Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options

Conclusion

Social networks are an important tool for understanding a community and mobilizing it for health improvement. New research literature has brought increased attention to the role that social networks can play in population health, and the growing use of community-engaged health promotion and research has brought to the fore the potential for social networks to support collective action for health improvement. Moreover, the emergence of electronic social media has diversified the ways in which networks can be formed and engaged. “Networking,” whether in person or electronically, is not the same as creating, sustaining, or engaging a community; if done incorrectly, it can undermine rather than support collaborative efforts. The principles laid out in this primer must be applied to the use of social networks just as they should be to all engagement efforts.

References

Arthur T. The role of social networks: a novel hypothesis to explain the phenomenon of racial disparity in kidney transplantation. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2002;40(4):678-681.

Bacon J. The art of community: building the new age of participation (theory in practice). Sebastopol (CA): O’Reilly Media; 2009.

Cattell V. Poor people, poor places, and poor health: the mediating role of social networks and social capital. Social Science and Medicine 2001;52:1501-1516.

Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine 2007;357(4):370-379.

Cohen-Cole E, Fletcher JM. Detecting implausible social network effects in acne, height, and headaches: longitudinal analysis. BMJ 2008;337:a2533.

Connor A. 18 rules of community engagement: a guide for building relationships and connecting with customers online. Silicon Valley (CA): Happy About; 2009.

Erwin DO, Johnson, VA, Trevino M, Duke K, Feliciano L, Jandorf L. A comparison of African American and Latina social networks as indicators for culturally tailoring a breast and cervical cancer education intervention. Cancer 2007;109(2 Suppl): 368-377.

Fine A. Igniting social change and the connected age. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2006.

Hatcher MT, Nicola RM. Building constituencies for public health. In: Novick LF, Morrow CB, Mays GP (editors). Public health administration: principles for population-based management (2nd ed., pp. 443-458). Sudbury (MA): Jones and Bartlett; 2008.

House JS, Umberson D, Landis K. Structures and processes of social support. Annual Review of Sociology 1998;14:293-318.

Pachucki M, Breiger, R. Cultural holes: beyond relationality in social networks and culture. Annual Review of Sociology 2010;36:205-224.

Pan RJ, Littlefield D, Valladolid SG, Tapping PJ, West DC. Building healthier communities for children and families: applying asset-based community development to community pediatrics. Pediatrics 2005;115(4 Suppl):1185-1187.

Putnam RD. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 1995;6(1):65-78.

Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University; 1994.

Zilberberg MD. The clinical research enterprise: time to change course? JAMA 2011;305(6):604-605.

Top of Page

 
Contact Us:
  • Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
    4770 Buford Hwy NE
    Atlanta, GA 30341
  • 800-CDC-INFO
    (800-232-4636)
    TTY: (888) 232-6348
    Contact CDC-INFO
  • New Hours of Operation
    8am-8pm ET/Monday-Friday
    Closed Holidays
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Atlanta, GA 30341
Contact CDC: 800-232-4636 / TTY: 888-232-6348

A-Z Index

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
  27. #