a three-model analysis consistent with the frequency response up to 510 Hz. Bioelectromagnetics 9:215-227.

  41. Blank M, Blank JN 1986. Concentration changes at ion channels due to oscillating electric fields. J Electro Chem Soc; 133:23

  42. Barnes FS, Hu CL 1977. Model for some non-thermal effects of radio and microwave fields on biological membranes. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Technol 25:742.

  43. Findl E 1987. Membrane transduction of low energy level fields and the Ca++ hypothesis. In: Blank M, Findl E, eds. Mechanistic approaches to interactions of electric and electromagnetic fields with living systems. New York: Plenum Press.

  44. Bartsch C, Bartsch H, Fluechter S, et al. 1985. Evidence for modulation of melatonin secretion in men with benign and malignant tumors of the prostate. J Pineal Res; 21:121-132.

  45. Bassett CAL 1987. Low energy pulsing electromagnetic fields modify biomedical processes. Bioessays; 6:36-42.

  46. Cohen M, Lippman M, Chabner B 1978. Role of pineal gland in aetiology and treatment of breast cancer. Lancet; 2:814-816.

  47. Tamarkin L, Cohen M, Roselle D, Reichert C, Lippman M, Chabner B 1981. Melatonin inhibition and pinealectomy enhancement of 7.12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary tumors in the rat. Cancer Res; 41:4432-4436.

  48. Welker HA, Semm P, Willig RP, Commenty JC, Wiltschko W, Volbrath L 1983. Effects of an artificial magnetic field on serotonin N-acetyltransferase activity and melatonin content of the rat pineal gland. Exp Brain Res; 50:426-432.

  49. Wilson BW, Anderson LE, Hilton DI, Phillips RD 1981. Chronic exposure to 60-Hz electric fields: effects on pineal function in the rat. Bioelectromagnetics; 2:371-380.

  50. Wilson BW, Chess EK, Anderson LE 1986. 60-Hz electric-field effects on pineal melatonin rhythms: time course for onset and recovery. Bioelectromagnetics; 7:239-242.

  51. Wilson BW, Lueng F, Buschbom R, Stevens RG, Anderson LE, Reither RJ 1988. Electric fields, the pineal gland and cancer. In: Gupta D. Attanasio A. Reiter RJ, eds. The pineal gland, and cancer. Tubingen, Germany: Brain Research Promotion; 245-259.

  52. Liburdy RP, Sloma TR, Sokolic R, and Yaswen P. 1993 ELF magnetic fields, breast cancer, and melatonin: 60 Hz fields block melatonin's oncostatic action on ER+breast cancer cell proliferation. J. Pineal Res 14(2):89-97.

  53. Stevens RG. Biologically based epidemiological studies of electric power and cancer. Environ Hlth Persp. 101 Supp 4:93-100.

  54. Wertheimer N, and Leeper E 1979. Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 109:273-84.

  55. Wertheimer N, and Leeper E 1982. Adult cancer related to electrical wires near the home. Int J Epidemil. 11:345-55.

  56. Tomenius L 1986. 50-Hz electromagnetic environment and the incidence of childhood tumors in Stockholm County. Bioelectromagnetics. 7:191-207.

  57. Savitz DA, Wachtel H, Barnes FA, John EM, and Tvrdik JG 1988. Case-control study of childhood cancer and exposure to 60-Hz magnetic fields. Am J Epidemiol. 128:21-38.

  58. Savitz DA, John EM, and Kleckner RC 1990. Magnetic field exposures from electric appliances and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 131:763-73.

  59. Feychting M, and Ahlbom A 1993. Magnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Swedish high-voltage power lines. Am J Epidemiol. 138:467-81.

  60. Fulton JP, Cobb S, Preble L, Leone L, and Forman E 1980. Electrical wiring configurations and childhood leukemia in Rhode Island. Am J Epidemiol. 111 :292-306.

  61. Myers A, Cartwright RA, Bonnell JA, Mole CK, and Cartwright SC 1985. Overhead power lines and childhood cancer. Paper presented at the International Conference on Electric and Magnetic Fields in Medicine and Biology, London, 1985. (Abstract).

  62. McLaughlin JK, Malker HSR, Blot WJ, Malker BK, Stone BJ, Weiner JA, Ericsson JLE, and Fraumeni JF Jr 1987. Occupational risks for intracranial gliomas in Sweden. J Nat Cancer Inst. 78:253-307.

  63. Preston-Martin S, Peters JM, Yu MC, Garabrant DH, and Bowman JD 1988. Myelogenous leukemia and electric blanket use. Bioelectromagnetics. 9:207-13.

  64. Severson RK, Stevens RG, Kaune WT, Thomas DB, Heuser L, Davis S, and Sever LE 1988. Acute nonlymphocytic leukemia and residential exposure to power frequency magnetic fields. Am J Epidemiol. 128:10-20.

  65. Krieger GR, Irms R. Nonionizing Electromagnetic Radiation. In: Hazardous Materials Toxicology: Clinical Principles of Environmental Health. Edited by J.B. Sullivan, Jr. and G.R. Krieger. Williams & Wilkins, 1992.

  66. Savitz DA, and Fiengold L 1989. Association of childhood cancer with residential traffic density. Scan J. Work Environ Health. 15:360-3.

  67. London SJ, Thomas DC, Bowman JD, Sobel E, Cheng TC, and Peters JM 1991. Exposure to residential electric and magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukemia. Am J Epidemiol. 134:923-37.

  68. STEPP 1995. State of Texas Environmental Priorities Project, Human Health Workgroup Draft Summary report.

  69. NIEHS 1999. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Report on Health Effects From Exposure To Power-Line Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields. National Institute of Health (NIH) publication No. 99-4493.

  70. McCunney RJ 1992. Occupational Exposure to Noise. In: Environmental and Occupational Medicine 2nd edition. Edited by William N. Rom. Little, Brown and Company.

  71. Burton DJ 1994. Noise's temporary, long-term effects on hearing loss must be quantified. Occup. Health & Safety. Feb.: 36-43.

  72. Mills JH 1975. Noise and children: A review of literature. J Acoust Soc Am. 58:767-79.

  73. Schulte W, Heusch G, Eiff AW, 1977. The influence of experimental traffic noise on autonomous function of normotensives and hypertensives after stress. Basic Res Cardiol. 72:575-80.

  74. Andren L, Lindstedt G, Bjorkman M, Borg KO, Hansson L 1982. Effect of noise on blood pressure and "stress" hormones. Clin Sci. 62:137-41.

  75. Mosskov JI, and Ettema JH 1977. Extraauditory effects in short-term exposure to aircraft and traffic noise. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 40:165-73.

  76. Zhou Y, Zhang S, Selvin S, Spear R 1991. A dose response relation for noise induced hypertension. Brit J of Ind Med. 48:179-84.

  77. Wang TJ, Zhang BZ, Chao ZD et al. 1981. Investigation of the effects of weaving noise on hearing loss and non-auditory damage in retired female weavers. Shanghai Med. 4:34-7.

  78. Geber WF 1966. Developmental effects of chronic maternal audiovisual stress on the rat fetus. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 16:1-16.

  79. Geber WF 1970. Cardiovascular and teratogenic effects of chronic intermittent noise stress. In: Welch BL, Welch AS, eds. Physiological Effects of Noise, pp. 85-90. New York: Plenum.

  80. Niemtzow RC 1993. Loud noise and pregnancy. Military Med. 158, 1:10-12.

  81. Hartikainen-Sorri AL, Sorri M, Anttonen H, Tuimala R 1988. Occupational noise exposure during pregnancy: A case-control study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 60:279-283.

  82. Dejoy DM 1983. Environmental noise and children: Review of recent findings. J of Aud Res. 23:181-94.

  83. Cohen S, Evans GW, Krantz DS, Stokols D, Kelly S 1981. Aircraft noise and children: longitudinal and cross-sectional evidence on adaptation to noise and the effectiveness of noise abatement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 40:330-45.

  84. Greene KB, Pasternack BS, Shore RE 1982. Effects of aircraft noise on reading ability of school-age children. Arch. Environm. Health. 37:24-31.

  85. Lukas JS, Dupree RB, Swing JW 1981. Effects of noise on academic achievement and classroom behavior. Calif. Dept. Transportation, Rpt. No. FHWA/CA/DOHS-81/01.

  86. Radian 1996. Comparison of sound levels in the vicinity of the Holly Street Power Plant before and after sound abatement improvements.


  1. Bauchinger M, Hauf R, Schnid E, Dresp J 1981. Analysis of structural chromosome changes and SCE after occupational long-term exposure to electric and magnetic fields from 380 KV-systems. Radiat Environ Biophys; 19:235-238.

  2. Baum JW, Nauman CH 1984. Influence of strong magnetic fields on genetic endpoints in Tradescantia tetrads and stamen hairs. Environ Mutagen; 6:49-58.

  3. Chiabbrera A, Nicolini C, Schwan HP eds. 1985. Interactions between electromagnetic fields and cells. New York: Penum Press.7-238.

  4. Dejoy DM 1984. The nonauditory effects of noise: Review and perspectives for research. J of Aud Res. 24:123-50.

  5. Frazier ME, Samuel JE, Kaune WT 1987. Viabilities and mutation frequencies of CHO-KI cells following exposure to 60-Hz electric fields. In: Anderson LE, Kelman BJ, Weigle RJ, eds. Interactions of biological systems with static and ELF electric and magnetic fields: proceedings of the 23rd Hanford Life Sciences Symposium; October 2-4, 1984 Richland WA; Pacific Northwest Laboratory; 255-267.

  6. Goodman EM, Greenebaum B, Marron MT, Carrick K 1984. Effects of intermittent electromagnetic fields on mitosis and respiration. J Bio Electricity; 3:57-66.

  7. Goodman R, Abbott I, Henderson AS 1987. Transcriptional patterns in the x chromosome of Sciara coprophila following exposure to magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics; 8:1-7.

  8. Goodman R, Bassett CAL, Henderson AS 1983. Pulsing electromagnetic fields include cellular transcription. Science; 220:1283-1285.

  9. Goodman R, Henderson AS 1986. Sine waves enhance cellular transcription. Bioelectromagnetics; 7:23-29.

  10. Goodman R, Henderson AS 1988. Exposure of salivary gland cells to low-frequency electromagnetic fields alters polypeptide synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85; 3928-3932.

  11. Krieger GR 1992. Nonionizing Electromagnetic Radiation. In: Hazardous Materials Toxicology, Clinical Principles of Environmental Health. Edited by John B. Sullivan and Gary R. Krieger. Williams & Wilkins.

  12. Koenig JQ, Marshall SG, Horike M et al. 1987. The effects of albuterol on sulfur dioxide induced bronchoconstriction in allergic adolescents. J Allergy Clin Immunol 79:54-58.

  13. Ostro BD, Lipsett MJ, Mann JK, Krupnick A, and Harington W 1993. Air pollution and respiratory morbidity among adults in southern California. Am J Epidemiol. 137:691-700.

  14. Portnov FG, Shakarnis VF, Maiore DY 1975. Study of the mutagenic effect of static electric fields on Drosphilia melanogaster females. Sov Genet; 11:797-799.

  15. Ramaiya LK, Pomerantseva MD, Vikina GA 1980. Study of the action of UHF microwaves on mammalian germ and somatic cells. Cytol Genet; 14(6):1-5.

  16. Reese JA, Jostes RF, Frazier ME 1988. Exposure of mammalian cell to 60-Hz magnetic or electric fields: analysis for DNA single-strand breaks. Bioelectromagnetics; 237-247.

  17. Takahashi K. Kaneko I, Date M, Fukada E 1986. Effect of pulsing electromagnetic fields on DNA synthesis in mammalian cells in culture. Experientia; 42:185-186.

  18. Tamarkin L, Baird CJ, Ameida OF 1985. Melatonin: a coordinating signal for mammalian reproduction. Science; 227:714-720.

  19. Tsoneva MT, Penchev PR, Karev GB Gishin SS, 1975. Effect of magnetic fields on the chromosome set and cell division. Sov Gene; 11:398-401.

  20. Whitson GL, Carrier WL, Francis AA et al. 1986. Effects of extremely low frequency (ELF) electric fields on cell growth and DNA repair in human skin fibroblasts. Cell Tissue Kinet; 19:39-47.

  21. Wolff S, James TL, Young GB, Margulis AR, Bodycote J, Afzal V 1985. Magnetic resonance imaging: absence of in vitro cytogenetic damage. Radiology; 155:163-165.


A measurement of sound adjusted to represent sound levels as the human ear hears them.


Decibel. The unit used to express the amplitude (loudness) of sound levels.


Sound levels averaged over a 24-hour period and adjusted so that night time sounds are given greater influence.


Megawatt. A unit of power equal to one million watts.


Kilovolt. A unit of electromotive force equal to one thousand volts.

Next Section     Table of Contents The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Atlanta, GA 30341
Contact CDC: 800-232-4636 / TTY: 888-232-6348

A-Z Index

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
  27. #