Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options

Summary Report Hair Analysis Panel Discussion Exploring The State Of The Science

Hair Analysis Panel Discussion: Section 6.2

Historical Document

This Web site is provided by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ONLY as an historical reference for the public health community. It is no longer being maintained and the data it contains may no longer be current and/or accurate.

Section 6
6.2 When Is It Appropriate To Consider Hair Analysis in Assessing Human Exposures to Environmental Contaminants?

The panelists recognized that hair analysis can serve two distinct purposes: (1) as a tool in identifying exposures (Is the substance reaching people? Does a competed pathway exist?) and (2) as a clinical tool (What is the threshold for adverse health effects?) The latter is where the largest data gaps exist. The panelists agreed that a body of literature describes specific conditions and uses of hair analysis for methyl mercury and arsenic. There may be a unique forensic setting for other metals. Segmental analysis with ultra-sensitive techniques may have a role in special cases—that is, subject-, substance-, and situation-specific cases (e.g., identification of high-dose acute exposure).

The group agreed on the general criteria that need to be fulfilled in order to consider hair analysis a valid assessment tool. Panelists encourage assessors to ask: What is the predictive value of a positive or negative test? Are data available to determine whether the measured level is of sufficient magnitude to be of pathological or public health importance? The following factors are key to that determination:

  1. Defining the type of exposure that may have occurred and over what time period. (What do exposure histories tell us about the likelihood that a particular substance will be in hair at the time of testing?)
  2. Understanding the type of substance and its behavior in the body. (Are data available that relate exposure to proportional uptake in hair? Is uptake in hair biologically plausible? Is it a marker of external exposure?)

  3. Identifying the clinical relevance of a positive or negative finding. (Are any dose-response data available that will make useful interpretations possible?)

The panel provided this specific input on when hair analysis can be useful:

  • From an exposure perspective, hair analysis can be useful for simply identifying or confirming exposures. Issues raised or reiterated included (1) the difficulty in distinguishing between internal and external contamination, (2) the qualitative nature of any such finding, (3) the inability to confirm the source of the substance under study, (4) the dilemma of not being able to "take it to the next step" (i.e., to use the results as a clinical tool). To overcome issues 1 through 3, it was noted, it may be more feasible for some substances to confirm the contamination source (e.g., based on the specific signature of the substance[s] of interest). Also, more sophisticated studies (e.g., looking at stable isotopes of certain metals) may now be possible (TC, MK, SS, LW).

  • According to the current science, the primary utility of hair analysis is as a measure of historical exposure. The research focus needs to be on seeking data that establish dose-response relationships (SS).

  • From a clinical perspective, the following conditions must be satisfied before hair analysis can be viewed as a reliable means to measure a particular substance: (1) hair contains a substance concentration that correlates with body organs, tissues, or fluids; (2) correlates exist and are predictive from a clinical and/or forensic perspective; and (3) hair can be used reliably to sample individuals, groups, and/or populations to measure the substance (RB).

  • Theoretically, potential substances for which hair analysis may be useful include those for which the route of exposure would limit external contamination and those for which a metabolite might be measurable (MK).

  • Because of general hair growth and cutting patterns, for exposures longer ago than a year or quite recent, hair analysis is not useful (RB, LW).

  • Depending on the test or element under study, a negative test can help to rule out an exposure and any potential problem. Again, "negative" needs to be defined. That is, what is elevated (RB, MK, TC, LW)?

  • Before considering hair analysis, a practical consideration is questioning whether there are any laboratories available that provide cost-effective services and reliable results (DP).


Next | Table of Contents

Top of Page

 
Contact Us:
  • Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
    4770 Buford Hwy NE
    Atlanta, GA 30341
  • 800-CDC-INFO
    (800-232-4636)
    TTY: (888) 232-6348
    Contact CDC-INFO
  • New Hours of Operation
    8am-8pm ET/Monday-Friday
    Closed Holidays
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Atlanta, GA 30341
Contact CDC: 800-232-4636 / TTY: 888-232-6348

A-Z Index

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
  27. #